Degutis Joseph M, Van Vleet Thomas M
Geriatric Research Education Clinical Center, Boston VA Healthcare System Boston, MA, USA.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2010 Aug 24;4. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00060. eCollection 2010.
Hemispatial neglect is a debilitating disorder marked by a constellation of spatial and non-spatial attention deficits. Patients' alertness deficits have shown to interact with lateralized attention processes and correspondingly, improving tonic/general alertness as well as phasic/moment-to-moment alertness has shown to ameliorate spatial bias. However, improvements are often short-lived and inconsistent across tasks and patients. In an attempt to more effectively activate alertness mechanisms by exercising both tonic and phasic alertness, we employed a novel version of a continuous performance task (tonic and phasic alertness training, TAPAT). Using a between-subjects longitudinal design and employing sensitive outcome measures of spatial and non-spatial attention, we compared the effects of 9 days of TAPAT (36 min/day) in a group of patients with chronic neglect (N = 12) with a control group of chronic neglect patients (N = 12) who simply waited during the same training period. Compared to the control group, the group trained on TAPAT significantly improved on both spatial and non-spatial measures of attention with many patients failing to exhibit a lateralized attention bias at the end of training. TAPAT was effective for patients with a range of behavioral profiles and lesions, suggesting that its effectiveness may rely on distributed or lower-level attention mechanisms that are largely intact in patients with neglect. In a follow-up experiment, to determine if TAPAT is more effective in improving spatial attention than an active treatment that directly trains spatial attention, we trained three chronic neglect patients on both TAPAT and search training. In all three patients, TAPAT training was more effective in improving spatial attention than search training suggesting that, in chronic neglect, training alertness is a more effective treatment approach than directly training spatial attention.
半侧空间忽视是一种使人衰弱的疾病,其特征是一系列空间和非空间注意力缺陷。患者的警觉性缺陷已被证明与单侧化注意力过程相互作用,相应地,改善持续性/一般性警觉以及阶段性/即时警觉已被证明可减轻空间偏差。然而,改善往往是短暂的,并且在不同任务和患者之间不一致。为了通过锻炼持续性和阶段性警觉来更有效地激活警觉机制,我们采用了一种新型的连续性能任务(持续性和阶段性警觉训练,TAPAT)。使用组间纵向设计并采用空间和非空间注意力的敏感结果测量方法,我们比较了一组慢性忽视患者(N = 12)进行9天TAPAT训练(每天36分钟)的效果与另一组慢性忽视患者(N = 12)的效果,后者在相同训练期间只是等待。与对照组相比,接受TAPAT训练的组在空间和非空间注意力测量方面均有显著改善,许多患者在训练结束时未表现出单侧化注意力偏差。TAPAT对具有一系列行为特征和损伤的患者有效,这表明其有效性可能依赖于在忽视患者中基本完好的分布式或较低水平的注意力机制。在一项后续实验中,为了确定TAPAT在改善空间注意力方面是否比直接训练空间注意力的积极治疗更有效,我们对三名慢性忽视患者进行了TAPAT和搜索训练。在所有三名患者中,TAPAT训练在改善空间注意力方面比搜索训练更有效,这表明在慢性忽视中,训练警觉性是比直接训练空间注意力更有效的治疗方法。