Department of Oncology, Guangzhou General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Cancer Invest. 2013 Aug;31(7):454-60. doi: 10.3109/07357907.2013.820315.
Except for EGFR gene mutation, there is still lack of predictive factors for gefitinib activity as the second-line treatments for advanced NSCLC with wild-type (WT) EGFR or patients with mutant EGFR but showed poor response. Our purpose was to assess the predictive value of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and IGF-1R for gefitinib efficacy as the second-line treatment for NSCLC.
53 advanced NSCLC patients who accepted gefitinib as the second-line treatment were enrolled in this study. Expression of E-cadherin, vimentin, and IGF-1R was determined by immunohistochemistry. EGFR gene mutation was determined by liquidchip technique.
The positive rate of EMT, IGF-1R, and EGFR gene mutation was 54.7%, 58.5%, and 39.6%, respectively. EMT (-) was positively correlated with EGFR gene mutation (p = .034) and EMT (+) was associated with IGF-1R (+) (p = .000). EMT (-) was associated with a significantly higher objective response rate (ORR) for all the 53 patients (41.7% vs. 6.9%, p = .024) and showed a higher ORR tendency than EMT (+) in EGFR mutation patients (50.0% vs. 28.6%) and WT EGFR patients (20.0% vs. 4.5%) (p > .05). EMT (-) showed a significant longer median survival time (MST) than EMT (+) for all 53 patients (8 months vs. 4 months) and WT EGFR patients (6 months vs. 3 months) (p < .05). IGF-1R (-) showed a higher ORR tendency than IGF-1R (+) in EGFR mutation patients (54% vs. 30%) and WT EGFR patients (18.2% vs. 4.8%) (p > .05).
EMT is correlated with efficacy of gefitinib as the second-line treatment for NSCLC, and combined detection of EMT and IGF-1R may be used as new predictors besides EGFR mutation, especially for patients with WT EGFR.
除了 EGFR 基因突变外,对于晚期 NSCLC 野生型(WT)EGFR 或 EGFR 突变但反应不佳的患者,二线治疗中吉非替尼的疗效仍缺乏预测因素。我们的目的是评估上皮-间充质转化(EMT)和 IGF-1R 对吉非替尼作为 NSCLC 二线治疗的疗效的预测价值。
本研究纳入了 53 例接受吉非替尼二线治疗的晚期 NSCLC 患者。通过免疫组织化学检测 E-钙黏蛋白、波形蛋白和 IGF-1R 的表达。通过液体芯片技术检测 EGFR 基因突变。
EMT、IGF-1R 和 EGFR 基因突变的阳性率分别为 54.7%、58.5%和 39.6%。EMT(-)与 EGFR 基因突变呈正相关(p =.034),而 EMT(+)与 IGF-1R(+)相关(p =.000)。EMT(-)与所有 53 例患者的客观缓解率(ORR)显著相关(41.7%比 6.9%,p =.024),并且在 EGFR 突变患者(50.0%比 28.6%)和 WT EGFR 患者(20.0%比 4.5%)中比 EMT(+)有更高的 ORR 趋势(p >.05)。EMT(-)与所有 53 例患者(8 个月比 4 个月)和 WT EGFR 患者(6 个月比 3 个月)的中位生存期(MST)显著相关(p <.05)。IGF-1R(-)在 EGFR 突变患者(54%比 30%)和 WT EGFR 患者(18.2%比 4.8%)中比 IGF-1R(+)有更高的 ORR 趋势(p >.05)。
EMT 与吉非替尼作为 NSCLC 二线治疗的疗效相关,联合检测 EMT 和 IGF-1R 可能是 EGFR 突变以外的新预测因素,特别是对于 WT EGFR 患者。