• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

每例患者的输血相关不良反应发生率反映了日本输血治疗的潜在风险。

Incidence of transfusion-related adverse reactions per patient reflects the potential risk of transfusion therapy in Japan.

机构信息

Department of Transfusion Medicine, Aichi Medical University, 1-1, Yazakokarimata, Nagakute, Aichi 480-1195, Japan.

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 2013 Aug;140(2):219-24. doi: 10.1309/AJCP6SBPOX0UWHEK.

DOI:10.1309/AJCP6SBPOX0UWHEK
PMID:23897258
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe the frequency of adverse reactions (ARs) after transfusion on both per transfused patient and per transfused unit bases.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of data available from records of 6 hospitals on the total number of transfusions and documented ARs between January 2008 and December 2009 for RBCs, fresh-frozen plasma (FFP), and platelet concentrates (PCs).

RESULTS

The incidence of ARs to RBCs, FFP, and PCs per transfused unit was 0.6%, 1.3%, and 3.8%, respectively. The incidence of ARs to RBCs, FFP, and PCs per patient was 2.6%, 4.3%, and 13.2%, respectively-almost 3-fold higher. Most RBC-ARs were febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions and allergic reactions, whereas most FFP-ARs and PC-ARs were allergic reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of ARs per transfused patient may reflect better the potential risk of transfusion with blood components, taking into account the characteristics of the transfused patient.

摘要

目的

描述以每输注患者和每输注单位为基础的输血后不良反应 (ARs) 的频率。

方法

我们对 6 家医院的记录中 2008 年 1 月至 2009 年 12 月期间的总输血量和记录的 ARs 数据进行了回顾性分析,对象为 RBC、新鲜冷冻血浆 (FFP) 和血小板浓缩物 (PC)。

结果

每输注单位的 RBC、FFP 和 PC 的 AR 发生率分别为 0.6%、1.3%和 3.8%。每输注患者的 RBC、FFP 和 PC 的 AR 发生率分别为 2.6%、4.3%和 13.2%-几乎高 3 倍。大多数 RBC-AR 为发热非溶血性输血反应和过敏反应,而大多数 FFP-AR 和 PC-AR 为过敏反应。

