Department of Colorectal Surgery, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK,
Tech Coloproctol. 2014 Mar;18(3):273-6. doi: 10.1007/s10151-013-1053-4. Epub 2013 Aug 3.
The objective of this study was to measure the change in colonic transit time after resection rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse.
We prospectively carried out isotope colonic transit studies before resection rectopexy in 38 patients with full-thickness complete rectal prolapse and invited them to attend for a postoperative transit study at least 1 year after resection rectopexy.
Preoperatively, 27 (70 %) patients had abnormally prolonged colonic transit times, while 11 had normal colonic transit. Twenty-two (61 %) patients agreed to attend for a three-day colonic transit study. Resection rectopexy failed to correct delayed colonic transit in all patients with abnormal preoperative tests, while 4 patients developed new delayed transit and 2 with normal transit were unchanged.
The study suggests that most prolapse patients have a pan-colonic motility disorder that is not corrected by rectopexy and resection of most of the left colon. If resection rectopexy fails to correct abnormal transit, this study questions the rationale for continuing to offer resection and supports less invasive surgical procedures such as ventral rectopexy.
本研究的目的是测量直肠全层脱垂行直肠固定术后结肠传输时间的变化。
我们前瞻性地对 38 例全层直肠脱垂患者行直肠固定术前进行放射性核素结肠传输研究,并邀请他们在直肠固定术后至少 1 年进行术后传输研究。
术前,27 例(70%)患者结肠传输时间延长,11 例患者结肠传输正常。22 例(61%)患者同意进行为期 3 天的结肠传输研究。直肠固定术未能纠正所有术前检查异常患者的结肠传输延迟,而 4 例患者出现新的延迟传输,2 例正常传输患者无变化。
该研究表明,大多数脱垂患者存在全结肠运动障碍,直肠固定术和大部分左半结肠切除术无法纠正这种障碍。如果直肠固定术不能纠正异常传输,本研究对继续进行切除的合理性提出质疑,并支持采用经腹直肠固定术等侵袭性较小的手术。