Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3508 GA, the Netherlands.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Feb;15(2):119-29. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jet127. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
For acquired mechanical prosthetic heart valve (PHV) obstruction and suspicion on thrombosis, recently updated European Society of Cardiology guidelines advocate the confirmation of thrombus by transthoracic echocardiography, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and fluoroscopy. However, no evidence-based diagnostic algorithm is available for correct thrombus detection, although this is clinically important as fibrinolysis is contraindicated in non-thrombotic obstruction (isolated pannus). Here, we performed a review of the literature in order to propose a diagnostic algorithm.
We performed a systematic search in Pubmed and Embase. Included publications were assessed on methodological quality based on the validated Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) II checklist. Studies were scarce (n = 15) and the majority were of moderate methodological quality. In total, 238 mechanical PHV's with acquired obstruction and a reliable reference standard were included for the evaluation of the role of fluoroscopy, echocardiography, or multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT). In acquired PHV obstruction caused by thrombosis, mass detection by TEE and leaflet restriction detected by fluoroscopy were observed in the majority of cases (96 and 100%, respectively). In contrast, in acquired PHV obstruction free of thrombosis (pannus), leaflet restriction detected by fluoroscopy was absent in some cases (17%) and mass detection by TEE was absent in the majority of cases (66%). In case of mass detection by TEE, predictors for obstructive thrombus masses (compared with pannus masses) were leaflet restriction, soft echo density, and increased mass length. In situations of inconclusive echocardiography, MDCT may correctly detect pannus/thrombus based on the morphological aspects and localization.
In acquired mechanical PHV obstruction without leaflet restriction and absent mass on TEE, obstructive PHV thrombosis cannot be confirmed and consequently, fibrinolysis is not advised. Based on the literature search and our opinion, a diagnostic algorithm is provided to correctly identify non-thrombotic PHV obstruction, which is highly relevant in daily clinical practice.
对于获得性机械人工心脏瓣膜(PHV)阻塞和疑似血栓形成,最近更新的欧洲心脏病学会指南主张通过经胸超声心动图、经食管超声心动图(TEE)和透视来确认血栓。然而,目前尚无基于证据的诊断算法可用于正确检测血栓,尽管这在临床上很重要,因为在非血栓性阻塞(孤立性瓣叶赘生物)中禁忌使用纤溶。在这里,我们对文献进行了回顾,以提出一种诊断算法。
我们在 Pubmed 和 Embase 中进行了系统搜索。根据经过验证的诊断准确性研究质量评估(QUADAS)II 清单对纳入的出版物进行了方法学质量评估。研究数量较少(n=15),且大多数研究的方法学质量为中等。总共纳入了 238 例因获得性阻塞而接受机械 PHV 并具有可靠参考标准的患者,以评估透视、超声心动图或多排螺旋 CT(MDCT)的作用。在由血栓引起的获得性 PHV 阻塞中,TEE 检测到的肿块和透视检测到的瓣叶限制在大多数情况下可见(分别为 96%和 100%)。相比之下,在无血栓形成(瓣叶赘生物)的获得性 PHV 阻塞中,透视检测到的瓣叶限制在某些情况下不存在(17%),TEE 检测到的肿块在大多数情况下不存在(66%)。在 TEE 检测到肿块的情况下,阻塞性血栓肿块(与瓣叶赘生物肿块相比)的预测因子是瓣叶限制、软回声密度和肿块长度增加。在超声心动图结果不确定的情况下,MDCT 可以根据形态学特征和定位正确检测瓣叶赘生物/血栓。
在无瓣叶限制且 TEE 上未见肿块的获得性机械 PHV 阻塞中,不能确认阻塞性 PHV 血栓形成,因此不建议进行纤溶。根据文献检索和我们的意见,提供了一种诊断算法来正确识别非血栓性 PHV 阻塞,这在日常临床实践中具有重要意义。