Suppr超能文献

加拿大非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者冠状动脉造影的使用情况和时机及相关院内转归:来自加拿大急性冠状动脉事件全球登记研究的结果。

Use and timing of coronary angiography and associated in-hospital outcomes in Canadian non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: insights from the Canadian Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events.

机构信息

Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Cardiol. 2013 Nov;29(11):1429-35. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2013.04.035. Epub 2013 Jul 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although an early invasive approach has become standard strategy for the management of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), the frequency and timing in Canada is uncertain.

METHODS

We examined the use and timing of coronary angiography, revascularization, and cardiovascular outcomes of NSTEMI patients: (1) admitted on weekdays vs weekends; and (2) stratified according to presentation risk level, in the Canadian Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE)/Expanded GRACE (GRACE(2))/Canadian Registry of Acute Coronary Events (CANRACE) population.

RESULTS

Of 6711 NSTEMI patients, 1956 (29.1%) were admitted on the weekend. The median (interquartile range) wait time for coronary angiography was 58 (32-106) and 70 (50-112) hours for weekday and weekend patients, respectively (P = 0.32). Compared with lower-intermediate risk, higher-risk patients were less likely to undergo angiography (44.7% vs 69.7% for weekdays and 45.2% vs 69.6% for weekends; both P < 0.0001) and waited longer for angiography (median 71 vs 61 hours; P < 0.0001). Weekend admission was independently associated with higher mortality (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-2.01; P = 0.004), recurrent ischemia (adjusted OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.32; P = 0.03), and heart failure (adjusted OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.00-1.63; P = 0.048) but not with reinfarction.

CONCLUSIONS

Median wait time for angiography in Canadian NSTEMI patients admitted on the weekend was not significantly longer than for those who presented on a weekday. Patients admitted on weekends had higher adjusted mortality and cardiovascular event rates. Higher-risk patients were less likely to undergo angiography and waited longer, with higher observed in-hospital event rates. Systematic, guideline-recommended risk stratification should be considered to ensure that optimal management strategies (eg, timely coronary angiography in higher-risk patients) are matched to level of risk.

摘要

背景

尽管早期侵入性方法已成为非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)管理的标准策略,但在加拿大,其应用频率和时间尚不确定。

方法

我们研究了 NSTEMI 患者的冠状动脉造影、血运重建和心血管结局的使用和时间:(1)在工作日与周末入院;(2)根据就诊风险水平分层,在加拿大全球急性冠状动脉事件登记处(GRACE)/扩展 GRACE(GRACE(2))/加拿大急性冠状动脉事件登记处(CANRACE)人群中。

结果

在 6711 例 NSTEMI 患者中,1956 例(29.1%)在周末入院。与工作日患者相比,周末患者接受冠状动脉造影的中位(四分位距)等待时间分别为 58(32-106)和 70(50-112)小时(P = 0.32)。与低-中危患者相比,高危患者更不可能接受血管造影检查(工作日分别为 44.7%和 69.7%,周末分别为 45.2%和 69.6%;均 P<0.0001),且血管造影等待时间更长(中位时间分别为 71 小时和 61 小时;均 P<0.0001)。周末入院与更高的死亡率(校正优势比[OR],1.52;95%置信区间[CI],1.15-2.01;P = 0.004)、复发性缺血(校正 OR,1.16;95%CI,1.01-1.32;P = 0.03)和心力衰竭(校正 OR,1.28;95%CI,1.00-1.63;P = 0.048)独立相关,但与再梗死无关。

结论

加拿大 NSTEMI 患者周末入院与工作日入院相比,接受血管造影的中位等待时间并无显著延长。周末入院的患者校正死亡率和心血管事件发生率更高。高危患者更不可能接受血管造影检查,且等待时间更长,观察到的院内事件发生率更高。应考虑进行系统的、符合指南的风险分层,以确保将最佳管理策略(例如,高危患者的及时冠状动脉造影)与风险水平相匹配。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验