Suppr超能文献

空腹血糖受损时的单丝感觉减退及大小神经纤维症状

Monofilament insensitivity and small and large nerve fiber symptoms in impaired fasting glucose.

作者信息

Ylitalo Kelly R, Herman William H, Harlow Siobán D

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, 6108 Brehm Tower, Ann Arbor, MI 48105-5714, USA.

出版信息

Prim Care Diabetes. 2013 Dec;7(4):309-13. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2013.07.001. Epub 2013 Jul 27.

Abstract

AIMS

To determine if diabetes or pre-diabetes is associated with monofilament insensitivity and peripheral neuropathy symptoms.

METHODS

The 10-g Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test and Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument symptom questionnaire were administered to participants in the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation - Michigan site (n=396). We determined the concordance of monofilament insensitivity and symptoms and used chi-square tests, ANOVA, and logistic regression to quantify the relationships among diabetes status, monofilament insensitivity and symptoms.

RESULTS

The prevalence of monofilament insensitivity was 14.3% and 19.4% of women reported symptoms of peripheral neuropathy. With monofilament testing, 11.7% of women with normal fasting glucose, 14.4% of women with impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and 18.3% of women with diabetes had monofilament insensitivity (p-value=0.33). For symptoms, 14.0% of women with normal fasting glucose, 16.5% of women with IFG and 31.2% of women with diabetes reported symptoms of peripheral neuropathy. Women who reported symptoms of small fiber nerve dysfunction alone were unlikely to have monofilament insensitivity. Compared to women with normal fasting glucose, women with diabetes were more likely to report peripheral neuropathy symptoms [OR 2.8 (95% CI: 1.5, 5.1)]. Women with diabetes were also more likely to report symptoms than women with IFG (p=0.02). There was no difference in the frequency of symptoms between women with normal fasting glucose and IFG.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with diabetes were more likely to report peripheral neuropathy symptoms. The prevalence of monofilament insensitivity and peripheral neuropathy symptoms did not differ between women with normal fasting glucose and IFG.

摘要

目的

确定糖尿病或糖尿病前期是否与单丝不敏感及周围神经病变症状相关。

方法

对全国妇女健康研究密歇根站点的参与者(n = 396)进行10克Semmes-Weinstein单丝试验和密歇根神经病变筛查工具症状问卷评估。我们确定了单丝不敏感与症状的一致性,并使用卡方检验、方差分析和逻辑回归来量化糖尿病状态、单丝不敏感和症状之间的关系。

结果

单丝不敏感的患病率为14.3%,19.4%的女性报告有周围神经病变症状。通过单丝测试,空腹血糖正常的女性中有11.7%、空腹血糖受损(IFG)的女性中有14.4%以及糖尿病女性中有18.3%存在单丝不敏感(p值 = 0.33)。对于症状,空腹血糖正常的女性中有14.0%、IFG女性中有16.5%以及糖尿病女性中有31.2%报告有周围神经病变症状。仅报告小纤维神经功能障碍症状的女性不太可能存在单丝不敏感。与空腹血糖正常的女性相比,糖尿病女性更有可能报告周围神经病变症状[比值比2.8(95%置信区间:1.5,5.1)]。糖尿病女性也比IFG女性更有可能报告症状(p = 0.02)。空腹血糖正常的女性和IFG女性之间的症状频率没有差异。

结论

糖尿病女性更有可能报告周围神经病变症状。空腹血糖正常的女性和IFG女性之间单丝不敏感和周围神经病变症状的患病率没有差异。

相似文献

5
Prediabetic neuropathy: does it exist?糖尿病前期神经病变:它是否存在?
Curr Diab Rep. 2012 Aug;12(4):376-83. doi: 10.1007/s11892-012-0278-3.
7
Variability in the clinical diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy.糖尿病周围神经病变的临床诊断差异。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2020 Feb;14(1):53-60. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2019.05.008. Epub 2019 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

3
Physical Activity and Physical Function: Moving and Aging.身体活动与身体机能:运动与老龄化。
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2018 Dec;45(4):723-736. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2018.07.009. Epub 2018 Oct 25.

本文引用的文献

3
Idiopathic neuropathy: new paradigms, new promise.特发性神经病:新范例,新希望。
J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2012 May;17 Suppl 2:43-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8027.2012.00395.x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验