• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与原代人肝细胞相比,HepG2 和 HepaRG 中的基线和遗传毒性化合物诱导的基因表达谱。

Baseline and genotoxic compound induced gene expression profiles in HepG2 and HepaRG compared to primary human hepatocytes.

机构信息

Department of Toxicogenomics, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Toxicol In Vitro. 2013 Oct;27(7):2031-40. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2013.07.010. Epub 2013 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.tiv.2013.07.010
PMID:23911569
Abstract

Efforts are put into developing toxicogenomics-based toxicity testing methods using in vitro human cell models for improving human risk assessment/replacing animal models. Human in vitro liver models include HepG2, HepaRG and primary human hepatocytes (PHH). Studies on comparability/applicability of these cell types mainly focus on assessing baseline biotransformation capacities/cytochrome P450-inducibility, but compound-induced gene expression profiles are at least as important. Therefore, we compared baseline and aflatoxin B1- and benzo(α)pyrene-induced gene expression profiles in HepG2, HepaRG and PHH (11-13 donors). At baseline, all liver models differ from each other with respect to whole genome gene expression levels. PHH show profound inter-individual differences, and are most similar to HepaRG. After compound exposure, induced gene expression profiles are more similar between cell models, especially for benzo(α)pyrene. Pathways involved in compound metabolism are induced in all 3 models, while others are more pronounced in a specific cell model. Examples are transcriptomic modifications of carbohydrate-related genes (HepaRG) and of receptor-related genes (PHH) after benzo(α)pyrene exposure, and of cell cycle-related genes (HepG2) after aflatoxin B1 exposure. PHH gene expression responses are the most heterogeneous. In conclusion, at base line level PHH are more similar to HepaRG than to HepG2, but for toxicogenomics applications both cell lines perform equally well in comparison to PHH.

摘要

目前,人们正致力于开发基于毒理基因组学的体外人类细胞模型毒性检测方法,以改进人类风险评估/替代动物模型。体外人类肝脏模型包括 HepG2、HepaRG 和原代人肝细胞(PHH)。这些细胞类型的可比性/适用性研究主要集中在评估基线生物转化能力/细胞色素 P450 诱导能力上,但化合物诱导的基因表达谱至少同样重要。因此,我们比较了 HepG2、HepaRG 和 PHH(11-13 个供体)在基线水平以及黄曲霉毒素 B1 和苯并(α)芘诱导下的基因表达谱。在基线水平,所有的肝脏模型在全基因组基因表达水平上彼此不同。PHH 个体间差异很大,与 HepaRG 最相似。在化合物暴露后,细胞模型之间的诱导基因表达谱更为相似,尤其是苯并(α)芘。所有 3 种模型均诱导参与化合物代谢的途径,而其他途径在特定细胞模型中更为明显。例如,苯并(α)芘暴露后碳水化合物相关基因(HepaRG)和受体相关基因(PHH)的转录组修饰,以及黄曲霉毒素 B1 暴露后细胞周期相关基因(HepG2)的转录组修饰。PHH 的基因表达反应最具异质性。总之,在基线水平,PHH 与 HepaRG 比与 HepG2 更相似,但在毒理基因组学应用方面,与 PHH 相比,这两种细胞系的表现同样出色。

