• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童颈部淋巴结病的评估:诊断方法的优缺点

Evaluation of cervical lymphadenopathy in children: advantages and drawbacks of diagnostic methods.

作者信息

Ingolfsdottir Maria, Balle Viggo, Hahn Christoffer Holst

机构信息

Ear, Nose & Throat Department, Gentofte Hospital.

出版信息

Dan Med J. 2013 Aug;60(8):A4667.

PMID:23905561
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Cervical lymphadenopathy (LAP) in children is a common clinical diagnostic dilemma. The aim of our study was to analyse ultrasonography, fine needle aspiration biopsy, size and location on the neck to distinguish lymph nodes requiring excision from those that do not.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively studied 43 cervical lymph nodes that were excised from 43 children aged 0-16 years. We studied the histology of the removed lymph nodes and compared them in terms of size, location, ultrasonography and fine needle aspiration biopsy. Patients were divided into four groups: reactive, malignant, granuloma and other.

RESULTS

The cause of LAP was reactive in 30 patients (70%), malignant in five (12%) and granulomatous in six (14%) of the surgically removed lymph nodes. Size, age and ultrasonographic findings were not correlated with a higher risk of malignancy. However, the risk of malignancy was significantly higher when the LAP was located in the supraclavicular region than in other cervical regions (p = 0.008). Fine needle aspiration biopsy was made preoperatively in 27 cases (63%) and revealed five (19%) nodes to be malignant and 18 (67%) to be due to a reactive cause. The positive predictive value for benign and malignant cause was 91.3% and 75% (p = 0.01), respectively.

CONCLUSION

We recommend excisional biopsy if LAP is suspected to be malignant or is located in the supraclavicular region. In case of chronic LAP with no obvious infectious cause or suspected mycobacteria, we recommend fine needle aspiration biopsy as a diagnostic tool. Clinical control and diagnosing of children with LAP should lie in few, skilled hands.

FUNDING

not relevant.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

not relevant.

摘要

引言

儿童颈部淋巴结病是临床常见的诊断难题。本研究旨在分析超声检查、细针穿刺活检、颈部淋巴结大小及位置,以区分需要切除的淋巴结与无需切除的淋巴结。

材料与方法

我们回顾性研究了从43名0至16岁儿童切除的43个颈部淋巴结。我们研究了切除淋巴结的组织学,并在大小、位置、超声检查和细针穿刺活检方面进行了比较。患者分为四组:反应性、恶性、肉芽肿性和其他。

结果

手术切除的淋巴结中,30例(70%)颈部淋巴结病的病因是反应性的,5例(12%)是恶性的,6例(14%)是肉芽肿性的。大小、年龄和超声检查结果与较高的恶性风险无关。然而,当颈部淋巴结病位于锁骨上区域时,恶性风险显著高于其他颈部区域(p = 0.008)。27例(63%)术前进行了细针穿刺活检,其中5例(19%)淋巴结为恶性,18例(67%)为反应性病因。良性和恶性病因的阳性预测值分别为91.3%和75%(p = 0.01)。

结论

如果怀疑颈部淋巴结病是恶性的或位于锁骨上区域,我们建议进行切除活检。对于无明显感染病因或疑似分枝杆菌的慢性颈部淋巴结病,我们建议将细针穿刺活检作为诊断工具。儿童颈部淋巴结病的临床管理和诊断应由少数技术熟练的人员负责。

资金来源

无关。

试验注册

无关。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of cervical lymphadenopathy in children: advantages and drawbacks of diagnostic methods.儿童颈部淋巴结病的评估:诊断方法的优缺点
Dan Med J. 2013 Aug;60(8):A4667.
2
Sonographic assessment of cervical lymphadenopathy: role of high-resolution and color Doppler imaging.超声评估颈部淋巴结病变:高分辨率及彩色多普勒成像的作用。
Head Neck. 2011 Mar;33(3):297-302. doi: 10.1002/hed.21448.
3
Evaluation of the efficacy of colour Doppler ultrasound in diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy.彩色多普勒超声诊断颈部淋巴结病的疗效评估。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008 May;37(4):205-12. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/57023901.
4
Evaluation of peripheral lymphadenopathy with excisional biopsy: six-year experience.通过切除活检评估外周淋巴结病:六年经验
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015 Nov 1;8(11):15234-9. eCollection 2015.
5
Clinical value of fine needle aspiration cytology in pediatric cervical lymphadenopathy patients under 12-years-of-age.细针穿刺细胞学检查在12岁以下儿童颈部淋巴结病患者中的临床价值
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Jan;78(1):79-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.10.054. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
6
Fine-needle aspiration of superficial and deeply seated lymph nodes on patients with and without a history of malignancy: review of 439 cases.对有和没有恶性肿瘤病史患者的浅表和深部淋巴结进行细针穿刺活检:439例病例回顾
Diagn Cytopathol. 2003 Dec;29(6):315-9. doi: 10.1002/dc.10346.
7
Fine needle aspiration cytology for lymph nodes: a three-year study.淋巴结细针穿刺细胞学检查:一项为期三年的研究。
Br J Biomed Sci. 2016;73(1):28-31. doi: 10.1080/09674845.2016.1144947. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
8
Incidence and predictors of malignancy in children with persistent cervical lymphadenopathy.持续性颈部淋巴结病患儿恶性肿瘤的发病率及预测因素
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Dec;77(12):2004-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.09.022. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
9
Endosonography-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of intra-abdominal lymph nodes with unknown primary in a tuberculosis endemic region.在结核病流行地区,经超声内镜引导对不明原因原发性腹腔内淋巴结进行细针抽吸细胞学检查。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Dec;26(12):1721-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06800.x.
10
When does an enlarged cervical lymph node in a child need excision? A systematic review.儿童颈部淋巴结肿大何时需要切除?一项系统评价。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Mar;78(3):393-401. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.12.011. Epub 2013 Dec 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors for malignancy in pediatric subacute/chronic focal craniocervical lymphadenopathy.儿童亚急性/慢性局灶性颅颈淋巴结病的恶性肿瘤危险因素。
Front Pediatr. 2025 Jan 30;12:1466116. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1466116. eCollection 2024.
2
Peripheral adenopathies in children - an attempt of clinical morphological profile.儿童外周淋巴结病——临床形态学特征分析。
Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2020 Oct-Dec;61(4):1193-1212. doi: 10.47162/RJME.61.4.21.
3
Diagnosis of nontuberculous mycobacterial lymphadenitis: the role of fine-needle aspiration.
非结核分枝杆菌淋巴结炎的诊断:细针抽吸的作用。
Eur J Pediatr. 2021 Apr;180(4):1279-1286. doi: 10.1007/s00431-020-03875-2. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
4
Level 5 Lymphadenopathy Warrants Heightened Suspicion for Clinically Significant Pathology.5级淋巴结病提示高度怀疑存在具有临床意义的病理状况。
Head Neck Pathol. 2016 Dec;10(4):509-512. doi: 10.1007/s12105-016-0733-6. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
5
Predictive factors for malignancy in patients with persistent cervical lymphadenopathy.持续性颈淋巴结病患者恶性肿瘤的预测因素。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Jan;273(1):251-6. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3717-3. Epub 2015 Jul 18.