Suppr超能文献

未经控制的癫痫并不一定等同于耐药性癫痫:新诊断的癫痫患者和慢性癫痫患者之间的人群差异。

Uncontrolled epilepsy is not necessarily the same as drug-resistant epilepsy: differences between populations with newly diagnosed epilepsy and chronic epilepsy.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Epilepsy Behav. 2013 Oct;29(1):4-6. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.06.019. Epub 2013 Aug 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A proportion of patients with seemingly "uncontrolled" epilepsy could still control their epilepsy with further pharmacological manipulations. It is possible that their epilepsy might not be truly "drug-resistant". We audited the patients with "uncontrolled epilepsy" using the recent ILAE definition of drug-resistant epilepsy.

METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy at Glasgow and patients with chronic epilepsy treated in Hong Kong were independently assessed at their last clinic visit. If the patient was not seizure-free, the epilepsy was considered "uncontrolled". In this latter situation, if the patient had adequate trials of two or more tolerated, appropriately chosen, and appropriately used AED schedules, the epilepsy was classified as "drug-resistant" in accordance with the ILAE definition. If not, the outcome was classified as "undefined", and the reason(s) for this was documented.

RESULTS

In the newly diagnosed cohort with uncontrolled epilepsy (n=311), outcome was "undefined" in 175 (56%). The most common reasons were trying just one AED usually at the patient's behest (n=68; 39%); intermittent compliance (60; 34%); adverse effects at low dosage (51; 29%); inadequate dosing (49; 28%); social issues such as imprisonment, alcohol, and recreational drug use (34; 19%); psychiatric problems affecting documentation, attendance, etc. (32; 18%); patient choice accepting less than optimal control (14; 8%); and seizure freedom of less than 12 months (12.7%). In the chronic cohort of 194 patients with uncontrolled epilepsy, drug responsiveness was "undefined" in just 79 (41%). The most common reasons were inadequate use of the AED(s) (35; 44%), followed by a lack of information on treatment response in the medical records (18; 23%) and failure of only one adequately used AED (11; 14%).

CONCLUSION

Uncontrolled epilepsy is not necessarily the same as drug-resistant epilepsy. Efforts should be made to understand why a patient is not seizure-free so that appropriate adjustment in AED regimen can be taken to enable the patient to attain long-term seizure freedom.

摘要

背景

一部分看似“未得到控制”的癫痫患者可能通过进一步的药物治疗仍能控制癫痫。他们的癫痫可能并非真正的“耐药”。我们使用最近的 ILAE 耐药性癫痫定义来审查这些患有“未得到控制的癫痫”的患者。

方法

在格拉斯哥新诊断的癫痫患者和在香港接受慢性癫痫治疗的患者在最近一次就诊时进行独立评估。如果患者没有无发作,那么癫痫被认为“未得到控制”。在后一种情况下,如果患者已充分尝试了两种或更多种耐受、适当选择和适当使用的 AED 方案,那么根据 ILAE 定义,癫痫被归类为“耐药性”。否则,结果被归类为“未定义”,并记录了原因。

结果

在新诊断为未得到控制的癫痫患者队列(n=311)中,175 例(56%)的结果为“未定义”。最常见的原因是仅尝试一种 AED,通常是在患者的要求下(n=68;39%);间歇性依从性(60;34%);低剂量时出现不良反应(51;29%);剂量不足(49;28%);社会问题如监禁、酗酒和滥用娱乐性药物(34;19%);影响文档记录、就诊等的精神问题(32;18%);患者选择接受低于最佳控制的药物(14;8%);以及无发作时间少于 12 个月(12.7%)。在 194 例患有未得到控制的癫痫的慢性患者队列中,药物反应性仅在 79 例(41%)中“未定义”。最常见的原因是 AED (35;44%)使用不当,其次是病历中缺乏关于治疗反应的信息(18;23%)和仅一种适当使用的 AED 失败(11;14%)。

结论

未得到控制的癫痫不一定与耐药性癫痫相同。应努力了解患者为何未无发作,以便适当调整 AED 方案,使患者能够长期无发作。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验