Suppr超能文献

坐位三维被动椎间运动试验对颈痛患者活动度、终末感觉和疼痛激发的可靠性

Reliability of a seated three-dimensional passive intervertebral motion test for mobility, end-feel, and pain provocation in patients with cervicalgia.

作者信息

Manning Dana M, Dedrick Gregory S, Sizer Phillip S, Brismée Jean-Michel

机构信息

Results Physiotherapy, Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

J Man Manip Ther. 2012 Aug;20(3):135-41. doi: 10.1179/2042618611Y.0000000023.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Neck pain can be evaluated with passive intervertebral motion (PIVM). No study has evaluated the reliability of three-dimensional (3D) segmental PIVM testing of the cervical spine in symptomatic subjects in a functional, seated position. The purpose of this study was to evaluate inter-rater reliability of such 3D PIVM technique for pain provocation, hypomobility, and end-feel detection.

METHODS

Subjects (n = 63), age 44±15·6 years, neck pain 3·4±1·6 cm with visual analog scale, were evaluated by two of three raters with varied manual therapy education and experience. To perform the test, the rater passively invoked side-bending motion at each cervical joint from C2-C3 to C6-C7, allowing segmental synkinetic rotation and extension to occur. Each joint was assessed for hypomobility, hard end-feel, and pain provocation. Kappa statistics were used to determine the inter-rater reliability for each variable for joints C2-C3 through C6-C7 for both the most painful and least painful sides.

RESULTS

Percent agreements for pain provocation, hypomobility, and end-feel ranged 65-83%, 62-84%, and 68-87%, respectively. Kappa values for pain provocation, hypomobility, and end-feel on the most painful side were fair to moderate (0·29-0·53, 0·21-0·48, and 0·25-0·50, respectively), and on the least painful side were fair to substantial (0·43-0·65, 0·33-0·58, and 0·28-0·60, respectively).

DISCUSSION

This is the first investigation to assess reliability of 3D cervical segmental testing in sitting and to assess reliability of end-feel. The seated 3D PIVM test has sufficient clinical reliability for use in patients with cervicalgia for the assessment of hypomobility, end-feel, and pain provocation.

摘要

目的

颈部疼痛可通过被动椎间运动(PIVM)进行评估。尚无研究评估在有症状的受试者处于功能性坐姿时,颈椎三维(3D)节段性PIVM测试的可靠性。本研究的目的是评估这种3D PIVM技术在疼痛激发、活动度降低和终末感觉检测方面的评分者间可靠性。

方法

63名年龄为44±15.6岁、视觉模拟量表显示颈部疼痛为3.4±1.6 cm的受试者,由三名评分者中的两名进行评估,这两名评分者接受过不同的手法治疗教育且经验各异。为进行测试,评分者在每个颈椎关节(从C2-C3至C6-C7)被动引发侧弯运动,允许节段性联合旋转和伸展发生。对每个关节评估活动度降低、硬终末感觉和疼痛激发情况。使用kappa统计量确定C2-C3至C6-C7关节在最痛侧和最不痛侧的每个变量的评分者间可靠性。

结果

疼痛激发、活动度降低和终末感觉的百分一致性分别为65-83%、62-84%和68-87%。最痛侧疼痛激发、活动度降低和终末感觉的kappa值为一般至中等(分别为0.29-0.53、0.21-0.48和0.25-0.50),最不痛侧为一般至较高(分别为0.43-0.65、0.33-0.58和0.28-0.60)。

讨论

这是首次评估坐姿下3D颈椎节段性测试的可靠性以及终末感觉可靠性的研究。坐姿3D PIVM测试在评估颈部疼痛患者的活动度降低、终末感觉和疼痛激发方面具有足够的临床可靠性。

相似文献

6
Thoracic segmental flexion during cervical forward bending.颈椎前屈时的胸椎节段性屈曲。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 1993 Jan 1;3(4):80-5. doi: 10.3233/BMR-1993-3412.

本文引用的文献

1
Identification of the correct cervical level by palpation of spinous processes.通过触诊棘突来确定正确的颈椎水平。
Anesth Analg. 2011 May;112(5):1232-5. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182110f9f. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
7
Coupling behavior of the thoracic spine: a systematic review of the literature.胸椎的耦合行为:文献系统综述
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2007 Jun;30(5):390-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2007.04.009.
9
10
Coupling behavior of the cervical spine: a systematic review of the literature.颈椎的耦合行为:文献系统综述
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006 Sep;29(7):570-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.06.020.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验