Wendlandt Camille E, Basu Saumik, Montoya Angeliqua P, Roberts Paige, Stewart Justin D, Coffin Allison B, Crowder David W, Kiers E Toby, Porter Stephanie S
School of Biological Sciences Washington State University Vancouver Washington USA.
Department of Entomology Washington State University Pullman Washington USA.
Evol Appl. 2024 Dec 29;18(1):e70064. doi: 10.1111/eva.70064. eCollection 2025 Jan.
Successful plant growth requires plants to minimize harm from antagonists and maximize benefit from mutualists. However, these outcomes may be difficult to achieve simultaneously, since plant defenses activated in response to antagonists can compromise mutualism function, and plant resources allocated to defense may trade off with resources allocated to managing mutualists. Here, we investigate how antagonist attack affects plant ability to manage mutualists with sanctions, in which a plant rewards cooperative mutualists and/or punishes uncooperative mutualists. We studied interactions among wild and domesticated pea plants, pea aphids, an aphid-vectored virus (Pea Enation Mosaic Virus, PEMV), and mutualistic rhizobial bacteria that fix nitrogen in root nodules. Using isogenic rhizobial strains that differ in their ability to fix nitrogen and express contrasting fluorescent proteins, we found that peas demonstrated sanctions in both singly-infected nodules and mixed-infection nodules containing both strains. However, the plant's ability to manage mutualists in mixed-infection nodules traded off with its ability to defend against antagonists: when plants were attacked by aphids, they stopped sanctioning within mixed-infection nodules, and plants that exerted stricter sanctions within nodules during aphid attack accumulated higher levels of the aphid-vectored virus, PEMV. Our findings suggest that plants engaged in defense against antagonists suffer a reduced ability to select for the most beneficial symbionts in mixed-infection tissues. Mixed-infection tissues may be relatively common in this mutualism, and reduced plant sanctions in these tissues could provide a refuge for uncooperative mutualists and compromise the benefit that plants obtain from mutualistic symbionts during antagonist attack. Understanding the conflicting selective pressures plants face in complex biotic environments will be crucial for breeding crop varieties that can maximize benefits from mutualists even when they encounter antagonists.
植物的成功生长需要它们将来自拮抗者的伤害降至最低,并将与共生者共生所获得的益处最大化。然而,这些结果可能难以同时实现,因为植物对拮抗者做出反应时激活的防御机制可能会损害共生功能,而且分配给防御的植物资源可能会与分配给管理共生者的资源相互权衡。在这里,我们研究了拮抗者的攻击如何影响植物通过制裁来管理共生者的能力,即植物奖励合作的共生者和/或惩罚不合作的共生者。我们研究了野生和驯化豌豆植株、豌豆蚜、一种由蚜虫传播的病毒(豌豆耳突花叶病毒,PEMV)以及在根瘤中固氮的共生根瘤菌之间的相互作用。使用在固氮能力和表达对比荧光蛋白能力上存在差异的同基因根瘤菌菌株,我们发现豌豆在单一感染的根瘤和含有两种菌株的混合感染根瘤中都表现出制裁行为。然而,植物在混合感染根瘤中管理共生者的能力与其抵御拮抗者的能力相互权衡:当植物受到蚜虫攻击时,它们在混合感染根瘤中停止了制裁,并且在蚜虫攻击期间在根瘤内实施更严格制裁的植物积累了更高水平的由蚜虫传播的病毒PEMV。我们的研究结果表明,参与抵御拮抗者的植物在混合感染组织中选择最有益共生体的能力会降低。混合感染组织在这种共生关系中可能相对常见,并且这些组织中植物制裁的减少可能会为不合作的共生者提供一个庇护所,并在拮抗者攻击期间损害植物从共生共生体中获得的益处。了解植物在复杂生物环境中面临的相互冲突的选择压力对于培育即使在遇到拮抗者时也能从共生者中获得最大益处的作物品种至关重要。