Lin Tin-Chi, Adserà Alícia
71 Frankland Road, Hopkinton, MA 01748, USA.
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2013 Aug 1;32(4):553-584. doi: 10.1007/s11113-013-9269-6.
We use a nationally representative survey of Indian households (NFHS-3) to conduct the first study that analyzes whether son preference is associated with girls bearing a larger burden of housework than boys. Housework is a non-negligible part of child labor in which around 60 % of children in our sample are engaged. The preference for male offspring is measured by a mother's ideal proportion of sons among her offspring. We show that when the ideal proportion increases from 0 to 1, the gap in the time spent on weekly housework for an average girl compared to that of a boy increases by 2.5 h. We conduct several robustness analyses. First, we estimate the main model separately by caste, religion, and family size. Second, we use a two-stage model to look at participation into housework (as well as other types of work) in addition to hours. Third, we use mother's fertility intentions as an alternative measure of son preference. The analysis confirms that stated differences in male preference translate in de facto differences in girl's treatment.
我们利用一项对印度家庭具有全国代表性的调查(第三次全国家庭健康调查)开展了第一项研究,该研究分析了重男轻女是否与女孩比男孩承担更重的家务负担有关。家务劳动是童工劳动中不可忽视的一部分,在我们的样本中,约60%的儿童从事家务劳动。对男性后代的偏好通过母亲理想的儿子在其子女中的比例来衡量。我们发现,当理想比例从0增加到1时,平均而言,女孩每周做家务的时间与男孩相比增加了2.5小时。我们进行了多项稳健性分析。首先,我们按种姓、宗教和家庭规模分别估计主要模型。其次,我们使用两阶段模型来考察除了做家务时间之外的家务参与情况(以及其他类型的工作)。第三,我们将母亲的生育意愿作为重男轻女的替代衡量指标。分析证实,所表明的对男性的偏好差异转化为了对女孩实际待遇的差异。