Department of Management Science and Institute of Statistics, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwán.
Psicothema. 2013;25(3):402-7. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2012.221.
Effect size reporting and interpreting practices have been extensively recommended in academic journals when analyzing primary outcomes of all empirical studies. Accordingly, the sample squared multiple correlation coefficient is the commonly reported strength of association index in practical applications of multiple linear regression.
This paper examines the sample size procedures proposed by Bonett and Wright for precise interval estimation of the squared multiple correlation coefficient.
The simulation results showed that their simple method for attaining the desired precision of expected width provides satisfactory results only when sample sizes are large. Moreover, the suggested sample size formula for achieving the designated assurance probability is inaccurate and problematic.
According to these findings, their sample size procedures are not recommended.
当分析所有实证研究的主要结果时,学术期刊广泛推荐报告和解释效应大小的做法。因此,在多元线性回归的实际应用中,样本平方复相关系数是常用的关联强度指标。
本文检验了 Bonett 和 Wright 提出的样本量程序,用于精确区间估计平方复相关系数。
模拟结果表明,他们获得期望宽度所需精度的简单方法仅在样本量较大时才提供令人满意的结果。此外,用于达到指定保证概率的建议样本量公式是不准确和有问题的。
根据这些发现,不建议使用他们的样本量程序。