• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区城市创伤中心创伤后早期死亡模式:我们能否改善治疗结果?

Patterns of early mortality after trauma in a neighborhood urban trauma center: can we improve outcomes?

作者信息

Berbiglia Lindsay, Lopez Peter P, Bair Leah, Ammon Adelaide, Navas Gwyneth, Keller Melissa, Diebel Lawrence N

机构信息

Department of Trauma Surgery, Sinai Grace Hospital, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2013 Aug;79(8):764-7.

PMID:23896241
Abstract

Even with specialized trauma systems, a significant number of deaths occur within the early postinjury period. Our goal was to examine deaths within this period for cause and determine if care could improve outcomes. A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who were dead on arrival or died within 4 hours of arrival between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2011. Survival probabilities and Injury Severity Score (ISS) were calculated. Chart review and trauma review processes were used to determine cases with opportunities for care improvement. Two hundred eighty-nine patients were dead on arrival (DOA), and 176 patients died within 4 hours of arrival. The most common mechanism of injury was gunshot wounds (68.4%). The most common causes of death were uncontrolled hemorrhage (68.2%) and neurologic trauma (23.4%). Average ISS was 32. Twenty-nine patients had survival probability percentages over 50. Ten of 176 (5.7%) deaths were found to have opportunities for care improvement. In three cases (1.7%), errors contributed to death. The majority of trauma patients DOA or dying within 4 hours of hospital arrival have nonsurvivable injuries. Regular trauma review processes are invaluable in determining opportunities for care improvement. Autopsy information increases the reliability of the review process.

摘要

即使有专门的创伤系统,仍有相当数量的患者在伤后早期死亡。我们的目标是调查这一时期内的死亡原因,并确定医疗护理能否改善治疗结果。对2005年1月1日至2011年12月31日期间所有入院时已死亡或入院后4小时内死亡的患者进行了回顾性病历审查。计算了生存概率和损伤严重度评分(ISS)。通过病历审查和创伤评估流程来确定存在护理改善机会的病例。289例患者入院时已死亡(DOA),176例患者在入院后4小时内死亡。最常见的致伤机制是枪伤(68.4%)。最常见的死亡原因是无法控制的出血(68.2%)和神经创伤(23.4%)。平均ISS为32。29例患者的生存概率百分比超过50%。在176例死亡病例中有10例(5.7%)被发现存在护理改善机会。在3例病例(1.7%)中,失误导致了死亡。大多数入院时已死亡或在入院后4小时内死亡的创伤患者存在无法挽救的损伤。定期的创伤评估流程对于确定护理改善机会非常宝贵。尸检信息提高了评估流程的可靠性。

相似文献

1
Patterns of early mortality after trauma in a neighborhood urban trauma center: can we improve outcomes?社区城市创伤中心创伤后早期死亡模式:我们能否改善治疗结果?
Am Surg. 2013 Aug;79(8):764-7.
2
Autopsy data in the peer review process improves outcomes analysis.同行评审过程中的尸检数据可改善结果分析。
J Trauma. 2007 Jan;62(1):69-73; discussion 73. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31802d08e5.
3
Epidemiological and Trauma Injury and Severity Score (TRISS) analysis of trauma patients at a tertiary care centre in India.印度一家三级医疗中心创伤患者的流行病学及创伤损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)分析
Natl Med J India. 2004 Jul-Aug;17(4):186-9.
4
Survival benefit of transfer to tertiary trauma centers for major trauma patients initially presenting to nontertiary trauma centers.原发于非三甲创伤中心的严重创伤患者转送至三甲创伤中心的生存获益。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Nov;17(11):1223-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00918.x.
5
The effect of dead-on-arrival and emergency department death classification on risk-adjusted performance in the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program.死亡即入院和急诊科死亡分类对美国外科医师学会创伤质量改进计划中风险调整绩效的影响。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Nov;73(5):1086-91; discussion 1091-2. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31826fc7a0.
6
Moving beyond personnel and process: a case for incorporating outcome measures in the trauma center designation process.超越人员与流程:在创伤中心指定过程中纳入结果指标的理由。
Arch Surg. 2008 Feb;143(2):115-9; discussion 120. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2007.29.
7
[Correlation between survival time and severity of injuries in fatal injuries in traffic accidents].[交通事故致命伤中生存时间与损伤严重程度的相关性]
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2001 Nov-Dec;129(11-12):291-5.
8
Preventability of trauma deaths in a Dutch Level-1 trauma centre.荷兰 1 级创伤中心创伤死亡的可预防性。
Injury. 2011 Sep;42(9):870-3. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.04.007. Epub 2010 May 1.
9
Time for a change in injury and trauma care delivery: a trauma death review analysis.损伤与创伤护理交付模式变革的时机:创伤死亡回顾分析
ANZ J Surg. 2008 Nov;78(11):949-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04711.x.
10
Performance and consistency of care in admitted trauma patients: our next great opportunity in trauma care?创伤住院患者护理的绩效与一致性:这会是我们在创伤护理领域的下一个重大机遇吗?
ANZ J Surg. 2009 Jun;79(6):443-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2009.04946.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics of Prehospital Death in Trauma Victims.创伤受害者院前死亡的特征
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 18;10(20):4765. doi: 10.3390/jcm10204765.
2
Analysis of Injury and Mortality Patterns in Deceased Patients with Road Traffic Injuries: An Autopsy Study.道路交通事故伤死亡患者损伤与死因模式分析:尸检研究。
World J Surg. 2017 Dec;41(12):3111-3119. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4122-4.
3
Learning from 2523 trauma deaths in India- opportunities to prevent in-hospital deaths.从印度2523例创伤死亡病例中吸取经验——预防院内死亡的机会
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb 16;17(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2085-7.
4
Bystander first aid in trauma - prevalence and quality: a prospective observational study.创伤中的旁观者急救——发生率与质量:一项前瞻性观察研究
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Oct;59(9):1187-93. doi: 10.1111/aas.12561. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
5
Temporal trends and differences in mortality at trauma centres across Ontario from 2005 to 2011: a retrospective cohort study.2005年至2011年安大略省各创伤中心死亡率的时间趋势及差异:一项回顾性队列研究。
CMAJ Open. 2014 Jul 22;2(3):E176-82. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20140007. eCollection 2014 Jul.