Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.
Psicothema. 2013;25(3):336-41. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2012.265.
Not everyone considers breaches of environmental laws as reprehensible behaviors or to the same extent. Research on the causal explanations of illegal anti-ecological behavior given by individuals is useful to analyze the social support of environmental laws and their consolidation as social and/or personal norms. This study aims to analyze the explanations selected by participants as most likely for environmental transgressions perpetrated by other persons in participants' surroundings.
573 persons of both genders, aged between 17 and 74 years, living in a setting of high environmental protection answered a questionnaire including seven environmental breaches and 11 scales related to the amount of punishment that they would mete out to perpetrators, and possible causal explanations of the facts being described.
Data show that people generally consider illegal anti-ecological behavior as a reflection of the "badness" of perpetrators, but that certain circumstances can lead anyone to behave illegally in environmental terms.
These results are discussed comparing participants' explanations with the explanations given by environmental transgressors in previous studies.
并非每个人都认为违反环境法是应受谴责的行为,或者认为其严重程度相同。研究个人对非法反生态行为的因果解释有助于分析环境法的社会支持及其作为社会和/或个人规范的巩固。本研究旨在分析参与者选择的最有可能导致其周围其他人环境违规的解释。
573 名性别为男女、年龄在 17 至 74 岁之间的人,居住在环境保护水平较高的环境中,回答了一份包括七种环境违规行为和 11 个与他们对违法者的惩罚程度以及对所描述事实的可能因果解释相关的量表的问卷。
数据表明,人们普遍认为非法反生态行为反映了违法者的“恶劣”,但某些情况可能导致任何人在环境方面违法。
将参与者的解释与之前研究中环境违规者的解释进行比较,讨论了这些结果。