• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Experiences of housing insecurity among participants of an early childhood intervention programme.

作者信息

Turnbull H, Loptson K, Muhajarine N

机构信息

Saskatchewan Population Health and Evaluation Research Unit, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.

出版信息

Child Care Health Dev. 2014 May;40(3):435-40. doi: 10.1111/cch.12091. Epub 2013 Aug 5.

DOI:10.1111/cch.12091
PMID:23909646
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To understand the barriers to programme success among high-needs families in KidsFirst, an early childhood intervention programme.

METHODS

Using a qualitative approach, a secondary analysis was performed using the qualitative data set (111 interviews and focus groups with 242 participants) from the KidsFirst programme evaluation. Data analysis was conducted to identify common experiences among high-needs families in the programme and barriers to programme success.

RESULTS

Participants identified housing insecurity as a major factor impeding programme delivery, retention and successful outcomes. Housing insecurity was shown to create or exacerbate ongoing crises among high-needs families. Only after housing insecurity was addressed were families able to benefit from the KidsFirst programme.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this research suggest that until baseline material security is established for high-needs families, early childhood development (ECD) interventions will be limited in meeting their objectives. In order to have the most effect for those living in poverty, helping families to achieve basic material security, including secure housing, should precede the targeted provision of psychosocial ECD supports. This finding has implications for how ECD intervention programmes could more effectively be designed and whom they should target.

摘要

相似文献

1
Experiences of housing insecurity among participants of an early childhood intervention programme.
Child Care Health Dev. 2014 May;40(3):435-40. doi: 10.1111/cch.12091. Epub 2013 Aug 5.
2
Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with 'best practice' recommendations.降低儿童和青少年肥胖及相关慢性病风险:证据综合与“最佳实践”建议
Obes Rev. 2006 Feb;7 Suppl 1:7-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00242.x.
3
Heat or eat: the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program and nutritional and health risks among children less than 3 years of age.取暖还是吃饭:低收入家庭能源援助计划与3岁以下儿童的营养和健康风险
Pediatrics. 2006 Nov;118(5):e1293-302. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2943.
4
Bringing health home: householder and provider perspectives on the healthy housing programme in Auckland, New Zealand.将健康带回家:新西兰奥克兰家庭主妇与提供者对健康住房项目的看法。
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Mar;66(5):1185-96. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.038. Epub 2008 Jan 10.
5
Community interventions to promote healthy social environments: early childhood development and family housing. A report on recommendations of the Task Force on Community Preventive Services.促进健康社会环境的社区干预措施:幼儿发展与家庭住房。社区预防服务特别工作组建议报告。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2002 Feb 1;51(RR-1):1-8.
6
Early intervention care programme for parents of neonates.针对新生儿父母的早期干预护理计划。
Curationis. 2005 Aug;28(3):54-63.
7
Play@home in practice: health visitors' views of perceived facilitators and barriers to programme implementation.实际中的居家活动:健康访视员对项目实施中感知到的促进因素和障碍的看法。
Community Pract. 2013 Jul;86(7):32-5.
8
The design and implementation of early childhood intervention programs: informing efforts to address risk and promote resilience.幼儿干预项目的设计与实施:为应对风险和促进恢复力的努力提供信息。
J Prev Interv Community. 2014;42(4):243-7. doi: 10.1080/10852352.2014.943640.
9
The implications of US experiences with early childhood interventions for the UK Sure Start Programme.美国幼儿干预经验对英国“确保开端”计划的启示。
Child Care Health Dev. 2007 Nov;33(6):655-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2006.00682.x.
10
Included but isolated: early intervention programmes provision for children and families with chronic respiratory support needs.纳入但独立:为有慢性呼吸支持需求的儿童和家庭提供早期干预计划。
Child Care Health Dev. 2008 May;34(3):373-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2008.00823.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Parents' Experiences of Receiving Professional Support Through Extended Home Visits During Pregnancy and Early Childhood-A Phenomenographic Study.父母在孕期和幼儿期接受延伸家访专业支持的体验:一项现象学研究。
Front Public Health. 2021 Feb 22;9:578917. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.578917. eCollection 2021.
2
A better start for health equity? Qualitative content analysis of implementation of extended postnatal home visiting in a disadvantaged area in Sweden.健康公平的更好起点?瑞典贫困地区扩展产后家访实施情况的定性内容分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Apr 10;17(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0756-6.