Rosenman Robert, Goates Scott, Hill Laura
Washington State University, School of Economic Sciences, Hulbert Hall 101, Pullman, 99164-6210 United States.
Appl Econ. 2012 Jan 1;44(2):219-228. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2010.502111.
We analyze family decisions to participate in community-based universal substance-abuse prevention programs through the framework of expected utility theory. Family functioning, which has been shown to be a good indicator of child risk for substance abuse, provides a useful reference point for family decision making. Our results show that well-functioning families (with children at low risk for substance use) should have the lowest incentive to participate, but that high-risk families may also opt out of prevention programs. For programs that are most effective for high-risk youth, this could be a problem. Using data from the Strengthening Families Program and the Washington Healthy Youth Survey, we empirically test the implications of our model and find that at least for one measure of family functioning those families with children most likely to be at risk for substance use are opting out of the program.
我们通过预期效用理论框架分析家庭参与社区普遍性药物滥用预防项目的决策。家庭功能已被证明是儿童药物滥用风险的良好指标,为家庭决策提供了有用的参考点。我们的结果表明,功能良好的家庭(子女药物使用风险低)参与的动机应该最低,但高风险家庭也可能选择不参加预防项目。对于对高风险青少年最有效的项目来说,这可能是个问题。利用“强化家庭计划”和“华盛顿健康青少年调查”的数据,我们对模型的影响进行了实证检验,发现至少就家庭功能的一项衡量指标而言,那些子女最有可能面临药物使用风险的家庭正在选择不参加该项目。