Department of Neurobiology, A. I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Epilepsia. 2013 Aug;54 Suppl 4(0 4):35-43. doi: 10.1111/epi.12297.
Several preclinical proof-of-concept studies have provided evidence for positive treatment effects on epileptogenesis. However, none of these hypothetical treatments has advanced to the clinic. The experience in other fields of neurology such as stroke, Alzheimer's disease, or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis has indicated several problems in the design of preclinical studies, which likely contribute to failures in translating the positive preclinical data to the clinic. The Working Group on "Issues related to development of antiepileptogenic therapies" of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) and the American Epilepsy Society (AES) has considered the possible problems that arise when moving from proof-of-concept antiepileptogenesis (AEG) studies to preclinical AEG trials, and eventually to clinical AEG trials. This article summarizes the discussions and provides recommendations on how to design a preclinical AEG monotherapy trial in adult animals. We specifically address study design, animal and model selection, number of studies needed, issues related to administration of the treatment, outcome measures, statistics, and reporting. In addition, we give recommendations for future actions to advance the preclinical AEG testing.
几项临床前概念验证研究为抗癫痫发生治疗的积极效果提供了证据。然而,这些假设的治疗方法都没有进入临床。在其他神经科领域(如中风、阿尔茨海默病或肌萎缩侧索硬化症)的经验表明,临床前研究的设计存在一些问题,这些问题可能导致将阳性临床前数据转化为临床失败。国际抗癫痫联盟(ILAE)和美国癫痫学会(AES)的“抗癫痫发生治疗发展相关问题”工作组已经考虑了从抗癫痫发生(AEG)概念验证研究到临床前 AEG 试验,最终到临床 AEG 试验,可能出现的问题。本文总结了讨论结果,并就如何设计成人动物的临床前 AEG 单药治疗试验提供了建议。我们特别针对研究设计、动物和模型选择、所需研究数量、治疗管理相关问题、结果测量、统计学和报告进行了探讨。此外,我们还为推进临床前 AEG 测试提出了未来行动的建议。