• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优化儿童、成人和婴儿的后座环境。

Optimizing the rear seat environment for older children, adults, and infants.

机构信息

University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, 2901 Baxter Rd., Ann Arbor,MI 48109, USA.

出版信息

Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14 Suppl:S13-22. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.796043.

DOI:10.1080/15389588.2013.796043
PMID:23905625
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Our recent rear seat safety research found that more-forward and higher lap belt anchorage locations and much shorter and stiffer seat cushions can improve the protection of older children from 6 to 12 years old who are using the vehicle belt without a booster. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the optimal rear seat restraint systems for adults and infants are consistent with those for older children.

METHODS

We conducted sensitivity analyses and design optimizations for adults and for infants in a rear-facing child restraint system (CRS) using a set of MADYMO models, an automated simulation framework, and occupant belt-fit and posture prediction models from our previous studies. A series of 12 sled tests was also used to validate the computational models.

RESULTS

The optimal belt anchorage locations and the seat cushion length for older children, adults, and rear-facing CRS-seated infants conflict with each other. In particular, more-forward lap belt anchorage locations that prevent submarining for older children would reduce the protection to both adults and CRS-seated infants, although the protection is still acceptable based on regulated injury criteria. A shorter seat cushion could provide optimal protection to older children and adults but would significantly increase the CRS rotation.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study suggested that adaptive/adjustable restraint systems are necessary to simultaneously improve the rear seat occupant protection for all age groups. Supplemental materials are available for this article. Go to the publisher's online edition of Traffic Injury Prevention to view the supplemental file.

摘要

目的

我们最近的后排座椅安全研究发现,更靠前和更高的安全带锚固位置,以及更短和更硬的座椅垫,可以改善 6 至 12 岁儿童在不使用增高垫的情况下使用车辆安全带的保护。本研究的目的是研究成人和婴儿的最佳后排约束系统是否与大龄儿童的一致。

方法

我们使用一组 MADYMO 模型、一个自动化模拟框架以及我们之前研究中的乘员安全带贴合和姿势预测模型,对成人和婴儿反向乘坐的儿童约束系统(CRS)进行了敏感性分析和设计优化。还进行了一系列 12 次碰撞测试,以验证计算模型。

结果

大龄儿童、成人和反向 CRS 座椅婴儿的最佳安全带锚固位置和座椅垫长度相互冲突。特别是,更靠前的安全带锚固位置可以防止大龄儿童的潜水,但会降低对成人和 CRS 座椅婴儿的保护,尽管根据规定的损伤标准,保护仍然可以接受。较短的座椅垫可以为大龄儿童和成人提供最佳保护,但会显著增加 CRS 的旋转。

结论

本研究结果表明,需要自适应/可调约束系统来同时改善所有年龄段的后排座椅乘员保护。本文提供了补充材料。访问交通伤害预防出版商的在线版本以查看补充文件。

相似文献

1
Optimizing the rear seat environment for older children, adults, and infants.优化儿童、成人和婴儿的后座环境。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14 Suppl:S13-22. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.796043.
2
Rear seat restraint system optimization for older children in frontal crashes.针对正面碰撞中大龄儿童的后排座椅约束系统优化。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14(6):614-22. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2012.743123.
3
Kinematics of pediatric crash dummies seated on vehicle seats with realistic belt geometry.儿童碰撞假人在具有真实安全带几何形状的汽车座椅上的运动学。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(8):866-74. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.890720.
4
Assessment of vehicle and restraint design changes for mitigating rear seat occupant injuries.评估车辆和约束系统设计的改变,以减轻后排乘客受伤的风险。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(7):711-9. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.867433.
5
Optimizing Seat Belt and Airbag Designs for Rear Seat Occupant Protection in Frontal Crashes.优化安全带和安全气囊设计以保护正面碰撞中后排乘客
Stapp Car Crash J. 2017 Nov;61:67-100. doi: 10.4271/2017-22-0004.
6
Effects of vehicle seat and belt geometry on belt fit for children with and without belt positioning booster seats.有无儿童座椅定位垫时,车辆座椅和安全带几何形状对安全带贴合度的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Jan;50:512-22. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.05.030. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
7
A matched-cohort analysis of belted front and rear seat occupants in newer and older model vehicles shows that gains in front occupant safety have outpaced gains for rear seat occupants.对新款和老款车辆中系安全带的前后排座椅乘客进行的匹配队列分析表明,前排乘客的安全收益超过了后排座椅乘客的安全收益。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Nov;42(6):1974-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.06.002. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
8
Effects of LATCH versus Available Seatbelt Installation of Rear Facing Child Restraint Systems on Head Injury Criteria for 6 Month Old Infants in Rear End Collisions.后向儿童约束系统的LATCH与可用安全带安装方式对6个月大婴儿在追尾碰撞中头部损伤标准的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S16-23. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1067804.
9
Safety priorities for occupant protection in rear impacts.后碰撞中乘员保护的安全重点。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2023;24(3):155-172. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2023.2171177. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
10
Injuries to belted older children in motor vehicle crashes.机动车碰撞事故中系安全带大龄儿童的损伤情况。
Accid Anal Prev. 2008 Nov;40(6):2024-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2008.08.018. Epub 2008 Sep 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Adaptive restraint design for a diverse population through machine learning.通过机器学习为多样化人群设计适应性约束。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 10;11:1202970. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1202970. eCollection 2023.