School of Health Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 22;11:1059878. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1059878. eCollection 2023.
Patient satisfaction is a crucial indicator for assessing quality of care in healthcare settings. However, patient satisfaction benchmark for cancer hospitals in China is not established.
To examine patient satisfaction levels in tertiary cancer hospitals in China, and inter-hospital variations after case-mix adjustment.
A nationwide cross-sectional hospital performance survey conducted from January to March 2021.
At 30 tertiary cancer hospitals in China.
A total of 4,847 adult inpatients consecutively recruited at 30 tertiary cancer hospitals were included.
Patient characteristics included demographic characteristics (sex, age, education, and annual family income), clinical characteristics (cancer type, cancer stage, self-reported health status, and length of stay), and actual respondents of questionnaire.
Patient satisfaction was measured using 23 items covering five aspects, administrative process, hospital environment, medical care, symptom management, and overall satisfaction. Responses to each item were recorded using a 5-point Likert scale. Patient satisfaction level for each aspect was described at individual and hospital levels. Using multilevel logistic regression, patient characteristics associated with patient satisfaction were examined as case-mix adjusters and inter-hospital variation were determined.
The satisfaction rates for symptom management, administrative process, hospital environment, overall satisfaction, and medical care aspects were 74.56, 81.70, 84.18, 84.26, and 90.86% with a cut-off value of 4, respectively. Significant predictors of patient satisfaction included sex, age, cancer type, cancer stage, self-reported health status, and actual respondent (representative or patient) (all < 0.05). The ranking of the hospitals' performance in satisfaction was altered after the case-mix adjustment was made. But even after the adjustment, significant variation in satisfaction among hospitals remained.
This study pointed to symptom management as a special area, to which a keen attention should be paid by policymakers and hospital administrators. Significant variation in satisfaction among hospitals remained, implying that future studies should examine major factors affecting the variation. In review, target interventions are needed in low-performing hospitals.
患者满意度是评估医疗保健机构护理质量的关键指标。然而,中国癌症医院的患者满意度基准尚未建立。
调查中国三级癌症医院的患者满意度水平,并在病例组合调整后比较医院间的差异。
一项于 2021 年 1 月至 3 月进行的全国性癌症医院绩效横断面调查。
中国 30 家三级癌症医院。
共纳入 30 家三级癌症医院的 4847 名成年住院患者。
患者特征包括人口统计学特征(性别、年龄、教育程度和家庭年收入)、临床特征(癌症类型、癌症分期、自我报告的健康状况和住院时间)和问卷的实际应答者。
使用涵盖五个方面的 23 项内容来衡量患者满意度,包括行政流程、医院环境、医疗护理、症状管理和总体满意度。每个项目的回答都记录在 5 分李克特量表上。在个体和医院层面描述每个方面的患者满意度水平。使用多水平逻辑回归,检查与患者满意度相关的患者特征作为病例组合调整因素,并确定医院间的变异。
症状管理、行政流程、医院环境、总体满意度和医疗护理方面的满意度率分别为 74.56%、81.70%、84.18%、84.26%和 90.86%,4 分是满意度的临界值。患者满意度的显著预测因素包括性别、年龄、癌症类型、癌症分期、自我报告的健康状况和实际应答者(代表或患者)(均<0.05)。病例组合调整后,医院满意度绩效的排名发生了变化。但即使在调整后,医院间的满意度仍存在显著差异。
本研究指出症状管理是一个特殊领域,政策制定者和医院管理者应密切关注。医院间的满意度仍存在显著差异,这意味着未来的研究应检查影响差异的主要因素。总之,需要在表现不佳的医院进行有针对性的干预。