Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Department of Clinical Chemistry, Laboratory Medical Immunology, Amsterdam UMC, Location VU Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 8;12(3):e055748. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055748.
Joint mobilisation and manipulation often results in immediate pain relief in people with neck pain. However, the biological mechanisms behind pain relief are largely unknown. There is preliminary evidence that joint mobilisation and manipulation lessens the upregulated neuroimmune responses in people with persistent neck pain.
This study protocol describes a randomised placebo-controlled trial to investigate whether joint mobilisation and manipulation influence neuroimmune responses in people with persistent neck pain. People with persistent neck pain (N=100) will be allocated, in a randomised and concealed manner, to the experimental or control group (ratio 3:1). Short-term (ie, baseline, immediately after and 2 hours after the intervention) neuroimmune responses will be assessed, such as inflammatory marker concentration following in vitro stimulation of whole blood cells, systemic inflammatory marker concentrations directly from blood samples, phenotypic analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and serum cortisol. Participants assigned to the experimental group (N=75) will receive cervical mobilisations targeting the painful and/or restricted cervical segments and a distraction manipulation of the cervicothoracic junction. Participants assigned to the control group (N=25) will receive a placebo mobilisation and placebo manipulation. Using linear mixed models, the short-term neuroimmune responses will be compared (1) between people in the experimental and control group and (2) within the experimental group, between people who experience a good outcome and those with a poor outcome. Furthermore, the association between the short-term neuroimmune responses and pain relief following joint mobilisation and manipulation will be tested in the experimental group.
This trial is approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Amsterdam University Medical Centre, location VUmc (Approval number: 2018.181).
NL6575 (trialregister.nl.
关节松动术和关节推拿术通常可立即缓解颈部疼痛患者的疼痛。然而,其缓解疼痛的生物学机制在很大程度上尚不清楚。有初步证据表明,关节松动术和关节推拿术减轻了持续性颈部疼痛患者的神经免疫反应上调。
本研究方案描述了一项随机安慰剂对照试验,旨在研究关节松动术和关节推拿术是否会影响持续性颈部疼痛患者的神经免疫反应。将以随机和隐蔽的方式将 100 名持续性颈部疼痛患者分配到实验组或对照组(比例为 3:1)。将短期(即基线、干预后即刻和干预后 2 小时)神经免疫反应进行评估,例如体外刺激全血后炎性标志物浓度、直接从血样中测量系统炎性标志物浓度、外周血单个核细胞表型分析和血清皮质醇。分配到实验组(N=75)的参与者将接受针对疼痛和/或受限颈椎节段的颈椎松动术以及颈胸交界处的牵伸性手法。分配到对照组(N=25)的参与者将接受安慰剂松动术和安慰剂手法。使用线性混合模型,将比较(1)实验组和对照组之间的短期神经免疫反应,(2)实验组内,治疗效果好的人和治疗效果差的人之间的短期神经免疫反应。此外,将在实验组中检验关节松动术和关节推拿术后的短期神经免疫反应与疼痛缓解之间的关联。
本试验已获得阿姆斯特丹大学医学中心 VUmc 医学伦理委员会的批准(批准号:2018.181)。
NL6575(trialregister.nl.