• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用户对一种使用术语熟悉度的文本简化算法在感知、理解、学习和信息保留方面效果的评估。

User evaluation of the effects of a text simplification algorithm using term familiarity on perception, understanding, learning, and information retention.

作者信息

Leroy Gondy, Endicott James E, Kauchak David, Mouradi Obay, Just Melissa

机构信息

Information Systems and Technology, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA 91711, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2013 Jul 31;15(7):e144. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2569.

DOI:10.2196/jmir.2569
PMID:23903235
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3742397/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adequate health literacy is important for people to maintain good health and manage diseases and injuries. Educational text, either retrieved from the Internet or provided by a doctor's office, is a popular method to communicate health-related information. Unfortunately, it is difficult to write text that is easy to understand, and existing approaches, mostly the application of readability formulas, have not convincingly been shown to reduce the difficulty of text.

OBJECTIVE

To develop an evidence-based writer support tool to improve perceived and actual text difficulty. To this end, we are developing and testing algorithms that automatically identify difficult sections in text and provide appropriate, easier alternatives; algorithms that effectively reduce text difficulty will be included in the support tool. This work describes the user evaluation with an independent writer of an automated simplification algorithm using term familiarity.

METHODS

Term familiarity indicates how easy words are for readers and is estimated using term frequencies in the Google Web Corpus. Unfamiliar words are algorithmically identified and tagged for potential replacement. Easier alternatives consisting of synonyms, hypernyms, definitions, and semantic types are extracted from WordNet, the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS), and Wiktionary and ranked for a writer to choose from to simplify the text. We conducted a controlled user study with a representative writer who used our simplification algorithm to simplify texts. We tested the impact with representative consumers. The key independent variable of our study is lexical simplification, and we measured its effect on both perceived and actual text difficulty. Participants were recruited from Amazon's Mechanical Turk website. Perceived difficulty was measured with 1 metric, a 5-point Likert scale. Actual difficulty was measured with 3 metrics: 5 multiple-choice questions alongside each text to measure understanding, 7 multiple-choice questions without the text for learning, and 2 free recall questions for information retention.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine participants completed the study. We found strong beneficial effects on both perceived and actual difficulty. After simplification, the text was perceived as simpler (P<.001) with simplified text scoring 2.3 and original text 3.2 on the 5-point Likert scale (score 1: easiest). It also led to better understanding of the text (P<.001) with 11% more correct answers with simplified text (63% correct) compared to the original (52% correct). There was more learning with 18% more correct answers after reading simplified text compared to 9% more correct answers after reading the original text (P=.003). There was no significant effect on free recall.

CONCLUSIONS

Term familiarity is a valuable feature in simplifying text. Although the topic of the text influences the effect size, the results were convincing and consistent.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/054e/3742397/c8b46486ffd3/jmir_v15i7e144_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/054e/3742397/4476901e2405/jmir_v15i7e144_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/054e/3742397/b5b39ba820bf/jmir_v15i7e144_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/054e/3742397/97f6b3ec8bd6/jmir_v15i7e144_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/054e/3742397/c8b46486ffd3/jmir_v15i7e144_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/054e/3742397/4476901e2405/jmir_v15i7e144_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/054e/3742397/b5b39ba820bf/jmir_v15i7e144_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/054e/3742397/97f6b3ec8bd6/jmir_v15i7e144_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/054e/3742397/c8b46486ffd3/jmir_v15i7e144_fig4.jpg
摘要

背景

足够的健康素养对于人们保持良好健康、管理疾病和伤痛至关重要。无论是从互联网获取还是由医生办公室提供的教育文本,都是传达健康相关信息的常用方式。不幸的是,写出易懂的文本并非易事,而现有的方法(大多是应用可读性公式)并未令人信服地证明能降低文本难度。

目的

开发一种基于证据的作者支持工具,以改善感知到的和实际的文本难度。为此,我们正在开发和测试能自动识别文本中难点部分并提供合适、更简单替代内容的算法;有效降低文本难度的算法将被纳入支持工具。这项工作描述了由一位独立作者对使用术语熟悉度的自动简化算法进行的用户评估。

