Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, VA Long Beach Healthcare System, Long Beach, CA 90822, USA.
Arthroscopy. 2013 Sep;29(9):1492-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.05.031. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
Our purpose was to investigate the effect of supraspinatus tendon tear combined with anterior capsulolabral injury on glenohumeral joint biomechanics and to identify which structures should be repaired when both pathologic conditions are present.
Eight cadaveric shoulders were tested on a custom system. Five conditions were tested: intact supraspinatus full-thickness tear, supraspinatus tear combined with Bankart lesion, supraspinatus repair, and supraspinatus repair combined with Bankart repair. Rotational range of motion, glenohumeral kinematics, and the force required for anteroinferior dislocation were measured at 30° and 60° of glenohumeral abduction. Repeated-measures analysis of variance with Tukey post hoc test was used for statistical analysis.
Bankart lesions combined with supraspinatus tears significantly increased total rotational range of motion (7.6° ± 6.3° at 30° of glenohumeral abduction and 14.1° ± 10.3° at 60° of glenohumeral abduction; P < .05). Bankart lesions combined with supraspinatus tears also significantly decreased the force required for dislocation normalized to range of motion (26.6% ± 21.0% at 60° of abduction) compared with intact shoulders (P = .04). Bankart repair combined with supraspinatus repair restored range of motion and the force required for dislocation; however, Bankart repair combined with supraspinatus repair shifted the humeral head posteriorly at the midrange of rotation in 30° and 60° of abduction (P < .05).
Supraspinatus tendon tears combined with Bankart lesions increased humeral rotational range of motion and decreased the force required for dislocation. Repair of both pathologic conditions successfully restored range of motion and increased the force required for dislocation.
Both supraspinatus tendon and anterior labral repair are suggested for patients with combined Bankart lesions and supraspinatus tears to restore shoulder function and possibly prevent recurrent dislocation. However, when repairing both pathologic conditions, care should be taken not to overtighten the joint, which may lead to stiffness or osteoarthritis.
本研究旨在探讨冈上肌腱撕裂合并前关节囊盂唇损伤对盂肱关节生物力学的影响,并确定在存在这两种病理情况时应修复哪些结构。
对 8 具尸体肩关节进行了定制系统测试。共测试了 5 种情况:完整的冈上肌腱全层撕裂、冈上肌腱撕裂合并 Bankart 损伤、冈上肌腱修复、冈上肌腱修复合并 Bankart 修复。在盂肱关节外展 30°和 60°时,测量旋转活动范围、盂肱关节运动学和前下脱位所需的力。采用重复测量方差分析和 Tukey 事后检验进行统计学分析。
Bankart 损伤合并冈上肌腱撕裂显著增加了总旋转活动范围(盂肱关节外展 30°时为 7.6°±6.3°,盂肱关节外展 60°时为 14.1°±10.3°;P<.05)。Bankart 损伤合并冈上肌腱撕裂还显著降低了相对于完整肩关节的脱位所需力与活动范围的比值(盂肱关节外展 60°时为 26.6%±21.0%;P=.04)。Bankart 修复联合冈上肌腱修复恢复了活动范围和脱位所需的力;然而,Bankart 修复联合冈上肌腱修复在盂肱关节外展 30°和 60°时使肱骨头向后移位(P<.05)。
冈上肌腱撕裂合并 Bankart 损伤增加了肱骨旋转活动范围,降低了脱位所需的力。修复这两种病理情况成功地恢复了活动范围并增加了脱位所需的力。
对于同时存在 Bankart 病变和冈上肌腱撕裂的患者,建议同时修复冈上肌腱和前盂唇,以恢复肩关节功能并可能预防复发性脱位。然而,在修复这两种病理情况时,应注意不要过度收紧关节,这可能导致僵硬或骨关节炎。