Suppr超能文献

约旦成年肾移植受者中肌酐清除率估算值与常规测量清除率的比较。

Comparison of creatinine clearance estimates with routine measured clearance in adult Jordanians with a kidney transplant.

作者信息

Wahbeh Ayman M

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.

出版信息

Exp Clin Transplant. 2013 Aug;11(4):320-3. doi: 10.6002/ect.2013.0009.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

There are conflicting data on using the Cockroft-Gault formula and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula to assess graft function in kidney transplants. This study uses a cohort of Jordanian kidney transplant patients to assess performance of the Cockroft-Gault formula and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equations by using the criterion standard of measured creatinine clearance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Creatinine clearance measured by 24-hour urine creatinine in patients with a kidney transplant was compared with the estimated clearance using the Cockroft-Gault formula and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equations. Correlation, limits of agreement, and concordance analyses were used.

RESULTS

There was a positive correlation between both the Cockcroft-Gault (r=0.878; P < .001) and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (r=0.732; P < .001) equations with creatinine clearance. The former was statistically superior (P = .0416). Using Bland-Altman plots, the limits of agreement were wide for both methods. After log transformation, the limits of agreement were -0.06 to +0.27 for the Cockcroft-Gault formula, and -0.21 to + 0.26 for the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease. Concordance analyses showed a correlation coefficient of 0.7384 (95% CI: 0.6134 to 0.8273) when the Cockcroft-Gault formula was used, and 0.7257 (95% CI: 0.5622 to 0.8345) for the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease. Pearson P coefficient (precision) and bias correction factor Cb (accuracy) for the Cockcroft-Gault formula and for the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease were 0.8762, 0.8427, 0.7324, and 0.9908.

CONCLUSIONS

In Jordanian patients with a renal transplant, although the Cockcroft-Gault formula performed slightly better than the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation in estimating creatinine clearance, neither of these equations can accurately predict renal graft function.

摘要

目的

关于使用Cockcroft-Gault公式和肾病饮食改良公式评估肾移植受者的移植肾功能,现有数据存在冲突。本研究采用一组约旦肾移植患者,以实测肌酐清除率作为标准,评估Cockcroft-Gault公式和肾病饮食改良公式的性能。

材料与方法

将肾移植患者通过24小时尿肌酐测得的肌酐清除率与使用Cockcroft-Gault公式和肾病饮食改良公式估算的清除率进行比较。采用相关性分析、一致性界限分析和一致性分析。

结果

Cockcroft-Gault公式(r = 0.878;P <.001)和肾病饮食改良公式(r = 0.732;P <.001)与肌酐清除率均呈正相关。前者在统计学上更优(P = 0.0416)。使用Bland-Altman图,两种方法的一致性界限均较宽。对数转换后,Cockcroft-Gault公式一致性界限为-0.06至+0.27,肾病饮食改良公式为-0.21至+0.26。一致性分析显示,使用Cockcroft-Gault公式时相关系数为0.7384(95%CI:0.6134至0.8273),肾病饮食改良公式为0.7257(95%CI:0.5622至0.8345)。Cockcroft-Gault公式和肾病饮食改良公式的Pearson P系数(精密度)和偏差校正因子Cb(准确度)分别为0.8762、0.8427、0.7324和0.9908。

结论

在约旦肾移植患者中,虽然Cockcroft-Gault公式在估算肌酐清除率方面比肾病饮食改良公式表现稍好,但这两个公式均不能准确预测肾移植功能。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验