结论

考虑到输注患者的特点,以每输注患者为基础的 AR 发生率可能更好地反映输血相关血液成分的潜在风险。

相似文献

1
Incidence of transfusion-related adverse reactions per patient reflects the potential risk of transfusion therapy in Japan.每例患者的输血相关不良反应发生率反映了日本输血治疗的潜在风险。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2013 Aug;140(2):219-24. doi: 10.1309/AJCP6SBPOX0UWHEK.
2
Repeated exposure rather than the total volume of transfused components may influence the incidence of allergic transfusion reactions.反复接触而非所输注成分的总量可能会影响过敏输血反应的发生率。
Transfusion. 2015 Nov;55(11):2576-81. doi: 10.1111/trf.13201. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
3
Reduction of febrile but not allergic reactions to RBCs and platelets after conversion to universal prestorage leukoreduction.转换为通用的预储存白细胞去除后,发热反应减少,但对红细胞和血小板的过敏反应未减少。
Transfusion. 2004 Jan;44(1):16-24. doi: 10.1046/j.0041-1132.2004.00608.x.
4
A comparison of adverse reaction rates for PAS C versus plasma platelet units.对乙酰水杨酸C与血浆血小板单位的不良反应率比较。
Transfusion. 2014 Aug;54(8):1927-34. doi: 10.1111/trf.12597. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
5
Transfusion treatment at Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital Center during a twelve-year period.十二年期间,萨格勒布大学医院中心圣母怜子医院的输血治疗情况。
Acta Clin Croat. 2014 Sep;53(3):342-7.
6
A retrospective observational study to assess adverse transfusion reactions of patients with and without prior transfusion history.一项回顾性观察研究,旨在评估有或无既往输血史患者的输血不良反应。
Vox Sang. 2015 Apr;108(3):243-50. doi: 10.1111/vox.12208. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
7
Analysis of complications after blood components' transfusions.血液成分输血后并发症分析。
Pol Przegl Chir. 2015 Apr;87(4):166-73. doi: 10.1515/pjs-2015-0039.
8
Universal leukodepletion of blood components results in a significant reduction of febrile non-hemolytic but not allergic transfusion reactions.对血液成分进行普遍白细胞去除可显著减少发热性非溶血性输血反应,但不会减少过敏输血反应。
Transfus Apher Sci. 2004 Feb;30(1):41-6. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2003.08.013.
9
The effect of prestorage WBC reduction on the rates of febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions to platelet concentrates and RBC.储存前白细胞去除对血小板浓缩物和红细胞发热性非溶血性输血反应发生率的影响。
Transfusion. 2004 Jan;44(1):10-5. doi: 10.1046/j.0041-1132.2003.00518.x.
10
Reduction in adverse transfusion reactions with increased use of washed platelet concentrates in Japan-A retrospective multicenter study.日本增加使用洗涤血小板浓缩物可减少不良输血反应——一项回顾性多中心研究
Transfus Apher Sci. 2019 Apr;58(2):162-168. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2018.12.021. Epub 2019 Jan 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidence of acute transfusion reactions and associated factors among adult blood-transfused patients at Jimma University Medical Center, southwest Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study.在埃塞俄比亚西南部的 Jimma 大学医学中心,成年输血患者中急性输血反应的发生率及其相关因素:一项横断面研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Aug 9;103(32):e39137. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039137.
2
Review of haemovigilance at the Rabat Regional Blood Transfusion Centre in Morocco (2017-2021).摩洛哥拉巴特地区输血中心的血液警戒审查(2017 - 2021年)
Pan Afr Med J. 2024 Feb 12;47:60. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2024.47.60.42250. eCollection 2024.
3
Transfusion reactions associated with COVID-19 convalescent plasma in outpatient clinical trials.
门诊临床试验中与 COVID-19 恢复期血浆相关的输血反应。
Transfusion. 2023 Sep;63(9):1639-1648. doi: 10.1111/trf.17485. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
4
A Comparison of Transfusion-Related Adverse Reactions Among Apheresis Platelets, Whole Blood-Derived Platelets, and Platelets Subjected to Pathogen Reduction Technology as Reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network Hemovigilance Module.国家医疗保健安全网络血液监测模块报告的关于机采血小板、全血来源血小板和经病原体减少处理技术处理的血小板的输血相关不良反应比较。
Transfus Med Rev. 2021 Apr;35(2):78-84. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2021.03.003. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
5
Convalescent Plasma for the Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Quantitative Analysis.恢复期血浆用于 COVID-19 的预防和治疗:系统评价和定量分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Apr 7;7(4):e25500. doi: 10.2196/25500.
6
Safety and tolerability of GRF6019 in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease dementia.GRF6019在轻度至中度阿尔茨海默病性痴呆中的安全性和耐受性。
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2020 Dec 16;6(1):e12115. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12115. eCollection 2020.
7
Proportion of Acute Transfusion Reaction and Associated Factors Among Adult Transfused Patients at Felege Hiwot Compressive Referral Hospital, Bahir Dar, Northwest Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study.埃塞俄比亚西北部巴赫达尔市费莱格希沃特综合转诊医院成年输血患者急性输血反应比例及其相关因素:一项横断面研究
J Blood Med. 2020 Jun 30;11:227-236. doi: 10.2147/JBM.S250653. eCollection 2020.
8
Basophil Activation Test: Old and New Applications in Allergy.嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验:在过敏中的新旧应用。
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2018 Nov 15;18(12):77. doi: 10.1007/s11882-018-0831-5.
9
Analysis of Acute Transfusion Reactions and Their Occurrence Times.急性输血反应及其发生时间的分析
Yonago Acta Med. 2018 Mar 28;61(1):87-90. doi: 10.33160/yam.2018.03.013. eCollection 2018 Mar.
10
Transfusion-related adverse reactions in pediatric and surgical patients at a tertiary care teaching hospital in India.印度一家三级护理教学医院儿科和外科患者的输血相关不良反应
Asian J Transfus Sci. 2017 Jul-Dec;11(2):180-187. doi: 10.4103/0973-6247.214348.