• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随机对照临床试验:静脉腔内微波消融联合高位结扎术与传统手术治疗静脉曲张的对比。

Randomized clinical trial of endovenous microwave ablation combined with high ligation versus conventional surgery for varicose veins.

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, The First Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, PR China.

出版信息

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013 Oct;46(4):473-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.07.004. Epub 2013 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.07.004
PMID:23911734
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of endovenous microwave ablation (EMA) in treatment of varicose veins (VVS).

METHODS

The patients were randomly divided into EMA and high ligation and stripping (HLS) groups. Clinical outcomes and complications were assessed at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery, and the effect on quality of life was also assessed using the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) and Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) respectively.

RESULTS

EMA occluded VVS completely, with a shorter operative time, less bleeding and smaller incisions than the HLS procedure. In the EMA group, skin burns were found on 11 limbs (10.2%); sensory alteration and ecchymosis were less; and the recurrence rate of VVS was relatively lower compared with the HLS group. Both groups had significant improvement in VCSS and disease-specific quality of life (AVVQ) postoperatively. There was no significant difference in AVVQ and VCSS scores between the groups.

CONCLUSION

EMA is an effective new technique for the treatment of VVS, and had a more satisfactory clinical outcome than HLS in the short term.

摘要

目的

评估静脉内微波消融(EMA)治疗静脉曲张(VVS)的疗效。

方法

患者随机分为 EMA 和高位结扎剥脱术(HLS)组。术后 1、3、6、12 和 24 个月评估临床疗效和并发症,分别采用阿伯丁静脉曲张问卷(AVVQ)和静脉临床严重程度评分(VCSS)评估对生活质量的影响。

结果

EMA 完全闭塞 VVS,与 HLS 相比,手术时间更短,出血更少,切口更小。在 EMA 组,11 条肢体(10.2%)出现皮肤烧伤;感觉改变和瘀斑较少;VVS 的复发率也低于 HLS 组。两组术后 VCSS 和疾病特异性生活质量(AVVQ)均显著改善。两组间 AVVQ 和 VCSS 评分无显著差异。

结论

EMA 是治疗 VVS 的一种有效新技术,与 HLS 相比,在短期内具有更满意的临床效果。

相似文献

1
Randomized clinical trial of endovenous microwave ablation combined with high ligation versus conventional surgery for varicose veins.随机对照临床试验:静脉腔内微波消融联合高位结扎术与传统手术治疗静脉曲张的对比。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013 Oct;46(4):473-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.07.004. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
2
Comparison of one-year outcomes and quality of life between endovenous microwave ablation and high ligation and stripping of the great saphenous vein.静脉内微波消融与大隐静脉高位结扎剥脱术治疗大隐静脉曲张的 1 年疗效及生活质量比较。
Phlebology. 2024 Mar;39(2):108-113. doi: 10.1177/02683555231214338. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
3
Prospective randomized trial comparing endovenous laser ablation and surgery for treatment of primary great saphenous varicose veins with a 2-year follow-up.前瞻性随机临床试验比较静脉腔内激光消融术与手术治疗原发性大隐静脉曲张的疗效:2 年随访。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Nov;52(5):1234-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.06.104.
4
A retrospective study comparing endovenous laser ablation and microwave ablation for great saphenous varicose veins.回顾性研究比较静脉内激光消融和微波消融治疗大隐静脉曲张。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2012 Jul;16(7):873-7.
5
Same Site Recurrence is More Frequent After Endovenous Laser Ablation Compared with High Ligation and Stripping of the Great Saphenous Vein: 5 year Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial (RELACS Study).与大隐静脉高位结扎剥脱术相比,腔内激光消融术后同部位复发更为常见:一项随机临床试验(RELACS研究)的5年结果
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Nov;50(5):648-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.07.020. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
6
Comparison of 12-w versus 14-w endovenous laser ablation in the treatment of great saphenous varicose veins: 5-year outcomes from a randomized controlled trial.12周与14周腔内激光消融治疗大隐静脉曲张的比较:一项随机对照试验的5年结果
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2013 Jul;47(5):346-52. doi: 10.1177/1538574413487265. Epub 2013 May 3.
7
Randomized trial comparing endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein with high ligation and stripping in patients with varicose veins: short-term results.大隐静脉腔内激光消融术与高位结扎剥脱术治疗静脉曲张患者的随机对照试验:短期结果
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Aug;46(2):308-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.03.053. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
8
Randomised clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation with stripping of the great saphenous vein: clinical outcome and recurrence after 2 years.随机对照临床试验比较静脉内激光消融与大隐静脉剥脱术:2 年后的临床结果和复发情况。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010 May;39(5):630-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.11.040. Epub 2010 Jan 12.
9
Endovenous Microwave Ablation Versus Laser Ablation for Small Saphenous Vein Varicosis.腔内微波消融与激光消融治疗小隐静脉曲张的比较。
Adv Ther. 2024 Jun;41(6):2342-2351. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02854-5. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
10
A randomized clinical trial of endovenous laser ablation versus conventional surgery for small saphenous varicose veins.一项关于小隐静脉曲张的静脉腔内激光消融术与传统手术的随机临床试验。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Mar;61(3):741-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.09.037.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the effect of combination therapies in the treatment of large varicose ulcers: A real-world cohort study.比较联合治疗方案对大隐静脉曲张性溃疡治疗效果的影响:一项真实世界的队列研究。
Sci Prog. 2024 Jul-Sep;107(3):368504241283352. doi: 10.1177/00368504241283352.
2
Endovenous Microwave Ablation Versus Laser Ablation for Small Saphenous Vein Varicosis.腔内微波消融与激光消融治疗小隐静脉曲张的比较。
Adv Ther. 2024 Jun;41(6):2342-2351. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02854-5. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
3
[Varicosis-Current treatment concepts].[静脉曲张——当前的治疗理念]
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2024 May;95(5):415-426. doi: 10.1007/s00104-024-02063-4. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
4
A state-of-the-art review of quality-of-life assessment in venous disease.静脉疾病生活质量评估的最新研究综述。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Jul;12(4):101725. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.101725. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
5
Comparison of endovenous microwave ablation versus radiofrequency ablation for lower limb varicose veins.静脉腔内微波消融与射频消融治疗下肢静脉曲张的比较。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Jan;12(1):101662. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.03.022. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
6
Comparison of 5-year outcomes and quality of life between endovenous laser (980 nm) and microwave ablation combined with high ligation for varicose veins.980纳米静脉腔内激光与微波消融联合高位结扎治疗静脉曲张的5年疗效及生活质量比较
Front Surg. 2022 Oct 21;9:1022439. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1022439. eCollection 2022.
7
Efficacy and safety of endovenous microwave ablation versus laser ablation for great saphenous vein varicosis: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.腔内微波消融与激光消融治疗大隐静脉曲张的疗效和安全性比较:一项多中心、随机对照非劣效性试验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 25;12(5):e059213. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059213.
8
S2k guidelines: diagnosis and treatment of varicose veins.S2k指南:静脉曲张的诊断与治疗
Hautarzt. 2022 May;73(Suppl 1):1-44. doi: 10.1007/s00105-022-04977-8. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
9
Current Best Practice in the Management of Varicose Veins.静脉曲张管理的当前最佳实践
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2022 Apr 6;15:567-583. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S294990. eCollection 2022.
10
Current status of patient-reported outcome measures in vascular surgery.血管外科学中患者报告结局测量的现状。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Nov;74(5):1693-1706.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.05.038.