Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Jan;12(1):58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.07.021. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: In patients with appropriate indications, performance of both colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) at the same time (bundling) is convenient for patients, efficient for providers, and cost saving for the health care system. However, Medicare reimbursement for bundled procedures is at a rate that is less than the sum of the 2 procedures when charged separately, and this may create a disincentive to bundle. The practice patterns of bundling are unknown at a US population-based level.
We examined Medicare claims from 2007 to 2009 from the Carrier file in a national, random sample of fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 66 and older. We identified patients who had both a colonoscopy and EGD performed within 180 days of each other and calculated the proportions of patients with both procedures bundled on the same date, within 1 to 30 days, and within 31 to 180 days of each other. We compared patients in these 3 groups for demographics and clinical indications for the procedures (bleeding, lower or upper gastrointestinal symptoms, surveillance, and screening).
We identified 12,982 Medicare-enrolled individuals who had a colonoscopy and an EGD performed within 180 days of each other. Approximately 35% of procedures were not bundled on the same day, and, of these, 2359 (18%) were performed within 30 days of each other, and 2219 (17%) were performed within 31 to 180 days of each other. There were marked geographic differences in the percentage of bundling, with the lowest occurrence in the Northeast and the highest in the West. Patients with bundled procedures were more likely to have gastrointestinal bleeding and less likely to have screening or surveillance indications.
Although same-day bundling of endoscopic procedures offers a number of advantages, it is not practiced in more than one-third of cases in a national sample of Medicare beneficiaries.
对于具有适应证的患者,同时进行结肠镜检查和食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)既方便患者,又提高医疗服务提供者的工作效率,还能为医疗保健系统节省成本。然而,医疗保险对捆绑式手术的报销费用低于分别计费的两项手术费用之和,这可能会对捆绑式手术产生抑制作用。在美国人群中,捆绑式手术的实施模式尚不清楚。
我们从全国范围内按比例随机抽取的 Medicare 按服务收费受益人群中,从 Carrier 档案中查看了 2007 年至 2009 年的 Medicare 理赔数据。我们确定了在彼此 180 天内同时接受结肠镜检查和 EGD 的患者,并计算了在同一天、1 至 30 天内、31 至 180 天内捆绑这两种手术的患者比例。我们比较了这 3 组患者的人口统计学特征和手术适应证(出血、下或上消化道症状、监测和筛查)。
我们确定了 12982 名 Medicare 参保者,他们在彼此 180 天内同时接受了结肠镜检查和 EGD。大约 35%的手术未在同一天捆绑进行,其中 2359 例(18%)在彼此 30 天内进行,2219 例(17%)在 31 至 180 天内进行。捆绑比例存在明显的地域差异,东北部最低,西部最高。接受捆绑式手术的患者更有可能出现胃肠道出血,而进行筛查或监测的可能性较小。
尽管同一天进行内镜手术捆绑具有多项优势,但在 Medicare 参保者的全国样本中,超过三分之一的病例并未实施。