Charles University in Prague , Faculty of Science, Department of Physical and Macromolecular Chemistry, Prague, Czech Republic.
Anal Chem. 2013 Sep 17;85(18):8526-34. doi: 10.1021/ac401381d. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
This article elucidates the practical impact of the complexation of buffer constituents with complexation agents on electrophoretic results, namely, complexation constant determination, system peak development, and proper separation of analytes. Several common buffers, which were selected based on the pH study in Part I of this paper series (Riesová, M.; Svobodová, J.; Tošner, Z.; Beneš, M.; Tesařová, E.; Gaš, B. Anal. Chem., 2013, DOI: 10.1021/ac4013804); e.g., CHES, MES, MOPS, Tricine were used to demonstrate behavior of such complex separation systems. We show that the value of a complexation constant determined in the interacting buffers environment depends not only on the analyte and complexation agent but it is also substantially affected by the type and concentration of buffer constituents. As a result, the complexation parameters determined in the interacting buffers cannot be regarded as thermodynamic ones and may provide misleading information about the strength of complexation of the compound of interest. We also demonstrate that the development of system peaks in interacting buffer systems significantly differs from the behavior known for noncomplexing systems, as the mobility of system peaks depends on the concentration and type of neutral complexation agent. Finally, we show that the use of interacting buffers can totally ruin the results of electrophoretic separation because the buffer properties change as the consequence of the buffer constituents' complexation. As a general conclusion, the interaction of buffer constituents with the complexation agent should always be considered in any method development procedures.
本文阐明了缓冲成分与配合剂络合对电泳结果的实际影响,即络合常数的测定、系统峰的发展以及分析物的适当分离。选择了几种常见的缓冲液,这些缓冲液是基于本论文系列第 I 部分的 pH 值研究(Riesová,M.;Svobodová,J.;Tošner,Z.;Beneš,M.;Tesařová,E.;Gaš,B. Anal. Chem.,2013,DOI:10.1021/ac4013804),例如 CHES、MES、MOPS、Tricine,用于演示这种复杂分离系统的行为。我们表明,在相互作用的缓冲环境中确定的络合常数值不仅取决于分析物和配合剂,而且还受到缓冲成分的类型和浓度的显著影响。因此,在相互作用的缓冲液中确定的络合参数不能被视为热力学参数,并且可能会提供有关感兴趣化合物的络合强度的误导信息。我们还表明,在相互作用的缓冲液系统中系统峰的发展与非络合系统的行为有很大的不同,因为系统峰的迁移率取决于中性配合剂的浓度和类型。最后,我们表明,使用相互作用的缓冲液可能会完全破坏电泳分离的结果,因为缓冲液的性质会因缓冲成分的络合而发生变化。总之,在任何方法开发过程中都应始终考虑缓冲成分与配合剂的相互作用。