• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过亚马逊土耳其机器人众包食品购买收据注释:一项可行性研究。

Crowdsourcing for Food Purchase Receipt Annotation via Amazon Mechanical Turk: A Feasibility Study.

作者信息

Lu Wenhua, Guttentag Alexandra, Elbel Brian, Kiszko Kamila, Abrams Courtney, Kirchner Thomas R

机构信息

Department of Childhood Studies, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Camden, NJ, United States.

College of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 5;21(4):e12047. doi: 10.2196/12047.

DOI:10.2196/12047
PMID:30950801
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6473207/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The decisions that individuals make about the food and beverage products they purchase and consume directly influence their energy intake and dietary quality and may lead to excess weight gain and obesity. However, gathering and interpreting data on food and beverage purchase patterns can be difficult. Leveraging novel sources of data on food and beverage purchase behavior can provide us with a more objective understanding of food consumption behaviors.

OBJECTIVE

Food and beverage purchase receipts often include time-stamped location information, which, when associated with product purchase details, can provide a useful behavioral measurement tool. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility, reliability, and validity of processing data from fast-food restaurant receipts using crowdsourcing via Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk).

METHODS

Between 2013 and 2014, receipts (N=12,165) from consumer purchases were collected at 60 different locations of five fast-food restaurant chains in New Jersey and New York City, USA (ie, Burger King, KFC, McDonald's, Subway, and Wendy's). Data containing the restaurant name, location, receipt ID, food items purchased, price, and other information were manually entered into an MS Access database and checked for accuracy by a second reviewer; this was considered the gold standard. To assess the feasibility of coding receipt data via MTurk, a prototype set of receipts (N=196) was selected. For each receipt, 5 turkers were asked to (1) identify the receipt identifier and the name of the restaurant and (2) indicate whether a beverage was listed in the receipt; if yes, they were to categorize the beverage as cold (eg, soda or energy drink) or hot (eg, coffee or tea). Interturker agreement for specific questions (eg, restaurant name and beverage inclusion) and agreement between turker consensus responses and the gold standard values in the manually entered dataset were calculated.

RESULTS

Among the 196 receipts completed by turkers, the interturker agreement was 100% (196/196) for restaurant names (eg, Burger King, McDonald's, and Subway), 98.5% (193/196) for beverage inclusion (ie, hot, cold, or none), 92.3% (181/196) for types of hot beverage (eg, hot coffee or hot tea), and 87.2% (171/196) for types of cold beverage (eg, Coke or bottled water). When compared with the gold standard data, the agreement level was 100% (196/196) for restaurant name, 99.5% (195/196) for beverage inclusion, and 99.5% (195/196) for beverage types.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicated high interrater agreement for questions across difficulty levels (eg, single- vs binary- vs multiple-choice items). Compared with traditional methods for coding receipt data, MTurk can produce excellent-quality data in a lower-cost, more time-efficient manner.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9ad/6473207/1cf76219bc08/jmir_v21i4e12047_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9ad/6473207/aba0a0513962/jmir_v21i4e12047_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9ad/6473207/1cf76219bc08/jmir_v21i4e12047_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9ad/6473207/aba0a0513962/jmir_v21i4e12047_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9ad/6473207/1cf76219bc08/jmir_v21i4e12047_fig2.jpg
摘要

背景

个人对所购买和消费的食品及饮料产品做出的决策,会直接影响其能量摄入和饮食质量,并可能导致体重过度增加和肥胖。然而,收集和解读有关食品及饮料购买模式的数据可能具有难度。利用食品及饮料购买行为的新数据来源,能让我们对食品消费行为有更客观的认识。

目的

食品及饮料购买收据通常包含带时间戳的位置信息,当与产品购买细节相关联时,可提供一种有用的行为测量工具。本研究的目的是评估通过亚马逊土耳其机器人(MTurk)众包处理快餐餐厅收据数据的可行性、可靠性和有效性。

方法

2013年至2014年期间,在美国新泽西州和纽约市的5家快餐连锁店(即汉堡王、肯德基、麦当劳、赛百味和温迪)的60个不同地点收集了消费者购买收据(N = 12,165)。包含餐厅名称、位置、收据ID、购买的食品项目、价格及其他信息的数据被手动录入到一个MS Access数据库中,并由第二位审核人员检查准确性;这被视为金标准。为评估通过MTurk对收据数据进行编码的可行性,选择了一组收据原型(N = 196)。对于每张收据,要求5名土耳其机器人(turker)(1)识别收据标识符和餐厅名称,以及(2)指出收据中是否列出了饮料;如果是,他们要将饮料分类为冷饮(如汽水或能量饮料)或热饮(如咖啡或茶)。计算了针对特定问题(如餐厅名称和饮料包含情况)的审核人员间一致性,以及审核人员一致意见回复与手动录入数据集中金标准值之间的一致性。

结果

在审核人员完成的196张收据中,餐厅名称(如汉堡王、麦当劳和赛百味)的审核人员间一致性为100%(196/196),饮料包含情况(即热饮、冷饮或无)的一致性为98.5%(193/196),热饮类型(如热咖啡或热茶)的一致性为92.3%(181/196),冷饮类型(如可乐或瓶装水)的一致性为87.2%(171/196)。与金标准数据相比,餐厅名称的一致性水平为100%(196/196),饮料包含情况的一致性为99.5%(195/196),饮料类型的一致性为99.5%(195/196)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,对于不同难度水平的问题(如单项选择题、二元选择题和多项选择题),评分者间一致性较高。与传统的收据数据编码方法相比,MTurk能够以更低成本、更高效率的方式产生高质量的数据。

