Suppr超能文献

溶栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中后颈动脉内膜切除术的安全性。

Safety of carotid endarterectomy following thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.

机构信息

Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2013 Dec;58(6):1671-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.05.093. Epub 2013 Jul 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The timing of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) following thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke remains controversial. We have described our unit's experience and performed a systematic review and pooled data synthesis of the safety of CEA in this group of patients.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients who had undergone CEA following thrombolysis between 2010 and 2012 was performed. A systematic review of the literature was also performed using PUBMED, EMBASE, and major conference proceedings. The primary outcome measure was 30-day postoperative intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and ischemic stroke. The secondary outcome measures were 30-day postoperative all-cause morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

Seven patients underwent CEA following thrombolysis with mean age ± standard deviation of 70.57 ± 7.57. Five were men and five had CEA under local anesthesia. CEA was performed in median of 7 days (range, 2-12) after onset of stroke. Thirty-day morbidity was 14% (1/7) with one patient who experienced ICH postoperatively. There was no mortality. Nine studies were identified for systemic review. Seventy patients were included in the pooled data synthesis. One patient (1%) experienced postoperative ICH. When our series was included, the 30-day postoperative ICH was 3% (2/77). The overall 30-day postoperative morbidity was 4% (3/77), and there was no mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite slightly higher rates of postoperative hemorrhagic strokes than those in randomized trials, CEA appears safe following thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. However, more data on the timing of surgery is needed.

摘要

背景

急性缺血性脑卒中溶栓后行颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)的时机仍存在争议。我们描述了本单位的经验,并对该组患者行 CEA 的安全性进行了系统评价和汇总数据分析。

方法

回顾性分析了 2010 年至 2012 年间溶栓后行 CEA 的患者。还通过 PUBMED、EMBASE 和主要会议记录进行了文献系统评价。主要观察指标为术后 30 天内颅内出血(ICH)和缺血性卒中。次要观察指标为术后 30 天内全因发病率和死亡率。

结果

7 例患者在溶栓后行 CEA,平均年龄±标准差为 70.57±7.57 岁。5 例为男性,5 例在局部麻醉下行 CEA。CEA 中位时间为发病后 7 天(范围,2-12)。30 天发病率为 14%(1/7),1 例术后发生 ICH。无死亡病例。进行了系统评价,共确定了 9 项研究。汇总数据分析纳入了 70 例患者。1 例(1%)患者术后发生 ICH。当我们的系列纳入后,术后 30 天的 ICH 为 3%(2/77)。总体术后 30 天发病率为 4%(3/77),无死亡病例。

结论

尽管术后出血性卒中的发生率略高于随机试验,但急性缺血性脑卒中溶栓后行 CEA 似乎是安全的。然而,仍需要更多关于手术时机的数据。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验