方法

术语熟悉度表明读者对词汇的掌握难易程度,通过谷歌网络语料库中的词频来估计。算法会识别不熟悉的词汇并标记以便可能的替换。从WordNet、统一医学语言系统(UMLS)和维基词典中提取由同义词、上位词、定义和语义类型组成的更简单替代词,并排序供作者选择以简化文本。我们对一位有代表性的作者进行了一项对照用户研究,该作者使用我们的简化算法来简化文本。我们还测试了对有代表性消费者的影响。我们研究的关键自变量是词汇简化,我们测量了其对感知到的和实际的文本难度的影响。参与者从亚马逊的Mechanical Turk网站招募。感知难度用一个指标衡量,即5点李克特量表。实际难度用三个指标衡量:每个文本旁边有5个多项选择题以测量理解情况,无文本时有7个多项选择题用于学习,以及2个自由回忆问题用于信息保留。

结果

99名参与者完成了研究。我们发现对感知到的和实际的难度都有显著的有益影响。简化后,文本被认为更简单(P<.001),简化后的文本在5点李克特量表上得分为2.3,原始文本为3.2(分数1表示最容易)。它还使对文本的理解更好(P<.001),简化后的文本正确答案比原始文本多11%(简化文本为63%正确,原始文本为正确52%)。阅读简化文本后有更多学习效果,正确答案比阅读原始文本后多18%(阅读原始文本后正确答案多9%,P=.003)。对自由回忆没有显著影响。

结论

术语熟悉度是简化文本的一个有价值的特征。尽管文本主题会影响效应大小,但结果令人信服且一致。

相似文献

1
User evaluation of the effects of a text simplification algorithm using term familiarity on perception, understanding, learning, and information retention.用户对一种使用术语熟悉度的文本简化算法在感知、理解、学习和信息保留方面效果的评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Jul 31;15(7):e144. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2569.
2
Improving perceived and actual text difficulty for health information consumers using semi-automated methods.使用半自动方法提高健康信息消费者对文本难度的感知及实际文本难度。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2012;2012:522-31. Epub 2012 Nov 3.
3
A user-study measuring the effects of lexical simplification and coherence enhancement on perceived and actual text difficulty.一项用户研究测量了词汇简化和连贯性增强对感知和实际文本难度的影响。
Int J Med Inform. 2013 Aug;82(8):717-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.03.001. Epub 2013 Apr 29.
4
Evaluation of an online text simplification editor using manual and automated metrics for perceived and actual text difficulty.使用人工和自动指标评估在线文本简化编辑器的感知文本难度和实际文本难度。
JAMIA Open. 2022 May 30;5(2):ooac044. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac044. eCollection 2022 Jul.
5
Improving Consumer Understanding of Medical Text: Development and Validation of a New SubSimplify Algorithm to Automatically Generate Term Explanations in English and Spanish.提高消费者对医学文本的理解:一种用于自动生成英语和西班牙语术语解释的新型SubSimplify算法的开发与验证
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Aug 2;20(8):e10779. doi: 10.2196/10779.
6
The influence of text characteristics on perceived and actual difficulty of health information.文本特征对健康信息感知难度和实际难度的影响。
Int J Med Inform. 2010 Jun;79(6):438-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.02.002. Epub 2010 Mar 4.
7
Moving Beyond Readability Metrics for Health-Related Text Simplification.超越可读性指标进行健康相关文本简化。
IT Prof. 2016 May-Jun;18(3):45-51. doi: 10.1109/MITP.2016.50. Epub 2016 May 25.
8
The effect of word familiarity on actual and perceived text difficulty.词汇熟悉度对实际文本难度和感知文本难度的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Feb;21(e1):e169-72. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002172. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
9
The Role of Surface, Semantic and Grammatical Features on Simplification of Spanish Medical Texts: A User Study.表面、语义和语法特征对西班牙语医学文本简化的作用:一项用户研究。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Apr 16;2017:1322-1331. eCollection 2017.
10
Measuring Text Difficulty Using Parse-Tree Frequency.利用句法树频率测量文本难度
J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2017 Sep;68(9):2088-2100. doi: 10.1002/asi.23855. Epub 2017 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Text and Audio Simplification: Human vs. ChatGPT.文本与音频简化:人类与ChatGPT对比
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2024 May 31;2024:295-304. eCollection 2024.
2
Challenges and Opportunities for Professional Medical Publications Writers to Contribute to Plain Language Summaries (PLS) in an AI/ML Environment - A Consumer Health Informatics Systematic Review.专业医学出版物作者在人工智能/机器学习环境下为普通语言摘要(PLS)做出贡献所面临的挑战和机遇——消费者健康信息学系统评价。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2024 Jan 11;2023:709-717. eCollection 2023.
3
Assessing the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials in Obstetrics and Gynecology Using Traditional Measures: Comparative Analysis and Limitations.

