• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
High-versus low-frequency stimulation effects on fine motor control in chronic hemiplegia: a pilot study.高频与低频刺激对慢性偏瘫患者精细运动控制的影响:一项初步研究。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2013 Jul-Aug;20(4):299-307. doi: 10.1310/tsr2004-299.
2
A novel functional electrical stimulation treatment for recovery of hand function in hemiplegia: 12-week pilot study.一种用于偏瘫患者手部功能恢复的新型功能性电刺激治疗:12周的初步研究。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Jan;23(1):17-25. doi: 10.1177/1545968308317577. Epub 2008 Sep 23.
3
Contralaterally controlled neuromuscular electrical stimulation for recovery of ankle dorsiflexion: a pilot randomized controlled trial in patients with chronic post-stroke hemiplegia.对侧控制神经肌肉电刺激促进慢性脑卒中后偏瘫患者踝关节背屈恢复的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Aug;92(8):656-65. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31829b4c16.
4
Mirror Therapy with Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for improving motor function of stroke survivors: A pilot randomized clinical study.镜像疗法联合神经肌肉电刺激改善脑卒中幸存者运动功能:一项随机临床预试验研究
Technol Health Care. 2016 Jul 27;24(4):503-11. doi: 10.3233/THC-161144.
5
Electromyogram-Related Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Restoring Wrist and Hand Movement in Poststroke Hemiplegia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.肌电图相关神经肌肉电刺激在脑卒中后偏瘫患者腕手运动功能恢复中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2019 Feb;33(2):96-111. doi: 10.1177/1545968319826053. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
6
Effectiveness of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Lower Limbs of Patients With Hemiplegia After Chronic Stroke: A Systematic Review.慢性脑卒中后偏瘫患者下肢应用神经肌肉电刺激的效果:系统评价。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 May;99(5):1011-1022.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.12.019. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
7
Effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and neuromuscular electrical stimulation on upper extremity motor recovery in the early period after stroke: a preliminary study.低频重复经颅磁刺激与神经肌肉电刺激对脑卒中后早期上肢运动功能恢复的影响:一项初步研究
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2017 Jul;24(5):361-367. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2017.1305644. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
8
Comparison of the effectiveness of active and passive neuromuscular electrical stimulation of hemiplegic upper extremities: a randomized, controlled trial.偏瘫上肢主动与被动神经肌肉电刺激效果的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Rehabil Res. 2013 Dec;36(4):315-22. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e328360e541.
9
[Electrical stimulation in the treatment of the spastic hemiplegic hand after stroke: a randomized study].[电刺激治疗脑卒中后痉挛性偏瘫手:一项随机研究]
Med Clin (Barc). 2011 Sep 17;137(7):297-301. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2010.10.024. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
10
Effect of EMG-triggered neuromuscular electrical stimulation with bilateral arm training on hemiplegic shoulder pain and arm function after stroke: a randomized controlled trial.肌电图触发的双侧手臂训练结合神经肌肉电刺激对脑卒中后偏瘫肩痛和上肢功能的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 Nov 28;14(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0332-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploratory Evaluation for Functional Changes of Six-Month Systematic Non-Invasive Electrical Stimulation in a Whole-Body Suit on Children with Cerebral Palsy GMFCS III-V.针对全身套装式六个月系统性无创电刺激对脑性瘫痪GMFCS III - V级儿童功能变化的探索性评估。
Neurol Int. 2025 Jun 30;17(7):102. doi: 10.3390/neurolint17070102.
2
Case Study: The Benefits of the Neubie Direct Current Electrical Stimulation Device for Pain, Spasticity, and Movement in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.案例研究:Neubie直流电刺激设备对肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者疼痛、痉挛和运动功能的益处
Integr Med (Encinitas). 2025 Apr;24(2):25-29.
3
An Open-Label Comparative Study of the Impact of Two Types of Electrical Stimulation (Direct Current Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation and Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation) on Physical Therapy Treatment of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy.两种电刺激(直流电神经肌肉电刺激和经皮电刺激)对糖尿病周围神经病变物理治疗影响的开放标签对照研究
J Diabetes Res. 2025 Feb 4;2025:9970124. doi: 10.1155/jdr/9970124. eCollection 2025.
4
Effect of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Training on Control of Involuntary Muscular Torque and Stimulation Intensity in Older Adults.神经肌肉电刺激训练对老年人非自主肌肉扭矩控制和刺激强度的影响。
Int J Exerc Sci. 2023 Apr 1;16(3):482-496. doi: 10.70252/ZKOI5585. eCollection 2023.
5
A randomised clinical trial comparing 35 Hz versus 50 Hz frequency stimulation effects on hand motor recovery in older adults after stroke.一项比较 35Hz 与 50Hz 频率刺激对手部运动功能恢复影响的随机临床试验:老年卒中患者。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 28;11(1):9131. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88607-8.
6
Skeletal muscle stiffness as measured by magnetic resonance elastography after chronic spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional pilot study.慢性脊髓损伤后磁共振弹性成像测量的骨骼肌僵硬程度:一项横断面初步研究。
Neural Regen Res. 2021 Dec;16(12):2486-2493. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.313060.
7
The use of functional electrical stimulation to improve upper limb function in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: A feasibility study.使用功能性电刺激改善偏瘫型脑瘫患儿上肢功能:一项可行性研究。
J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2018 May 14;5:2055668318768402. doi: 10.1177/2055668318768402. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec.
8
Reporting for Duty: The duty cycle in Functional Electrical Stimulation research. Part I: Critical commentaries of the literature.报到履职:功能性电刺激研究中的 duty cycle。第一部分:文献的批判性评论
Eur J Transl Myol. 2018 Nov 7;28(4):7732. doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2018.7732. eCollection 2018 Nov 2.
9
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Treatment of Muscle Impairment: Critical Review and Recommendations for Clinical Practice.用于治疗肌肉损伤的神经肌肉电刺激:临床实践的批判性综述与建议
Physiother Can. 2017;69(5):1-76. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2015-88.
10
Effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Training on Endurance Performance.神经肌肉电刺激训练对耐力表现的影响。
Front Physiol. 2016 Nov 16;7:544. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00544. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of electrical stimulation therapy on upper extremity functional recovery and cerebral cortical changes in patients with chronic hemiplegia.电刺激疗法对慢性偏瘫患者上肢功能恢复及大脑皮质变化的影响
Biomed Res. 2012 Apr;33(2):89-96. doi: 10.2220/biomedres.33.89.
2
Long-term effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation for promoting motor recovery of the upper extremity after stroke.脑卒中后神经肌肉电刺激促进上肢运动功能恢复的长期疗效。
J Rehabil Med. 2011 May;43(6):506-10. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0807.
3
Recovery of upper limb dexterity in patients more than 1 year after stroke: Frequency, clinical correlates and predictors.脑卒中后 1 年以上患者上肢灵巧性的恢复:频率、临床相关性和预测因素。
NeuroRehabilitation. 2011;28(2):105-11. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2011-0639.
4
Review of the randomized clinical stroke rehabilitation trials in 2009.2009 年随机临床脑卒中康复试验综述。
Med Sci Monit. 2011 Feb;17(2):RA25-43. doi: 10.12659/msm.881382.
5
Distributed low-frequency functional electrical stimulation delays muscle fatigue compared to conventional stimulation.分布式低频功能性电刺激与传统刺激相比,可延缓肌肉疲劳。
Muscle Nerve. 2010 Oct;42(4):556-62. doi: 10.1002/mus.21736.
6
Dose-response relation between neuromuscular electrical stimulation and upper-extremity function in patients with stroke.脑卒中患者神经肌肉电刺激与上肢功能的量效关系。
Stroke. 2010 Apr;41(4):821-4. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.574160. Epub 2010 Mar 4.
7
Effects of electrical stimulation parameters on fatigue in skeletal muscle.电刺激参数对骨骼肌疲劳的影响。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009 Sep;39(9):684-92. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.3045.
8
Multicenter randomized trial of robot-assisted rehabilitation for chronic stroke: methods and entry characteristics for VA ROBOTICS.慢性卒中机器人辅助康复的多中心随机试验:VA机器人技术的方法和入选特征
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Oct;23(8):775-83. doi: 10.1177/1545968309338195. Epub 2009 Jun 18.
9
Short-term effects and long-term use of a hybrid orthosis for neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the upper extremity in patients after chronic stroke.慢性卒中患者上肢神经肌肉电刺激混合矫形器的短期效果及长期应用
J Rehabil Med. 2009 Feb;41(3):157-61. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0299.
10
The effectiveness of the Bobath concept in stroke rehabilitation: what is the evidence?Bobath概念在中风康复中的有效性:证据是什么?
Stroke. 2009 Apr;40(4):e89-97. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.533828. Epub 2009 Jan 29.

