• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估宫颈癌筛查邀请函的效果。

Evaluating the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening invitation letters.

机构信息

Screening Programs, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg Manitoba, Canada.

出版信息

J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2013 Aug;22(8):687-93. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2012.4203.

DOI:10.1089/jwh.2012.4203
PMID:23915107
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an invitation letter on cervical screening participation among unscreened women 30 to 69 years of age.

METHODS

A cluster randomized trial design was used in which unscreened women (n=31,452) were randomized by the forward sortation area (FSA) of their postal code to an intervention group that was sent an invitation letter (n=17,068) or a group that was not sent an invitation letter (n=14,384).

RESULTS

Six months after the letters were mailed, 1,010 women in the intervention group (5.92%) and 441 women in the control group (3.06%) had a Pap test. After adjusting for variables that have previously shown to influence screening participation, women who were sent an invitation letter were significantly more likely to have had a Pap test in the next 6 months compared with women who were not sent an invitation letter (odds ratio [OR]=2.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.09-3.35, p<0.001). Overall, the effectiveness of the invitation letter improved with increasing age (p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Sending invitation letters increased cervical screening participation but because the overall effect was small, additional strategies that remove barriers to screening for unscreened women are also necessary.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估针对 30 至 69 岁未接受筛查的女性,通过邀请信提高子宫颈筛查参与度的效果。

方法

采用整群随机试验设计,将未接受筛查的女性(n=31452)按邮政编码的前向排序区(FSA)随机分为干预组(n=17068)和对照组(n=14384)。干预组收到邀请信,对照组未收到邀请信。

结果

在信件寄出后的 6 个月,干预组有 1010 名女性(5.92%)和对照组有 441 名女性(3.06%)接受了巴氏涂片检查。在调整了先前显示会影响筛查参与的变量后,与未收到邀请信的女性相比,收到邀请信的女性在接下来的 6 个月内接受巴氏涂片检查的可能性显著更高(比值比 [OR]=2.60,95%置信区间 [CI] 2.09-3.35,p<0.001)。总体而言,邀请信的效果随着年龄的增加而提高(p=0.02)。

结论

发送邀请信可提高子宫颈筛查参与度,但由于总体效果较小,还需要采取其他策略来消除未接受筛查女性的筛查障碍。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening invitation letters.评估宫颈癌筛查邀请函的效果。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2013 Aug;22(8):687-93. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2012.4203.
2
Impact of invitation and reminder letters on cervical cancer screening participation rates in an organized screening program.邀请函和提醒信对有组织筛查项目中宫颈癌筛查参与率的影响。
Prev Med. 2016 Jul;88:230-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.04.019. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
3
A quasi-randomized trial on the effectiveness of an invitation letter to improve participation in a setting of opportunistic screening for cervical cancer.一项关于邀请信在提高宫颈癌机会性筛查参与率方面有效性的半随机试验。
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2008 Jun;17(3):238-42. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e3282b6fe2e.
4
Effectiveness of a call/recall system in improving compliance with cervical cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.电话/召回系统在提高宫颈癌筛查依从性方面的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
CMAJ. 1997 Sep 1;157(5):521-6.
5
A primary healthcare-based intervention to improve a Danish cervical cancer screening programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial.基于初级保健的干预措施改善丹麦宫颈癌筛查计划:一项集群随机对照试验。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009 Jul;63(7):510-5. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.077636. Epub 2009 Feb 18.
6
Improving uptake of cervical cancer screening in women with prolonged history of non-attendance for screening: a randomized trial of enhanced invitation methods.提高长期未参加宫颈癌筛查女性的筛查接受率:强化邀请方法的随机试验
J Med Screen. 2005;12(4):185-9. doi: 10.1258/096914105775220741.
7
Invitation to cervical cancer screening does increase participation in Germany: Results from the MARZY study.在德国,宫颈癌筛查邀请确实会提高参与率:MARZY研究结果
Int J Cancer. 2016 Sep 1;139(5):1018-30. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30146. Epub 2016 May 13.
8
The Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Cervical Cancer Screening Using a Systematic Invitation System in Lithuania.立陶宛使用系统邀请制进行宫颈癌筛查的成本效益分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 11;16(24):5035. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16245035.
9
Assessing the impact of mailing self-sampling kits for human papillomavirus testing to unscreened non-responder women in Manitoba.评估向曼尼托巴省未筛查的未应答女性邮寄人乳头瘤病毒自我采样试剂盒对其产生的影响。
Curr Oncol. 2019 Jun;26(3):167-172. doi: 10.3747/co.26.4575. Epub 2019 Jun 1.
10
Cervical cancer screening in medically underserved California Latina and non-Latina women: effect of age and regularity of Pap testing.加利福尼亚州医疗服务不足地区拉丁裔和非拉丁裔女性的宫颈癌筛查:年龄和巴氏试验规律性的影响
Cancer Detect Prev. 2009;32(5-6):372-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cdp.2009.02.001. Epub 2009 Mar 4.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of a health education program on cervical cancer screening uptake: A survey among primary school teachers in Phnom Penh, Cambodia.一项健康教育项目对宫颈癌筛查接受率的影响:柬埔寨金边小学教师的一项调查。
GHM Open. 2025 Jun 30;5(1):21-29. doi: 10.35772/ghmo.2024.01017.
2
Health care system and patient-related factors affecting low cancer screening participation in Poland.影响波兰癌症筛查参与率低的医疗保健系统及患者相关因素。
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Sep 26;36:102442. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102442. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
The impact of age-relevant and generic infographics on knowledge, attitudes and intention to attend cervical screening: A randomized controlled trial.
年龄相关和通用信息图对知识、态度和参加宫颈癌筛查意愿的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Br J Health Psychol. 2024 Feb;29(1):204-220. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12695. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
4
Barriers and recommendations for a cervical cancer screening program among women in low-resource settings in Lagos Nigeria: a qualitative study.尼日利亚拉各斯资源匮乏地区女性宫颈癌筛查项目的障碍和建议:一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Oct 12;22(1):1906. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14314-2.
5
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.
6
Assessing the impact of mailing self-sampling kits for human papillomavirus testing to unscreened non-responder women in Manitoba.评估向曼尼托巴省未筛查的未应答女性邮寄人乳头瘤病毒自我采样试剂盒对其产生的影响。
Curr Oncol. 2019 Jun;26(3):167-172. doi: 10.3747/co.26.4575. Epub 2019 Jun 1.
7
Patient Knowledge of and Barriers to Breast, Colon, and Cervical Cancer Screenings: A Cross-Sectional Survey of TRICARE Beneficiaries.患者对乳腺癌、结肠癌和宫颈癌筛查的了解及障碍:对TRICARE受益人的横断面调查
Fed Pract. 2017 May;34(Suppl 3):S50-S56.
8
Impact of Patient Reminders on Papanicolaou Test Completion for High-Risk Patients Identified by a Clinical Decision Support System.临床决策支持系统识别的高危患者的患者提醒对巴氏试验完成情况的影响。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 May;27(5):569-574. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6667. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
9
Effect of cervical cancer education and provider recommendation for screening on screening rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis.宫颈癌教育及医疗服务提供者的筛查建议对筛查率的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 5;12(9):e0183924. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183924. eCollection 2017.
10
Experiences in recruiting volunteers through community based initiatives in phase-1 vaccine trials in India.印度1期疫苗试验中通过社区倡议招募志愿者的经验。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2014;10(2):485-91. doi: 10.4161/hv.26799. Epub 2013 Oct 18.