• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Starting from scratch and building brick by brick in comprehension.从零开始,逐步提高理解能力。
Mem Cognit. 2012 Jul;40(5):812-26. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0179-8.
2
Attentional focus affects how events are segmented and updated in narrative reading.注意力焦点会影响叙事性阅读中事件的分割与更新方式。
Mem Cognit. 2017 Aug;45(6):940-955. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0707-2.
3
Segmentation in reading and film comprehension.阅读与电影理解中的分段。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009 May;138(2):307-27. doi: 10.1037/a0015305.
4
Situation model updating in young and older adults: Global versus incremental mechanisms.年轻人和老年人的情境模型更新:全局机制与增量机制
Psychol Aging. 2015 Jun;30(2):232-44. doi: 10.1037/a0039081. Epub 2015 May 4.
5
The construction of visual-spatial situation models in children's reading and their relation to reading comprehension.儿童阅读中视觉-空间情境模型的构建及其与阅读理解的关系。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2014 Mar;119:101-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.10.011. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
6
Revising what readers know: updating text representations during narrative comprehension.修正读者已知内容:叙事理解过程中更新文本表征
Mem Cognit. 2007 Dec;35(8):2019-32. doi: 10.3758/bf03192934.
7
Predictability of locomotion: effects on updating of spatial situation models during narrative comprehension.运动的可预测性:对叙事理解过程中空间情境模型更新的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2006 Sep;34(6):1193-205. doi: 10.3758/bf03193265.
8
Narrative event boundaries, reading times, and expectation.叙事事件边界、阅读时间与期望
Mem Cognit. 2016 Oct;44(7):1064-75. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0619-6.
9
Assessing the influence of dimensional focus during situation model construction.评估情境模型构建过程中维度焦点的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2006 Jan;34(1):78-89. doi: 10.3758/bf03193388.
10
When attention matters: the curious incident of the wandering mind.当注意力至关重要时:心不在焉的离奇事件。
Mem Cognit. 2008 Sep;36(6):1144-50. doi: 10.3758/MC.36.6.1144.

引用本文的文献

1
Events in the stream of behavior.行为流中的事件。
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2025 Oct;65. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101581. Epub 2025 Jul 24.
2
The neural basis of event segmentation: Stable features in the environment are reflected by neural states.事件分割的神经基础:环境中的稳定特征由神经状态反映出来。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025 Jan 15;3. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00432. eCollection 2025.
3
Hierarchical event segmentation of episodic memory in virtual reality.虚拟现实中情景记忆的分层事件分割
NPJ Sci Learn. 2025 May 11;10(1):25. doi: 10.1038/s41539-025-00321-6.
4
A Computational Framework to Study Hierarchical Processing in Visual Narratives.一个用于研究视觉叙事中分层处理的计算框架。
Cogn Sci. 2025 May;49(5):e70050. doi: 10.1111/cogs.70050.
5
Modeling human activity comprehension at human scale: prediction, segmentation, and categorization.在人类尺度上对人类活动理解进行建模:预测、分割和分类。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Oct 11;3(10):pgae459. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae459. eCollection 2024 Oct.
6
Bridging a Gap in Coherence: The Coordination of Comprehension Processes When Viewing Visual Narratives.弥合连贯性差距:观看视觉叙事时理解过程的协调
Vision (Basel). 2024 Aug 30;8(3):50. doi: 10.3390/vision8030050.
7
Construction or updating? Event model processes during visual narrative comprehension.构建还是更新?视觉叙事理解过程中的事件模型处理。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Oct;31(5):2092-2101. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02424-w. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
8
Events shape long-term memory for story information.事件塑造了对故事信息的长期记忆。
Discourse Process. 2023;60(2):141-161. doi: 10.1080/0163853x.2023.2185408. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
9
Examining the role of information integration in the continued influence effect using an event segmentation approach.采用事件分割法考察信息整合在持续影响效应中的作用。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 18;17(7):e0271566. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271566. eCollection 2022.
10
Vaccination against misinformation: The inoculation technique reduces the continued influence effect.接种反虚假信息疫苗:接种技术可降低持续影响效果。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 28;17(4):e0267463. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267463. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Building and Accessing Clausal Representations: The Advantage of First Mention versus the Advantage of Clause Recency.构建和访问从句表征:首次提及优势与从句新近性优势。
J Mem Lang. 1989 Dec;28(6):735-755. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(89)90006-5.
2
Two Decades of Structure Building.二十年的结构构建
Discourse Process. 1997 Jan;23(3):265-304. doi: 10.1080/01638539709544994.
3
Surface Information Loss in Comprehension.理解中的表面信息丢失。
Cogn Psychol. 1985 Jul;17(3):324-363. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(85)90012-X.
4
Assessing Comprehension During Reading with the Reading Strategy Assessment Tool (RSAT).使用阅读策略评估工具(RSAT)评估阅读过程中的理解情况。
Metacogn Learn. 2011 Aug;6(2):131-154. doi: 10.1007/s11409-010-9064-2.
5
Prediction error associated with the perceptual segmentation of naturalistic events.与自然事件的知觉分割相关的预测误差。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Dec;23(12):4057-66. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00078. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
6
A computational model of event segmentation from perceptual prediction.从感知预测中进行事件分割的计算模型。
Cogn Sci. 2007 Jul 8;31(4):613-43. doi: 10.1080/15326900701399913.
7
Age differences in the perception of hierarchical structure in events.事件中层次结构感知的年龄差异。
Mem Cognit. 2011 Jan;39(1):75-91. doi: 10.3758/s13421-010-0027-2.
8
The Brain's Cutting-Room Floor: Segmentation of Narrative Cinema.大脑的剪辑室地板:叙事电影的分割
Front Hum Neurosci. 2010 Oct 1;4. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00168. eCollection 2010.
9
Changes in events alter how people remember recent information.事件的变化改变了人们对近期信息的记忆方式。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 May;23(5):1052-64. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21524. Epub 2010 Jun 3.
10
Reading times and the detection of event shift processing.阅读时间与事件移位加工的检测。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jan;36(1):210-6. doi: 10.1037/a0017258.

