Ingram Gordon P D
School of Society, Enterprise and Environment, Bath Spa University, Bath, England.
Evol Psychol. 2013 Jul 27;11(4):788-90. doi: 10.1177/147470491301100402.
In focusing on gender differences in anger expression, Trnka (2013) provides a useful complement to the article by Ingram et al., (2012) analyzing gender differences in children's narratives about peer conflict. I agree that gender differences in anger are more likely to be the result of differential socialization processes regarding the expression of anger than by innate differences in the experience of anger. Gender differences in intersexual anger and aggression are likely to be affected by the social context, and especially whether a female is interacting with a romantic partner or an unknown male. The implication of socialization in anger expression raises the possibility that culture plays a causal role in encouraging cooperative breeding by inhibiting inter-female aggressive displays. Another of Trnka's proposals, that the expression of anger contributes to reconciliation and inhibits long-term relationship damage, is intuitively plausible and supported by the research literature, but not by data from the current study.
在关注愤怒表达中的性别差异时,特尔恩卡(2013年)对英格拉姆等人(2012年)的文章进行了有益补充,后者分析了儿童关于同伴冲突叙述中的性别差异。我同意,愤怒中的性别差异更可能是愤怒表达方面不同社会化过程的结果,而非愤怒体验中的先天差异所致。两性间愤怒与攻击行为的性别差异可能受社会环境影响,尤其是女性是在与浪漫伴侣还是陌生男性互动时。社会化在愤怒表达中的影响意味着,文化可能通过抑制女性间的攻击性表现,在鼓励合作繁殖方面起到因果作用。特尔恩卡的另一个观点是,愤怒表达有助于和解并抑制长期关系受损,这在直觉上看似合理且有研究文献支持,但本研究的数据并不支持这一观点。