相似文献

1
Crowdsourcing for Food Purchase Receipt Annotation via Amazon Mechanical Turk: A Feasibility Study.通过亚马逊土耳其机器人众包食品购买收据注释:一项可行性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 5;21(4):e12047. doi: 10.2196/12047.
2
Energy contribution of sugar-sweetened beverage refills at fast-food restaurants.快餐店中含糖饮料续杯的能量贡献。
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Sep;20(13):2349-2354. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017000611. Epub 2017 May 9.
3
Correlates of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Purchased for Children at Fast-Food Restaurants.快餐店为儿童购买的含糖饮料的相关因素。
Am J Public Health. 2016 Nov;106(11):2038-2041. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303427.
4
Food and Beverage Selection Patterns among Menu Label Users and Nonusers: Results from a Cross-Sectional Study.菜单标签使用者与非使用者的食品和饮料选择模式:一项横断面研究的结果
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Jun;117(6):929-936. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2016.12.012. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
5
Rapid grading of fundus photographs for diabetic retinopathy using crowdsourcing.利用众包对糖尿病视网膜病变眼底照片进行快速分级。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Oct 30;16(10):e233. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3807.
6
Crowdsourcing participatory evaluation of medical pictograms using Amazon Mechanical Turk.利用亚马逊土耳其机器人众包参与式评估医学象形图
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Jun 3;15(6):e108. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2513.
7
Adolescent Purchasing Behavior at McDonald's and Subway.青少年在麦当劳和赛百味的购买行为。
J Adolesc Health. 2013 Oct;53(4):441-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.02.014. Epub 2013 May 6.
8
Feasibility, acceptability, and validity of crowdsourcing for collecting longitudinal alcohol use data.众包收集纵向酒精使用数据的可行性、可接受性和有效性。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2018 Jul;110(1):136-153. doi: 10.1002/jeab.445. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
9
Adults Who Order Sugar-Sweetened Beverages: Sociodemographics and Meal Patterns at Fast Food Chains.订购含糖饮料的成年人:快餐连锁店中的社会人口统计学和用餐模式。
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Dec;51(6):890-897. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.07.038. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
10
Predictors of total calories purchased at fast-food restaurants: restaurant characteristics, calorie awareness, and use of calorie information.预测在快餐店购买的总卡路里量的因素:餐厅特征、卡路里意识以及对卡路里信息的使用。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2013 Sep-Oct;45(5):404-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2013.01.019. Epub 2013 Apr 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Estimating helmet wearing rates via a scalable, low-cost algorithm: a novel integration of deep learning and google street view.通过可扩展的低成本算法估计头盔佩戴率:深度学习与谷歌街景的新颖融合。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 20;24(1):1645. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19118-0.
2
Crowdsourcing for Machine Learning in Public Health Surveillance: Lessons Learned From Amazon Mechanical Turk.公共卫生监测中机器学习的众包:从亚马逊土耳其机器人学到的经验教训。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 18;24(1):e28749. doi: 10.2196/28749.

本文引用的文献

1
Mapping of Crowdsourcing in Health: Systematic Review.健康领域众包的映射:系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 15;20(5):e187. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9330.
2
To what extent do food purchases reflect shoppers' diet quality and nutrient intake?食品购买在多大程度上反映了购物者的饮食质量和营养摄入情况?
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Apr 11;14(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0502-2.
3
PSYCHOLOGY. Mechanical Turk upends social sciences.心理学。亚马逊土耳其机器人平台颠覆了社会科学。
Science. 2016 Jun 10;352(6291):1263-4. doi: 10.1126/science.352.6291.1263.
4
Assessing Pictograph Recognition: A Comparison of Crowdsourcing and Traditional Survey Approaches.评估象形图识别:众包与传统调查方法的比较
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Dec 17;17(12):e281. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4582.
5
Five Years Later: Awareness Of New York City's Calorie Labels Declined, With No Changes In Calories Purchased.五年后:纽约市卡路里标签的知晓度下降,购买的卡路里量未发生变化。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Nov;34(11):1893-900. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0623.
6
Crowdsourcing in biomedicine: challenges and opportunities.生物医学中的众包:挑战与机遇。
Brief Bioinform. 2016 Jan;17(1):23-32. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbv021. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
7
Food availability/convenience and obesity.食物可得性/便利性与肥胖
Adv Nutr. 2014 Nov 14;5(6):809-17. doi: 10.3945/an.114.007070. Print 2014 Nov.
8
Cameras for Public Health Surveillance: A Methods Protocol for Crowdsourced Annotation of Point-of-Sale Photographs.用于公共卫生监测的摄像头:销售点照片众包标注的方法协议。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2014 Apr 9;3(2):e22. doi: 10.2196/resprot.3277.
9
Crowdsourcing applications for public health.众包在公共卫生中的应用。
Am J Prev Med. 2014 Feb;46(2):179-87. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.10.016.
10
User evaluation of the effects of a text simplification algorithm using term familiarity on perception, understanding, learning, and information retention.用户对一种使用术语熟悉度的文本简化算法在感知、理解、学习和信息保留方面效果的评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Jul 31;15(7):e144. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2569.