从零开始,逐步提高理解能力。

Starting from scratch and building brick by brick in comprehension.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Grand Valley State University, 2224 Au Sable Hall, Allendale, MI 49401, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2012 Jul;40(5):812-26. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0179-8.

DOI:10.3758/s13421-011-0179-8
PMID:22282158
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4190164/
Abstract

During narrative comprehension, readers construct representations of the situation described by a text, called situation models. Theories of situation model construction and event comprehension posit two distinct types of situation model updating: incremental updating of individual situational dimensions, and global updates in which an old model is abandoned and a new one created. No research to date has directly tested whether readers update their situation models incrementally, globally, or both. We investigated whether both incremental and global updating occur during narrative comprehension. Participants typed what they were thinking while reading an extended narrative, and then segmented the narrative into meaningful events. Each typed think-aloud response was coded for whether it mentioned characters, objects, space, time, goals, or causes. There was evidence for both incremental and global updating: Readers mentioned situation dimensions more when those dimensions changed, controlling for the onset of a new event. Readers also mentioned situation dimensions more at points when a new event began than during event middles, controlling for the presence of situational change. These results support theories that claim that readers engage in both incremental and global updating during extended narrative comprehension.

摘要

在叙述性理解过程中,读者构建文本所描述的情境的表示形式,称为情境模型。情境模型构建和事件理解理论假设了两种不同类型的情境模型更新:对单个情境维度的增量更新,以及放弃旧模型并创建新模型的全局更新。迄今为止,尚无研究直接测试读者是否会增量、全局或两者兼而有之更新他们的情境模型。我们调查了叙述性理解过程中是否同时发生增量和全局更新。参与者在阅读扩展叙述时输入他们的想法,然后将叙述分割成有意义的事件。对每个键入的思考 aloud 响应进行编码,以确定它是否提到了人物、物体、空间、时间、目标或原因。有证据表明存在增量和全局更新:当情境维度发生变化时,读者会更多地提到情境维度,而控制新事件的开始。读者还会在新事件开始时比在事件中间更多地提到情境维度,而控制情境变化的存在。这些结果支持了那些声称读者在扩展的叙述性理解过程中同时进行增量和全局更新的理论。