Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK.
Eur Heart J. 2013 Oct;34(38):2940-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht295. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
The aim of this study was to determine the extent to which adherence to individual vascular medications, assessed by different methods, influences the absolute and relative risks (RRs) of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality.
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective epidemiological studies (cohort, nested case-control, or clinical trial) identified through electronic searches using MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases, involving adult populations (≥ 18 years old) and reporting risk estimates of cardiovascular medication adherence with any CVD (defined as any fatal or non-fatal coronary heart disease, stroke or sudden cardiac death) and/or all-cause mortality (defined as mortality from any cause) outcomes. Relative risks were combined using random-effects models. Forty-four unique prospective studies comprising 1 978 919 non-overlapping participants, with 135 627 CVD events and 94 126 cases of all-cause mortality. Overall, 60% (95% CI: 52-68%) of included participants had good adherence (adherence ≥ 80%) to cardiovascular medications. The RRs (95% CI) of development of CVD in those with good vs. poor (<80%) adherence were 0.85 (0.81-0.89) and 0.81 (0.76-0.86) for statins and antihypertensive medications, respectively. Corresponding RRs of all-cause mortality were 0.55 (0.46-0.67) and 0.71 (0.64-0.78) for good adherence to statins and antihypertensive agents. These associations remained consistent across subgroups representing different study characteristics. Estimated absolute risk differences for any CVD associated with poor medication adherence were 13 cases for any vascular medication, 9 cases for statins and 13 cases for antihypertensive agents, per 100 000 individuals per year.
A substantial proportion of people do not adhere adequately to cardiovascular medications, and the prevalence of suboptimal adherence is similar across all individual CVD medications. Absolute and relative risk assessments demonstrate that a considerable proportion of all CVD events (~9% in Europe) could be attributed to poor adherence to vascular medications alone, and that the level of optimal adherence confers a significant inverse association with subsequent adverse outcomes. Measures to enhance adherence to help maximize the potentials of effective cardiac therapies in the clinical setting are urgently required.
本研究旨在确定通过不同方法评估的个体血管药物治疗依从性对心血管疾病(CVD)和全因死亡率的绝对风险(RR)和相对风险(RR)的影响程度。
我们通过电子检索 MEDLINE、Web of Science、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 数据库,对前瞻性流行病学研究(队列、嵌套病例对照或临床试验)进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,这些研究涉及成年人群(≥18 岁),并报告了心血管药物治疗依从性与任何 CVD(定义为任何致命或非致命性冠心病、中风或心源性猝死)和/或全因死亡率(定义为任何原因导致的死亡率)结局的风险估计值。使用随机效应模型合并相对风险。44 项独特的前瞻性研究共纳入 1978919 名无重叠参与者,其中 135627 例 CVD 事件和 94126 例全因死亡率。总体而言,60%(95%CI:52-68%)的纳入参与者对心血管药物治疗具有良好的依从性(依从性≥80%)。在良好依从性(≥80%)与不良依从性(<80%)的参与者中,CVD 发生的 RR(95%CI)分别为 0.85(0.81-0.89)和 0.81(0.76-0.86),分别为他汀类药物和抗高血压药物。良好依从性与他汀类药物和抗高血压药物相关的全因死亡率的相应 RR 分别为 0.55(0.46-0.67)和 0.71(0.64-0.78)。这些关联在代表不同研究特征的亚组中保持一致。与药物治疗依从性差相关的任何 CVD 的估计绝对风险差异为,每 100000 人每年任何血管药物治疗 13 例,他汀类药物 9 例,抗高血压药物 13 例。
相当一部分人不能充分依从心血管药物治疗,而且所有个体 CVD 药物的依从性不足的发生率都相似。绝对风险和相对风险评估表明,相当一部分 CVD 事件(欧洲约为 9%)可能仅归因于血管药物治疗依从性差,而最佳依从性水平与随后的不良结局呈显著负相关。迫切需要采取措施提高依从性,以最大限度地发挥有效的心脏治疗在临床环境中的潜力。