高频与低频刺激对慢性偏瘫患者精细运动控制的影响:一项初步研究。

High-versus low-frequency stimulation effects on fine motor control in chronic hemiplegia: a pilot study.

机构信息

Division of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston, Galveston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Top Stroke Rehabil. 2013 Jul-Aug;20(4):299-307. doi: 10.1310/tsr2004-299.

DOI:10.1310/tsr2004-299
PMID:23893829
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4167381/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal parameters of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) for recovery of hand function after stroke are not known. This clinical pilot study examined whether higher or lower frequencies are more effective for improving fine motor control of the hand in a chronic poststroke population.

METHODS

A 1-month, 4 times per week, in-home regimen of either a high-frequency (40 Hz) or low-frequency (20 Hz) NMES program was applied to the hemiplegic thenar muscles of 16 persons with chronic stroke. Participants were identified a priori as having a low level of function (LF) or a high level of function (HF). Outcome measures of strength, dexterity, and endurance were measured before and after participation in the regimen.

RESULTS

LF subjects showed no significant changes with either the high- or the low-frequency NMES regimen. HF subjects showed significant changes in strength, dexterity, and endurance. Within this group, higher frequencies of stimulation yielded strength gains and increased motor activation; lower frequencies affected dexterity and endurance.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that higher frequencies of stimulation could be more effective in improving strength and motor activation properties and that lower frequencies may affect coordination and endurance changes. Results also indicate that persons with a higher functional level of recovery may respond more favorably to NMES regimens, but further study with larger patient groups is warranted.

摘要

背景

神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)在手功能恢复方面的最佳参数尚不清楚。本临床初步研究探讨了在慢性卒中人群中,较高或较低频率是否更有利于改善手部精细运动控制。

方法

16 名慢性卒中患者接受为期 1 个月、每周 4 次的高频(40 Hz)或低频(20 Hz)NMES 方案,应用于偏瘫鱼际肌。参与者预先确定为功能水平低(LF)或功能水平高(HF)。在参与方案前后测量力量、灵巧性和耐力的结局测量指标。

结果

LF 受试者在高频和低频 NMES 方案中均未显示出显著变化。HF 受试者在力量、灵巧性和耐力方面均有显著变化。在该组中,较高频率的刺激可产生力量增益和增加运动激活;较低的频率影响灵巧性和耐力。

结论

结果表明,较高频率的刺激可能更有效地改善力量和运动激活特性,而较低的频率可能影响协调和耐力的变化。结果还表明,功能恢复水平较高的患者可能对 NMES 方案更有反应,但需要进一步的、更大患者群体的研究。