Malu Célestin Kaputu Kalala, Kahamba Daniel Mukeba, Walker Timothy David, Mukampunga Caritas, Musalu Eric Mafuta, Kokolomani Jacques, Mayamba Richard Mukendi Kavulu, Wilmshurst Jo M, Dubru Jean-Marie, Misson Jean-Paul
Service of Child Neurology, Kinshasa University Teaching Hospital, Democratic Republic of Congo
Service of Child Neurology, Kinshasa University Teaching Hospital, Democratic Republic of Congo.
J Child Neurol. 2014 Jul;29(7):895-902. doi: 10.1177/0883073813493501. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
In Sub-Saharan Africa, intrarectal diazepam is the first-line anticonvulsant mostly used in children. We aimed to assess this standard care against sublingual lorazepam, a medication potentially as effective and safe, but easier to administer. A randomized controlled trial was conducted in the pediatric emergency departments of 9 hospitals. A total of 436 children aged 5 months to 10 years with convulsions persisting for more than 5 minutes were assigned to receive intrarectal diazepam (0.5 mg/kg, n = 202) or sublingual lorazepam (0.1 mg/kg, n = 234). Sublingual lorazepam stopped seizures within 10 minutes of administration in 56% of children compared with intrarectal diazepam in 79% (P < .001). The probability of treatment failure is higher in case of sublingual lorazepam use (OR = 2.95, 95% CI = 1.91-4.55). Sublingual lorazepam is less efficacious in stopping pediatric seizures than intrarectal diazepam, and intrarectal diazepam should thus be preferred as a first-line medication in this setting.
在撒哈拉以南非洲地区,直肠内使用地西泮是儿童最常用的一线抗惊厥药物。我们旨在将这种标准治疗方法与舌下含服劳拉西泮进行评估对比,后者可能同样有效且安全,但更易于给药。在9家医院的儿科急诊科进行了一项随机对照试验。共有436名年龄在5个月至10岁之间、惊厥持续超过5分钟的儿童被分配接受直肠内地西泮(0.5毫克/千克,n = 202)或舌下含服劳拉西泮(0.1毫克/千克,n = 234)。与直肠内地西泮组79%的儿童相比,舌下含服劳拉西泮组56%的儿童在给药后10分钟内惊厥停止(P <.001)。使用舌下含服劳拉西泮时治疗失败的概率更高(OR = 2.95,95%CI = 1.91 - 4.55)。舌下含服劳拉西泮在停止儿童惊厥方面不如直肠内地西泮有效,因此在这种情况下,直肠内地西泮应作为一线药物优先选用。