van der Linden N, van Gils C W M, Pescott C P, Buter J, Vergeer M R, Groot C A Uyl-de
Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA), Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands,
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Aug;272(8):2007-16. doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-3106-3. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
Clinical trial EMR 62202-006 demonstrates prolonged median locoregional control (24.4 vs. 14.9 months), progression-free survival (17.1 vs. 12.4 months) and overall survival (49.0 vs. 29.3 months) for patients who receive cetuximab added to the comparator radiotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA SCCHN). In the Netherlands, hospitals receive reimbursement for cetuximab conditional on cost-effectiveness in daily practice. To estimate the real-world incremental cost per quality adjusted life-year (QALY) gained for radiotherapy + cetuximab over radiotherapy alone in first line treatment of LA SCCHN, a Markov model is constructed with health states "alive without progression", "alive following progression" and "death". Transition probabilities per month are estimated from clinical trial data and retrospectively collected real-world data from two Dutch head and neck cancer treatment centres (2007-2010, n = 141). 5-year, 10-year and lifetime horizons are used, without and with discounting (4 % costs, 1.5 % effects) to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Two scenarios explore different assumptions on prognosis of real-world versus trial patients. Adding cetuximab to radiotherapy results in increased costs and health gains in both scenarios and across each of the time horizons. Incremental costs per QALY gained range between
临床试验EMR 62202 - 006表明,对于接受西妥昔单抗联合对照放疗治疗局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌(LA SCCHN)的患者,其局部区域控制的中位时间延长(24.4个月对14.9个月)、无进展生存期延长(17.1个月对12.4个月)以及总生存期延长(49.0个月对29.3个月)。在荷兰,医院只有在西妥昔单抗在日常实践中具有成本效益的情况下才能获得报销。为了估计在LA SCCHN一线治疗中,放疗联合西妥昔单抗相对于单纯放疗每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的实际增量成本,构建了一个马尔可夫模型,其健康状态包括“无进展存活”、“进展后存活”和“死亡”。每月的转移概率根据临床试验数据以及从荷兰两个头颈癌治疗中心回顾性收集的实际数据(2007 - 2010年,n = 141)进行估计。采用5年、10年和终身的时间范围,分别在不考虑贴现和考虑贴现(成本4%,效果1.5%)的情况下计算增量成本效益比。两种情景探讨了关于实际患者与试验患者预后的不同假设。在两种情景以及每个时间范围内,放疗联合西妥昔单抗都会导致成本增加和健康获益。在基础病例中,每获得一个QALY的增量成本在14,624欧元至38,543欧元之间。对于每QALY支付意愿为80,000欧元的情况,不同情景的可接受性曲线显示,放疗联合西妥昔单抗相对于单纯放疗具有成本效益的概率在0.76至0.87之间。当前结果表明,放疗联合西妥昔单抗的联合治疗对于LA SCCHN患者是一种具有成本效益的治疗选择。