Department of Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Eur J Radiol. 2013 Oct;82(10):e537-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.06.024. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
To determine the feasibility of texture analysis for the classification of gastric adenocarcinoma, lymphoma, and gastrointestinal stromal tumors on contrast-enhanced hydrodynamic-MDCT images.
The arterial phase scans of 47 patients with adenocarcinoma (AC) and a histologic tumor grade of [AC-G1, n=4, G1, n=4; AC-G2, n=7; AC-G3, n=16]; GIST, n=15; and lymphoma, n=5, and the venous phase scans of 48 patients with AC-G1, n=3; AC-G2, n=6; AC-G3, n=14; GIST, n=17; lymphoma, n=8, were retrospectively reviewed. Based on regions of interest, texture analysis was performed, and features derived from the gray-level histogram, run-length and co-occurrence matrix, absolute gradient, autoregressive model, and wavelet transform were calculated. Fisher coefficients, probability of classification error, average correlation coefficients, and mutual information coefficients were used to create combinations of texture features that were optimized for tumor differentiation. Linear discriminant analysis in combination with a k-nearest neighbor classifier was used for tumor classification.
On arterial-phase scans, texture-based lesion classification was highly successful in differentiating between AC and lymphoma, and GIST and lymphoma, with misclassification rates of 3.1% and 0%, respectively. On venous-phase scans, texture-based classification was slightly less successful for AC vs. lymphoma (9.7% misclassification) and GIST vs. lymphoma (8% misclassification), but enabled the differentiation between AC and GIST (10% misclassification), and between the different grades of AC (4.4% misclassification). No texture feature combination was able to adequately distinguish between all three tumor types.
Classification of different gastric tumors based on textural information may aid radiologists in establishing the correct diagnosis, at least in cases where the differential diagnosis can be narrowed down to two histological subtypes.
确定对比增强动力-MDCT 图像纹理分析在胃腺癌、淋巴瘤和胃肠道间质瘤分类中的可行性。
回顾性分析 47 例经组织学证实的腺癌(AC)患者(肿瘤分级为[AC-G1,n=4,G1;AC-G2,n=7;AC-G3,n=16])、15 例胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)患者和 5 例淋巴瘤患者的动脉期扫描图像,以及 48 例经组织学证实的 AC-G1 患者(n=3)、AC-G2 患者(n=6)、AC-G3 患者(n=14)、GIST 患者(n=17)和淋巴瘤患者(n=8)的静脉期扫描图像。基于感兴趣区进行纹理分析,计算灰度直方图、游程和共生矩阵、绝对梯度、自回归模型和小波变换的特征。使用 Fisher 系数、分类错误概率、平均相关系数和互信息系数来创建纹理特征组合,以优化肿瘤分化。线性判别分析结合 k-最近邻分类器用于肿瘤分类。
在动脉期扫描中,基于纹理的病变分类在区分 AC 和淋巴瘤以及 GIST 和淋巴瘤方面非常成功,误诊率分别为 3.1%和 0%。在静脉期扫描中,基于纹理的分类对于 AC 与淋巴瘤(误诊率 9.7%)和 GIST 与淋巴瘤(误诊率 8%)的效果略差,但能够区分 AC 和 GIST(误诊率 10%),以及不同分级的 AC(误诊率 4.4%)。没有任何纹理特征组合能够充分区分这三种肿瘤类型。
基于纹理信息对不同胃肿瘤进行分类可能有助于放射科医生做出正确诊断,至少在可以将鉴别诊断缩小到两种组织学亚型的情况下。