Suppr超能文献

商业品牌与通用品牌避孕套健康说明的可读性

Readability of commercial versus generic health instructions for condoms.

作者信息

Ledbetter C, Hall S, Swanson J M, Forrest K

出版信息

Health Care Women Int. 1990;11(3):295-304. doi: 10.1080/07399339009515899.

Abstract

Despite the fact that condoms are increasingly recommended for the prevention of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) and other sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and have long been used as a barrier method of contraception, little is known about the readability of the range of materials that have been written exclusively for consumers on how to use a condom. The authors described and compared the reading comprehension levels of condom patient package inserts (PPIs) prepared commercially and those generic instructions (GIs) prepared by health care providers. Fifteen sets of PPIs and 30 sets of GIs were analyzed using six standard readability formulas (Fry, Fog, Dale-Chall, Flesch, Flesch-Kincaid, SMOG). Readability levels of the instructions ranged from grade 6.3 to 13.7. The PPIs required a significantly higher grade level for comprehension (mean 10.32) than the GIs (mean 8.69). This study suggests that instructions prepared by both sources may require a reading level above that of many consumers who need information on how to use a condom.

摘要

尽管避孕套越来越多地被推荐用于预防获得性免疫缺陷综合征(艾滋病)和其他性传播疾病,并且长期以来一直被用作一种屏障避孕方法,但对于专门为消费者撰写的关于如何使用避孕套的一系列材料的可读性却知之甚少。作者描述并比较了商业制备的避孕套患者包装说明书(PPI)和医疗保健提供者编写的通用说明书(GI)的阅读理解水平。使用六种标准可读性公式(弗莱、雾度、戴尔-查尔、弗莱什、弗莱什-金凯德、烟雾)分析了15套PPI和30套GI。说明书的可读性水平从6.3年级到13.7年级不等。与GI(平均8.69)相比,PPI理解所需的年级水平显著更高(平均10.32)。这项研究表明,这两个来源编写的说明书可能需要高于许多需要了解如何使用避孕套信息的消费者的阅读水平。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验