Suppr超能文献

西妥昔单抗在头颈部局部晚期鳞状细胞癌中的应用:EMR 062202-006 试验结果的普遍性。

Cetuximab in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: generalizability of EMR 062202-006 trial results.

机构信息

Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Woudestein, J5-51, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands,

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Jun;271(6):1673-8. doi: 10.1007/s00405-013-2646-2. Epub 2013 Aug 2.

Abstract

In a randomized controlled trial in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA SCCHN), treatment with RT plus cetuximab resulted in improved survival compared to treatment with RT alone. Uncertainty exists about the generalizability of the trial results for the Dutch healthcare setting due to possible discrepancies in treatment allocation. Retrospective patient chart review was performed for 141 patients treated with first line RT plus cetuximab or RT alone, diagnosed in 2007-2010 in two head and neck treatment centers. Combined with aggregated population-based data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and patient level clinical trial data, use of cetuximab in Dutch daily practice was assessed through comparison of patient characteristics, treatment characteristics and treatment outcomes between trial and daily practice. 61 daily practice patients fulfilled the selection criteria. In line with Dutch guidelines, RT plus cetuximab is prescribed in patients requiring combined therapy unfit to receive traditional platinum-based chemotherapeutics. These patients have unfavorable baseline characteristics, due to selection on--amongst others--high age of the patients. Beyond 1 year after treatment start, patients treated with RT plus cetuximab in daily practice died earlier than patients treated with RT plus cetuximab in the trial. Selective treatment allocation in daily practice limits generalizability of EMR 062202-006 trial results. Evidence is needed about the effectiveness of RT plus cetuximab compared to other treatments for patients with unfavorable clinical baseline characteristics.

摘要

在一项针对局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌(LA SCCHN)患者的随机对照试验中,与单独接受放疗相比,联合使用放疗和西妥昔单抗可提高生存率。由于治疗分配可能存在差异,该试验结果对于荷兰医疗保健环境的推广性存在不确定性。对 2007 年至 2010 年在两个头颈部治疗中心接受一线放疗联合西妥昔单抗或单独放疗治疗的 141 名患者进行了回顾性病历审查。结合荷兰癌症登记处的汇总人群数据和患者水平的临床试验数据,通过比较试验和日常实践中的患者特征、治疗特征和治疗结果,评估了西妥昔单抗在荷兰日常实践中的使用情况。61 名日常实践患者符合选择标准。根据荷兰指南,需要联合治疗且不适合接受传统铂类化疗的患者联合使用放疗和西妥昔单抗。这些患者的基线特征较差,这是由于选择了患者年龄较高等因素。治疗开始后 1 年以上,在日常实践中接受放疗联合西妥昔单抗治疗的患者比在试验中接受放疗联合西妥昔单抗治疗的患者更早死亡。日常实践中的选择性治疗分配限制了 EMR 062202-006 试验结果的推广性。需要有证据表明对于具有不利临床基线特征的患者,放疗联合西妥昔单抗与其他治疗方法相比的有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验