Schweigert Michael, Solymosi Norbert, Dubecz Attila, Stadlhuber Rudolf J, Ofner Dietmar, Stein Hubert J
Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, Klinikum Nuremberg Nord, Nuremberg, Germany.
Am Surg. 2013 Aug;79(8):754-63.
Operative management of esophageal carcinoma in the very elderly is still controversially discussed. It is not yet decided whether the risk warrants the procedure. The aim of this study is to analyze the outcome of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in the very elderly. Factors influencing the clinical course and determining the outcome are identified. A retrospective study 292 consecutive cases of esophagectomy for nonmetastatic esophageal cancer at a German tertiary referral hospital between 2004 and 2011 were reviewed. Two age groups (75 years or older and younger than 75 years) were formed. The mean age was 63 years. Altogether 45 patients were 75 years or older. There were no significant differences in American Society of Anesthesiologists score, operative procedure, or in the frequency of anastomotic leakage between the age groups. However, very elderly patients with anastomotic leak had an eight times higher risk for fatal outcome than the very elderly without leak (odds ratio [OR], 8.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0 to 112.18; P = 0.025). Moreover, the odds for postoperative death were five times higher in very elderly patients with leak than in younger patients sustaining anastomotic leakage (OR, 5.67; 95% CI, 0.67 to 73.83; P = 0.046). In general, the very elderly had a three times higher risk for a fatal outcome (OR, 3.30; 95% CI, 1.37 to 7.86; P = 0.008). In-hospital mortality of the very elderly was 11 out of 45 compared with 8 per cent (20 of 247) in the younger group. Fatal outcome was more often caused by medical (seven) than by surgical complications (four cases). The remaining 34 patients recovered well. Very elderly patients undergoing esophagectomy have no elevated risk for occurrence of surgical complications, whereas the mortality of these complications is much higher. Improved outcome is achievable by timely management of postoperative surgical as well as medical complications. Notwithstanding the increased mortality, esophagectomy should be considered in thoroughly selected very elderly patients with curable esophageal carcinoma.
高龄食管癌患者的手术治疗仍存在争议。目前尚未确定手术风险是否值得进行该手术。本研究旨在分析高龄食管癌患者行食管切除术后的结果。确定影响临床病程和决定预后的因素。对德国一家三级转诊医院2004年至2011年间连续292例非转移性食管癌行食管切除术的病例进行回顾性研究。分为两个年龄组(75岁及以上和75岁以下)。平均年龄为63岁。共有45例患者年龄在75岁及以上。两个年龄组在麻醉医师协会评分、手术方式或吻合口漏发生率方面无显著差异。然而,发生吻合口漏的高龄患者死亡风险比未发生漏的高龄患者高8倍(比值比[OR],8.54;95%置信区间[CI],1.0至112.18;P = 0.025)。此外,发生吻合口漏的高龄患者术后死亡几率比发生吻合口漏的年轻患者高5倍(OR,5.67;95% CI,0.67至73.83;P = 0.046)。总体而言,高龄患者死亡风险高3倍(OR,3.30;95% CI,1.37至7.86;P = 0.008)。45例高龄患者中有11例住院死亡,而年轻组的住院死亡率为8%(247例中有20例)。死亡更常由内科并发症(7例)而非外科并发症(4例)引起。其余34例患者恢复良好。行食管切除术的高龄患者发生手术并发症的风险并未增加,但其并发症死亡率要高得多。通过及时处理术后外科及内科并发症可改善预后。尽管死亡率有所增加,但对于经过严格筛选的可治愈的高龄食管癌患者,仍应考虑行食管切除术。