本文引用的文献

1
Term Familiarity to indicate Perceived and Actual Difficulty of Text in Medical Digital Libraries.用术语熟悉度来表示医学数字图书馆中文本的感知难度和实际难度。
Digit Libraries Cult Herit Knowl Dissem Future Creat (2011). 2011 Oct;7008:307-310. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-24826-9_38.
2
Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?亚马逊土耳其机器人:一种新的廉价、高质量数据来源?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;6(1):3-5. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393980. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
3
A user-study measuring the effects of lexical simplification and coherence enhancement on perceived and actual text difficulty.
使用传统方法评估妇产科在线患者教育材料的可读性:比较分析与局限性。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 30;25:e46346. doi: 10.2196/46346.
4
Addressing and evaluating health literacy in mHealth: a scoping review.移动健康中健康素养的应对与评估:一项范围综述
Mhealth. 2022 Oct 30;8:33. doi: 10.21037/mhealth-22-11. eCollection 2022.
5
A survey of automated methods for biomedical text simplification.生物医学文本简化的自动化方法调查。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Oct 7;29(11):1976-1988. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac149.
6
An Informatics Framework to Assess Consumer Health Language Complexity Differences: Proof-of-Concept Study.一种评估消费者健康语言复杂性差异的信息学框架:概念验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 21;22(5):e16795. doi: 10.2196/16795.
7
Predicting Transition Words Between Sentence for English and Spanish Medical Text.预测英语和西班牙语医学文本中句子之间的过渡词。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2020 Mar 4;2019:523-531. eCollection 2019.
8
Crowdsourcing for Food Purchase Receipt Annotation via Amazon Mechanical Turk: A Feasibility Study.通过亚马逊土耳其机器人众包食品购买收据注释:一项可行性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 5;21(4):e12047. doi: 10.2196/12047.
9
Improving Consumer Understanding of Medical Text: Development and Validation of a New SubSimplify Algorithm to Automatically Generate Term Explanations in English and Spanish.提高消费者对医学文本的理解:一种用于自动生成英语和西班牙语术语解释的新型SubSimplify算法的开发与验证
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Aug 2;20(8):e10779. doi: 10.2196/10779.
10
The Role of Surface, Semantic and Grammatical Features on Simplification of Spanish Medical Texts: A User Study.表面、语义和语法特征对西班牙语医学文本简化的作用:一项用户研究。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Apr 16;2017:1322-1331. eCollection 2017.
一项用户研究测量了词汇简化和连贯性增强对感知和实际文本难度的影响。
Int J Med Inform. 2013 Aug;82(8):717-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.03.001. Epub 2013 Apr 29.
4
Improving perceived and actual text difficulty for health information consumers using semi-automated methods.使用半自动方法提高健康信息消费者对文本难度的感知及实际文本难度。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2012;2012:522-31. Epub 2012 Nov 3.
5
Assessing readability formula differences with written health information materials: application, results, and recommendations.评估阅读公式差异与书面健康信息材料:应用、结果和建议。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2013 Sep-Oct;9(5):503-16. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2012.05.009. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
6
Quality and readability of online patient information for abdominal aortic aneurysms.在线腹主动脉瘤患者信息的质量和可读性。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Jul;56(1):21-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.12.063. Epub 2012 Apr 21.
7
Acute low back pain information online: an evaluation of quality, content accuracy and readability of related websites.在线急性下背痛信息:相关网站的质量、内容准确性及可读性评估
Man Ther. 2012 Aug;17(4):318-24. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2012.02.019. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
8
Readability of online patient education materials on adult reconstruction Web sites.成人重建网站上在线患者教育材料的可读性。
J Arthroplasty. 2012 May;27(5):716-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.08.020. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
9
An examination of the relationship between reading comprehension, higher-level and lower-level reading sub-skills in adults.对成年人阅读理解、高级和低级阅读子技能之间关系的一项研究。
Read Writ. 2010 Jul 1;23(6):701-717. doi: 10.1007/s11145-009-9180-z.
10
Concussion information online: evaluation of information quality, content and readability of concussion-related websites. concussion 相关网站的信息质量、内容和可读性评估。
Br J Sports Med. 2012 Jul;46(9):675-83. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2010.081620. Epub 2011 Apr 18.