• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Assessing Comprehension During Reading with the Reading Strategy Assessment Tool (RSAT).使用阅读策略评估工具(RSAT)评估阅读过程中的理解情况。
Metacogn Learn. 2011 Aug;6(2):131-154. doi: 10.1007/s11409-010-9064-2.
2
Assessment of inference-making in children using comprehension questions and story retelling: Effect of text modality and a story presentation format.使用理解性问题和故事复述对儿童推理能力的评估:文本模态和故事呈现形式的影响。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021 May;56(3):637-652. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12620.
3
Materials Matter: An Exploration of Text Complexity and Its Effects on Middle School Readers' Comprehension Processing.材料 Matters:文本复杂度及其对中学生阅读理解加工的影响探索。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2021 Apr 20;52(2):702-716. doi: 10.1044/2021_LSHSS-20-00117. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
4
Easy-to-read texts for students with intellectual disability: linguistic factors affecting comprehension.智障学生易懂的文本:影响理解的语言因素。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2014 May;27(3):212-25. doi: 10.1111/jar.12065. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
5
A measure of individual differences in readers' approaches to text and its relation to reading experience and reading comprehension.一种衡量读者处理文本方式的个体差异及其与阅读体验和阅读理解关系的方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Feb;55(2):899-931. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01852-1. Epub 2022 May 3.
6
Fine-Grained Assessment of Children's Text Comprehension Skills.儿童文本理解能力的细粒度评估
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 28;10:1313. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01313. eCollection 2019.
7
Effects of phonological loop on inferential processing during Chinese text reading: Evidence from a dual-task paradigm.语音环路对中文阅读推理加工的影响:来自双任务范式的证据。
Psych J. 2021 Aug;10(4):521-533. doi: 10.1002/pchj.451. Epub 2021 May 2.
8
Assessing the format of the presentation of text in developing a Reading Strategy Assessment Tool (R-SAT).在开发阅读策略评估工具(R-SAT)时评估文本呈现的格式。
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):199-204. doi: 10.3758/bf03193148.
9
Effects of Adjunct Questions on L2 Reading Comprehension with Texts of Different Types.附加问题对不同类型文本的二语阅读理解的影响。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Feb 15;14(2):138. doi: 10.3390/bs14020138.
10
Learning disabled and average readers' working memory and comprehension: does metacognition play a role?学习障碍者与普通阅读者的工作记忆及阅读理解:元认知起作用吗?
Br J Educ Psychol. 1996 Sep;66 ( Pt 3):333-55. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1996.tb01201.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationships between task awareness, comprehension strategies, and literacy outcomes.
Front Psychol. 2023 May 3;14:1056457. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1056457. eCollection 2023.
2
Leveraging a multidimensional linguistic analysis of constructed responses produced by college readers.利用对大学生读者所写的结构化回答进行的多维度语言分析。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 10;13:936162. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.936162. eCollection 2022.
3
Linguistic Markers of Inference Generation While Reading.阅读过程中推理生成的语言标记
J Psycholinguist Res. 2016 Jun;45(3):553-74. doi: 10.1007/s10936-015-9360-8.
4
The Interplay of Reader Goals, Working Memory, and Text Structure During Reading.阅读过程中读者目标、工作记忆与文本结构的相互作用
Contemp Educ Psychol. 2014 Jul 1;39(3):206-219. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.05.003.
5
The development and analysis of tutorial dialogues in AutoTutor Lite.AutoTutor Lite 中辅导对话的开发和分析。
Behav Res Methods. 2013 Sep;45(3):623-36. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0352-z.
6
Starting from scratch and building brick by brick in comprehension.从零开始,逐步提高理解能力。
Mem Cognit. 2012 Jul;40(5):812-26. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0179-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the format of the presentation of text in developing a Reading Strategy Assessment Tool (R-SAT).在开发阅读策略评估工具(R-SAT)时评估文本呈现的格式。
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):199-204. doi: 10.3758/bf03193148.
2
Typing versus thinking aloud when reading: implications for computer-based assessment and training tools.阅读时打字与出声思考:对基于计算机的评估和训练工具的启示
Behav Res Methods. 2006 May;38(2):211-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03192771.
3
iSTART: interactive strategy training for active reading and thinking.iSTART:主动阅读与思考的交互式策略训练。
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 May;36(2):222-33. doi: 10.3758/bf03195567.
4
Identifying reading strategies using latent semantic analysis: comparing semantic benchmarks.使用潜在语义分析识别阅读策略:比较语义基准。
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 May;36(2):213-21. doi: 10.3758/bf03195566.
5
Using latent semantic analysis to assess reader strategies.
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2002 May;34(2):181-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03195441.
6
The Effects of Adjunct Questions and Feedback on Improving the Reading Comprehension Skills of Learning-Disabled Adolescents.附加问题和反馈对提高学习障碍青少年阅读理解能力的影响。
Contemp Educ Psychol. 2001 Jan;26(1):25-43. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1025.
7
Constructing and Validating Motive Bridging Inferences.构建和验证动机衔接推理
Cogn Psychol. 1996 Feb;30(1):1-38. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1996.0001.
8
Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension.在叙事文本理解过程中构建推理。
Psychol Rev. 1994 Jul;101(3):371-95. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.101.3.371.
9
The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model.知识在语篇理解中的作用:一种建构-整合模型。
Psychol Rev. 1988 Apr;95(2):163-82. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.163.
10
Automatic activation of episodic information in a semantic memory task.语义记忆任务中情景信息的自动激活。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1986 Jan;12(1):108-15. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.12.1.108.

