Wahbeh Ayman M
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Exp Clin Transplant. 2013 Aug;11(4):320-3. doi: 10.6002/ect.2013.0009.
There are conflicting data on using the Cockroft-Gault formula and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula to assess graft function in kidney transplants. This study uses a cohort of Jordanian kidney transplant patients to assess performance of the Cockroft-Gault formula and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equations by using the criterion standard of measured creatinine clearance.
Creatinine clearance measured by 24-hour urine creatinine in patients with a kidney transplant was compared with the estimated clearance using the Cockroft-Gault formula and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equations. Correlation, limits of agreement, and concordance analyses were used.
There was a positive correlation between both the Cockcroft-Gault (r=0.878; P < .001) and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (r=0.732; P < .001) equations with creatinine clearance. The former was statistically superior (P = .0416). Using Bland-Altman plots, the limits of agreement were wide for both methods. After log transformation, the limits of agreement were -0.06 to +0.27 for the Cockcroft-Gault formula, and -0.21 to + 0.26 for the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease. Concordance analyses showed a correlation coefficient of 0.7384 (95% CI: 0.6134 to 0.8273) when the Cockcroft-Gault formula was used, and 0.7257 (95% CI: 0.5622 to 0.8345) for the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease. Pearson P coefficient (precision) and bias correction factor Cb (accuracy) for the Cockcroft-Gault formula and for the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease were 0.8762, 0.8427, 0.7324, and 0.9908.
In Jordanian patients with a renal transplant, although the Cockcroft-Gault formula performed slightly better than the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation in estimating creatinine clearance, neither of these equations can accurately predict renal graft function.
关于使用Cockcroft-Gault公式和肾病饮食改良公式评估肾移植受者的移植肾功能,现有数据存在冲突。本研究采用一组约旦肾移植患者,以实测肌酐清除率作为标准,评估Cockcroft-Gault公式和肾病饮食改良公式的性能。
将肾移植患者通过24小时尿肌酐测得的肌酐清除率与使用Cockcroft-Gault公式和肾病饮食改良公式估算的清除率进行比较。采用相关性分析、一致性界限分析和一致性分析。
Cockcroft-Gault公式(r = 0.878;P <.001)和肾病饮食改良公式(r = 0.732;P <.001)与肌酐清除率均呈正相关。前者在统计学上更优(P = 0.0416)。使用Bland-Altman图,两种方法的一致性界限均较宽。对数转换后,Cockcroft-Gault公式一致性界限为-0.06至+0.27,肾病饮食改良公式为-0.21至+0.26。一致性分析显示,使用Cockcroft-Gault公式时相关系数为0.7384(95%CI:0.6134至0.8273),肾病饮食改良公式为0.7257(95%CI:0.5622至0.8345)。Cockcroft-Gault公式和肾病饮食改良公式的Pearson P系数(精密度)和偏差校正因子Cb(准确度)分别为0.8762、0.8427、0.7324和0.9908。
在约旦肾移植患者中,虽然Cockcroft-Gault公式在估算肌酐清除率方面比肾病饮食改良公式表现稍好,但这两个公式均不能准确预测肾移植功能。