Rix Keith J B
Department of Law, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK.
J Forensic Leg Med. 2013 Aug;20(6):659-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2013.03.036. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
In some countries and some jurisdictions health professionals are involved in the process of capital punishment. Their involvement raises difficult ethical issues and the more so with changing attitudes to, and growing support for, assisted suicide, greater respect for autonomy and more universal promotion of human rights, including those of prisoners. These issues are discussed in relation to the various stages of the capital punishment process from the investigation of a potential capital offence to the removal of executed prisoners' tissues and organs for transplantation. It is suggested that some of the ethical difficulties can be resolved, or at least ameliorated, by having regard to the three core concepts of medical ethics: autonomy, best interests and rights. But active involvement of health professionals in capital punishment, however justified ethically, runs the risk that 'reforms' will even more deeply entrench what remains of the death penalty, thus making it more resistant to complete repeal.
在一些国家和某些司法管辖区,卫生专业人员参与了死刑执行过程。他们的参与引发了棘手的伦理问题,而随着对协助自杀的态度转变和支持增加、对自主权的更多尊重以及包括囚犯权利在内的人权更广泛推广,这些问题变得更加突出。本文将围绕死刑执行过程的各个阶段展开讨论,从对潜在死罪的调查到摘取被处决囚犯的组织和器官用于移植。有人认为,通过考虑医学伦理的三个核心概念:自主权、最大利益和权利,一些伦理困境可以得到解决,或至少得到缓解。但是,卫生专业人员积极参与死刑执行,无论在伦理上多么合理,都存在一种风险,即“改革”会使死刑残余更加根深蒂固,从而使其更难被彻底废除。