Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuropsychology, Section Neuropsychology, University Hospital RWTH University , Aachen , Germany.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jul 30;7:373. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00373. eCollection 2013.
The combined efficacy of space- and alertness related training in chronic hemineglect was tested behaviorally and in a longitudinal fMRI study. Earlier results had shown that both space as well as alertness related training as single intervention methods lead to short term improvement which, however, is not stable for longer time periods. The neurobiological data obtained in these studies revealed differential cortical reorganization patterns for the two training approaches thereby leading to the hypothesis that a combination of both trainings might result in stronger and longer lasting effects. The results of our current study, however, - at least at first glance - do not clearly corroborate this hypothesis, because neither alertness training alone nor the combination with OKS on the group level led to significant behavioral improvement, although four of the six patients after alertness and even more after combined training showed a higher percentage of behavioral improvement than during baseline. Despite the lack of clearcut behavioral training induced improvement we found right parietal or fronto-parietal increase of activation in the imaging data immediately after combined training and at follow-up 3 weeks later. The study design had called for splitting up training time between the two training approaches in order to match total training time with our earlier single training studies. The results of our current study are discussed as a possible consequence of reduced training time and intensity of both training measures under the combined training situation.
联合空间和警觉相关训练对慢性偏侧忽略的疗效进行了行为和纵向 fMRI 研究测试。早期结果表明,空间和警觉相关训练作为单一干预方法都能在短期内提高,但在较长时间内并不稳定。这些研究中的神经生物学数据显示出两种训练方法的皮质重组模式存在差异,从而提出了这样一种假设,即两种训练方法的结合可能会产生更强和更持久的效果。然而,我们目前研究的结果——至少乍一看——并没有清楚地证实这一假设,因为单独的警觉训练或与 OKS 结合在组水平上都没有导致显著的行为改善,尽管六名患者中的四名在警觉训练后,甚至在联合训练后,行为改善的百分比都高于基线。尽管行为训练诱导的改善不明显,但我们在联合训练后和 3 周后的随访中发现了右侧顶叶或额顶叶的激活增加。研究设计要求在两种训练方法之间分配训练时间,以匹配总训练时间和我们之前的单一训练研究。我们当前研究的结果被认为是由于联合训练情况下两种训练措施的训练时间和强度减少所致。