Siegel Jason T, Crano William D, Alvaro Eusebio M, Lac Andrew, Hackett Justin D, Hohman Zachary P
a 1School of Behavioral and Organizational Science, Claremont Graduate University , Claremont, California, USA.
b 2Department of Psychology, Loyola Marymount University , Los Angeles, California, USA.
Subst Use Misuse. 2014 Jan 1;49(1-2):30-40. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2013.817427. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
This quasi-experimental secondary analysis, funded by NIDA, employed data from a national sample of 1,968 US adolescents, collected from 1999 to 2003, self-classified as resolutely anti-marijuana on the first two yearly assessments (T1 and 2). At T3, respondents remained resolute non-users, or had moved to vulnerable non-use or use. Analysis of variance indicated that users at T3 were significantly heavier users of tobacco and alcohol, and reported significantly less intense parental monitoring, than those who did not initiate marijuana use. Furthermore, categorizing non-users as either resolute or vulnerable revealed behavioral patterns that otherwise would have been unidentified. Implications for prevention are discussed.
这项由美国国家药物滥用研究所(NIDA)资助的准实验性二次分析,采用了1999年至2003年期间从1968名美国青少年全国样本中收集的数据,这些青少年在前两次年度评估(T1和T2)中自我归类为坚决反对使用大麻。在T3时,受访者要么仍坚决不使用,要么已转变为易受影响的不使用者或使用者。方差分析表明,与未开始使用大麻的人相比,T3时的使用者吸烟和饮酒量显著更高,且报告的父母监督强度显著更低。此外,将不使用者分为坚决型或易受影响型揭示了原本无法识别的行为模式。文中讨论了对预防工作的启示。