Institute for Plant Genomics and Biotechnology, Center for Cell Death and Differentiation, Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA.
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2013;51:543-70. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-081211-173027.
Programmed cell death (PCD) is essential for proper growth, development, and cellular homeostasis in all eukaryotes. The regulation of PCD is of central importance in plant-microbe interactions; notably, PCD and features associated with PCD are observed in many host resistance responses. Conversely, pathogen induction of inappropriate cell death in the host results in a susceptible phenotype and disease. Thus, the party in control of PCD has a distinct advantage in these battles. PCD processes appear to be of ancient origin, as indicated by the fact that many features of cell death strategy are conserved between animals and plants; however, some of the details of death execution differ. Mammalian core PCD genes, such as caspases, are not present in plant genomes. Similarly, pro- and antiapoptotic mammalian regulatory elements are absent in plants, but, remarkably, when expressed in plants, successfully impact plant PCD. Thus, subtle structural similarities independent of sequence homology appear to sustain operational equivalence. The vacuole is emerging as a key organelle in the modulation of plant PCD. Under different signals for cell death, the vacuole either fuses with the plasmalemma membrane or disintegrates. Moreover, the vacuole appears to play a key role in autophagy; evidence suggests a prosurvival function for autophagy, but other studies propose a prodeath phenotype. Here, we describe and discuss what we know and what we do not know about various PCD pathways and how the host integrates signals to activate salicylic acid and reactive oxygen pathways that orchestrate cell death. We suggest that it is not cell death as such but rather the processes leading to cell death that contribute to the outcome of a given plant-pathogen interaction.
程序性细胞死亡(PCD)对于所有真核生物的正常生长、发育和细胞内稳态至关重要。PCD 的调节在植物-微生物相互作用中至关重要;值得注意的是,在许多宿主抗性反应中观察到 PCD 和与 PCD 相关的特征。相反,病原体诱导宿主中不适当的细胞死亡会导致易感性表型和疾病。因此,在这些战斗中,控制 PCD 的一方具有明显的优势。PCD 过程似乎具有古老的起源,这表明细胞死亡策略的许多特征在动物和植物之间是保守的;然而,死亡执行的一些细节有所不同。哺乳动物核心 PCD 基因,如半胱天冬酶,不存在于植物基因组中。同样,促进和抗凋亡的哺乳动物调节元件在植物中不存在,但值得注意的是,当在植物中表达时,它们会成功影响植物 PCD。因此,独立于序列同源性的微妙结构相似性似乎维持了操作等效性。液泡作为调节植物 PCD 的关键细胞器正在出现。在不同的细胞死亡信号下,液泡要么与质膜融合,要么解体。此外,液泡似乎在自噬中发挥关键作用;有证据表明自噬具有促生存功能,但其他研究提出了促死亡表型。在这里,我们描述和讨论了我们对各种 PCD 途径的了解和不了解的地方,以及宿主如何整合信号来激活水杨酸和活性氧途径来协调细胞死亡。我们认为,导致细胞死亡的过程而不是细胞死亡本身,导致了特定植物-病原体相互作用的结果。