相似文献

1
Baseline and genotoxic compound induced gene expression profiles in HepG2 and HepaRG compared to primary human hepatocytes.与原代人肝细胞相比,HepG2 和 HepaRG 中的基线和遗传毒性化合物诱导的基因表达谱。
Toxicol In Vitro. 2013 Oct;27(7):2031-40. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2013.07.010. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
2
Comparison of HepG2 and HepaRG by whole-genome gene expression analysis for the purpose of chemical hazard identification.通过全基因组基因表达分析比较 HepG2 和 HepaRG 细胞,以识别化学危害。
Toxicol Sci. 2010 May;115(1):66-79. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfq026. Epub 2010 Jan 27.
3
Identification of early target genes of aflatoxin B1 in human hepatocytes, inter-individual variability and comparison with other genotoxic compounds.鉴定黄曲霉毒素 B1 在人肝细胞中的早期靶基因、个体间变异性,并与其他遗传毒性化合物进行比较。
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2012 Jan 15;258(2):176-87. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2011.10.019. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
4
Trovafloxacin-induced gene expression changes in liver-derived in vitro systems: comparison of primary human hepatocytes to HepG2 cells.曲伐沙星诱导的肝源体外系统中的基因表达变化:原代人肝细胞与HepG2细胞的比较。
Drug Metab Dispos. 2008 Feb;36(2):223-33. doi: 10.1124/dmd.107.017608. Epub 2007 Oct 29.
5
A comparison of whole genome gene expression profiles of HepaRG cells and HepG2 cells to primary human hepatocytes and human liver tissues.将 HepaRG 细胞和 HepG2 细胞与原代人肝细胞和人肝组织的全基因组基因表达谱进行比较。
Drug Metab Dispos. 2010 Jun;38(6):988-94. doi: 10.1124/dmd.109.031831. Epub 2010 Mar 12.
6
Effect of aflatoxin B, benzo[a]pyrene, and methapyrilene on transcriptomic and epigenetic alterations in human liver HepaRG cells.黄曲霉毒素 B、苯并[a]芘和甲吡嗪对人肝 HepaRG 细胞转录组和表观遗传改变的影响。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2018 Nov;121:214-223. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2018.08.034. Epub 2018 Aug 26.
7
Toxicogenomics-based prediction of acetaminophen-induced liver injury using human hepatic cell systems.利用人类肝细胞系统基于毒理基因组学预测对乙酰氨基酚诱导的肝损伤
Toxicol Lett. 2016 Jan 5;240(1):50-9. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2015.10.014. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
8
Comparison of primary human hepatocytes and hepatoma cell line Hepg2 with regard to their biotransformation properties.原代人肝细胞与肝癌细胞系Hepg2的生物转化特性比较。
Drug Metab Dispos. 2003 Aug;31(8):1035-42. doi: 10.1124/dmd.31.8.1035.
9
Comparison of Drug Metabolism and Its Related Hepatotoxic Effects in HepaRG, Cryopreserved Human Hepatocytes, and HepG2 Cell Cultures.HepaRG细胞、冷冻保存的人肝细胞和HepG2细胞培养物中药物代谢及其相关肝毒性作用的比较
Biol Pharm Bull. 2018 May 1;41(5):722-732. doi: 10.1248/bpb.b17-00913. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
10
Expression of cytochromes P450, conjugating enzymes and nuclear receptors in human hepatoma HepaRG cells.细胞色素P450、结合酶和核受体在人肝癌HepaRG细胞中的表达
Drug Metab Dispos. 2006 Jan;34(1):75-83. doi: 10.1124/dmd.105.006759. Epub 2005 Oct 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Mutation accumulation following extended exposure of human HepaRG cells to a genotoxic carcinogen.人类HepaRG细胞长期暴露于基因毒性致癌物后的突变积累。
J Environ Sci Health C Toxicol Carcinog. 2025 Aug 22:1-23. doi: 10.1080/26896583.2025.2548146.
2
Metabolic Biomarkers of Liver Failure in Cell Models and Patient Sera: Toward Liver Damage Evaluation In Vitro.细胞模型和患者血清中肝衰竭的代谢生物标志物:用于体外肝损伤评估
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Dec 23;25(24):13739. doi: 10.3390/ijms252413739.
3
Application of HepaRG cells for genotoxicity assessment: a review.
HepaRG 细胞在遗传毒性评估中的应用:综述。
J Environ Sci Health C Toxicol Carcinog. 2024;42(3):214-237. doi: 10.1080/26896583.2024.2331956. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
4
Model-based translation of DNA damage signaling dynamics across cell types.基于模型的跨细胞类型 DNA 损伤信号转导动态翻译。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Jul 8;18(7):e1010264. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010264. eCollection 2022 Jul.
5
Comparative Analysis of Transcriptional Responses to Genotoxic and Non-Genotoxic Agents in the Blood Cell Model TK6 and the Liver Model HepaRG.血液细胞模型 TK6 和肝模型 HepaRG 对遗传毒性和非遗传毒性剂的转录反应比较分析。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Mar 22;23(7):3420. doi: 10.3390/ijms23073420.
6
Comparative Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Cortex Extracts and Acetylsalicylic Acid in SARS-CoV-2 Peptide and LPS-Activated Human In Vitro Systems.皮质提取物和乙酰水杨酸在 SARS-CoV-2 肽和 LPS 激活的人体外系统中的抗炎作用比较。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Jun 23;22(13):6766. doi: 10.3390/ijms22136766.
7
An ensemble learning approach for modeling the systems biology of drug-induced injury.一种用于药物诱导损伤系统生物学建模的集成学习方法。
Biol Direct. 2021 Jan 12;16(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13062-020-00288-x.
8
450s nder striction (PURE) Screen Using HepaRG and Primary Human Hepatocytes for Discovery of Novel HBV Antivirals.使用HepaRG细胞和原代人肝细胞进行新型HBV抗病毒药物发现的450s限制(PURE)筛选
ACS Med Chem Lett. 2020 Feb 26;11(10):1919-1927. doi: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.9b00630. eCollection 2020 Oct 8.
9
Insights into Aflatoxin B1 Toxicity in Cattle: An In Vitro Whole-Transcriptomic Approach.黄曲霉毒素 B1 对牛毒性的研究进展:一种体外全转录组学方法。
Toxins (Basel). 2020 Jun 29;12(7):429. doi: 10.3390/toxins12070429.
10
Flow cytometric micronucleus assay and TGx-DDI transcriptomic biomarker analysis of ten genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals in human HepaRG™ cells.人源HepaRG™细胞中十种遗传毒性和非遗传毒性化学物质的流式细胞术微核试验及TGx-DDI转录组学生物标志物分析
Genes Environ. 2020 Feb 4;42:5. doi: 10.1186/s41021-019-0139-2. eCollection 2020.