使用阅读策略评估工具(RSAT)评估阅读过程中的理解情况。

Assessing Comprehension During Reading with the Reading Strategy Assessment Tool (RSAT).

作者信息

Magliano Joseph P, Millis Keith K, Levinstein Irwin

机构信息

Northern Illinois University.

出版信息

Metacogn Learn. 2011 Aug;6(2):131-154. doi: 10.1007/s11409-010-9064-2.

DOI:10.1007/s11409-010-9064-2
PMID:23901332
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3725311/
Abstract

Comprehension emerges as the results of inference and strategic processes that support the construction of a coherent mental model for a text. However, the vast majority of comprehension skills tests adopt a format that does not afford an assessment of these processes as they operate during reading. This study assessed the viability of the Reading Strategy Assessment Tool (RSAT), which is an automated computer-based reading assessment designed to measure readers' comprehension and spontaneous use of reading strategies while reading texts. In the tool, readers comprehend passages one sentence at a time, and are asked either an indirect ("What are your thoughts regarding your understanding of the sentence in the context of the passage?") or direct (e.g., why X?) question after reading each pre-selected target sentence. The answers to the indirect questions are analyzed on the extent that they contain words associated with comprehension processes. The answers to direct questions are coded for the number of content words in common with an ideal answer, which is intended to be an assessment of emerging comprehension. In the study, the RSAT approach was shown to predict measures of comprehension comparable to standardized tests. The RSAT variables were also shown to correlate with human ratings. The results of this study constitute a "proof of concept" and demonstrate that it is possible to develop a comprehension skills assessment tool that assesses both comprehension and comprehension strategies.

摘要

理解是推理和策略过程的结果,这些过程支持为文本构建连贯的心理模型。然而,绝大多数理解技能测试采用的形式无法在阅读过程中对这些过程进行评估。本研究评估了阅读策略评估工具(RSAT)的可行性,该工具是一种基于计算机的自动化阅读评估,旨在测量读者在阅读文本时的理解能力和对阅读策略的自发运用。在该工具中,读者一次理解一个句子,并在读完每个预先选定的目标句子后被问到一个间接问题(“你对该句子在文章语境中的理解有什么想法?”)或直接问题(例如,为什么是X?)。间接问题的答案根据其包含与理解过程相关词汇的程度进行分析。直接问题的答案根据与理想答案共有的内容词数量进行编码,这旨在评估正在形成的理解。在该研究中,RSAT方法被证明能够预测与标准化测试相当的理解测量结果。RSAT变量也被证明与人工评分相关。本研究结果构成了一个“概念验证”,表明有可能开发一种既能评估理解能力又能评估理解策略的理解技能评估工具。