Suppr超能文献

英国血液与骨髓移植学会的一项研究:阿仑单抗与基于抗胸腺细胞球蛋白且不进行放疗的预处理方案用于获得性重型再生障碍性贫血非血缘及同胞全相合供者移植的回顾性研究

Retrospective study of alemtuzumab vs ATG-based conditioning without irradiation for unrelated and matched sibling donor transplants in acquired severe aplastic anemia: a study from the British Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

作者信息

Marsh J C, Pearce R M, Koh M B C, Lim Z, Pagliuca A, Mufti G J, Perry J, Snowden J A, Vora A J, Wynn R T, Russell N, Gibson B, Gilleece M, Milligan D, Veys P, Samarasinghe S, McMullin M, Kirkland K, Cook G

机构信息

Department of Haematological Medicine, King's College Hospital and King's College London,, London, UK.

BSBMT Data Registry, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014 Jan;49(1):42-8. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2013.115. Epub 2013 Aug 5.

Abstract

This retrospective national study compared the use of alemtuzumab-based conditioning regimens for hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) in acquired severe aplastic anemia with antithymocyte globulin (ATG)-based regimens. One hundred patients received alemtuzumab and 55 ATG-based regimens. A matched sibling donor (MSD) was used in 87 (56%), matched unrelated donor (MUD) in 60 (39%) and other related or mismatched unrelated donor (UD) in 8 (5%) patients. Engraftment failure occurred in 9% of the alemtuzumab group and 11% of the ATG group. Five-year OS was 90% for the alemtuzumab and 79% for the ATG groups, P=0.11. For UD HSCT, OS of patients was better when using alemtuzumab (88%) compared with ATG (57%), P=0.026, although smaller numbers of patients received ATG. Similar outcomes for MSD HSCT using alemtuzumab or ATG were seen (91% vs 85%, respectively, P=0.562). A lower risk of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was observed in the alemtuzumab group (11% vs 26%, P=0.031). On multivariate analysis, use of BM as stem cell source was associated with better OS and EFS, and less acute and cGVHD; young age was associated with better EFS and lower risk of graft failure. This large study confirms successful avoidance of irradiation in the conditioning regimens for MUD HSCT patients.

摘要

这项全国性回顾性研究比较了在获得性重型再生障碍性贫血中,基于阿仑单抗的造血干细胞移植(HSCT)预处理方案与基于抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(ATG)的方案的使用情况。100例患者接受了阿仑单抗治疗,55例接受了基于ATG的方案。87例(56%)患者使用了匹配的同胞供者(MSD),60例(39%)使用了匹配的无关供者(MUD),8例(5%)患者使用了其他相关或不匹配的无关供者(UD)。阿仑单抗组移植失败发生率为9%,ATG组为11%。阿仑单抗组的5年总生存率为90%,ATG组为79%,P = 0.11。对于UD HSCT,使用阿仑单抗的患者总生存率(88%)优于使用ATG的患者(57%),P = 0.026,尽管接受ATG治疗的患者数量较少。使用阿仑单抗或ATG的MSD HSCT患者的结果相似(分别为91%和85%,P = 0.562)。阿仑单抗组慢性移植物抗宿主病(cGVHD)风险较低(11%对26%,P = 0.031)。多因素分析显示,使用骨髓作为干细胞来源与更好的总生存率和无事件生存率相关,且急慢性GVHD发生率较低;年轻与更好的无事件生存率和较低的移植失败风险相关。这项大型研究证实,在MUD HSCT患者的预处理方案中成功避免了放疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验