• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公共卫生传播与警报疲劳。

Public health communications and alert fatigue.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Aug 5;13:295. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-295.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-13-295
PMID:23915324
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3751004/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health care providers play a significant role in large scale health emergency planning, detection, response, recovery and communication with the public. The effectiveness of health care providers in emergency preparedness and response roles depends, in part, on public health agencies communicating information in a way that maximizes the likelihood that the message is delivered, received, deemed credible and, when appropriate, acted on. However, during an emergency, health care providers can become inundated with alerts and advisories through numerous national, state, local and professional communication channels. We conducted an alert fatigue study as a sub-study of a larger randomized controlled trial which aimed to identify the most effective methods of communicating public health messages between public health agencies and providers. We report an analysis of the effects of public health message volume/frequency on recall of specific message content and effect of rate of message communications on health care provider alert fatigue.

METHODS

Health care providers enrolled in the larger study (n=528) were randomized to receive public health messages via email, fax, short message service (SMS or cell phone text messaging) or to a control group that did not receive messages. For 12 months, study messages based on real events of public health significance were sent quarterly with follow-up telephone interviews regarding message receipt and topic recall conducted 5-10 days after the message delivery date. During a pandemic when numerous messages are sent, alert fatigue may impact ability to recall whether a specific message has been received due to the "noise" created by the higher number of messages. To determine the impact of "noise" when study messages were sent, we compared health care provider recall of the study message topic to the number of local public health messages sent to health care providers.

RESULTS

We calculated the mean number of messages that each provider received from local public health during the time period around each study message and provider recall of study message content. We found that recall rates were inversely proportional to the mean number of messages received per week: Every increase of one local public health message per week resulted in a statistically significant 41.2% decrease (p < 0.01), 95% CI [0.39, .87] in the odds of recalling the content of the study message.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first study to document the effects of alert fatigue on health care providers' recall of information. Our results suggest that information delivered too frequently and/or repetitively through numerous communication channels may have a negative effect on the ability of health care providers to effectively recall emergency information. Keeping health care providers and other first-line responders informed during an emergency is critical. Better coordination between organizations disseminating alerts, advisories and other messages may improve the ability of health care providers to recall public health emergency messages, potentially impacting effective response to public health emergency messages.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c58e/3751004/d3cb79991a4a/1472-6963-13-295-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c58e/3751004/8c59c0d6d5fb/1472-6963-13-295-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c58e/3751004/f07f58ac16f6/1472-6963-13-295-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c58e/3751004/d3cb79991a4a/1472-6963-13-295-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c58e/3751004/8c59c0d6d5fb/1472-6963-13-295-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c58e/3751004/f07f58ac16f6/1472-6963-13-295-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c58e/3751004/d3cb79991a4a/1472-6963-13-295-3.jpg
摘要

背景

医疗保健提供者在大规模卫生应急规划、检测、应对、恢复和与公众沟通方面发挥着重要作用。医疗保健提供者在应急准备和应对角色中的有效性部分取决于公共卫生机构以最大限度地提高信息传递、接收、被认为可信的可能性,并在适当情况下采取行动的方式来传达信息。然而,在紧急情况下,医疗保健提供者可能会通过众多国家、州、地方和专业沟通渠道收到大量警报和咨询。我们进行了一项警报疲劳研究,作为一项旨在确定在公共卫生机构和提供者之间传达公共卫生信息的最有效方法的更大规模随机对照试验的子研究。我们报告了公共卫生信息数量/频率对特定信息内容的回忆效果以及信息通信率对医疗保健提供者警报疲劳的影响的分析。

方法

参加较大研究的医疗保健提供者(n=528)被随机分配通过电子邮件、传真、短信服务(SMS 或手机短信)或不接收消息的对照组接收公共卫生消息。在 12 个月的时间里,基于具有公共卫生重要意义的真实事件的研究消息每季度发送一次,并在消息发送日期后的 5-10 天进行有关消息接收和主题回忆的后续电话访谈。在大流行期间,由于发送了大量消息,警报疲劳可能会影响对特定消息是否已收到的回忆能力,因为“噪音”会导致消息数量增加。为了确定在发送研究消息时“噪音”的影响,我们将医疗保健提供者对研究消息主题的回忆与发送给医疗保健提供者的当地公共卫生消息数量进行了比较。

结果

我们计算了每个提供者在研究消息前后的时间段内从当地公共卫生部门收到的消息的平均数量以及提供者对研究消息内容的回忆。我们发现,回忆率与每周收到的消息数量成反比:每周多收到一条当地公共卫生消息,就会导致研究消息内容的回忆几率统计学显著降低 41.2%(p<0.01),95%CI[0.39,0.87]。

结论

据我们所知,这是第一项记录警报疲劳对医疗保健提供者信息回忆影响的研究。我们的结果表明,通过多个沟通渠道过于频繁和/或重复地传递信息可能会对医疗保健提供者有效回忆紧急信息的能力产生负面影响。在紧急情况下让医疗保健提供者和其他一线响应人员了解情况至关重要。更好地协调发布警报、咨询和其他消息的组织可能会提高医疗保健提供者回忆公共卫生应急消息的能力,从而可能影响对公共卫生应急消息的有效响应。

相似文献

1
Public health communications and alert fatigue.公共卫生传播与警报疲劳。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Aug 5;13:295. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-295.
2
Exploring bi-directional and SMS messaging for communications between Public Health Agencies and their stakeholders: a qualitative study.探索公共卫生机构与其利益相关者之间通信的双向和短信消息传递:一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jul 8;15:621. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1980-2.
3
A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effectiveness of Traditional and Mobile Public Health Communications With Health Care Providers.一项关于传统与移动公共卫生沟通方式对医疗服务提供者有效性的随机对照试验。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2016 Feb;10(1):98-107. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2015.139. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
4
How 2 txt: an exploration of crafting public health messages in SMS.如何编写文本:关于通过短信制作公共卫生信息的探索
BMC Res Notes. 2014 Aug 11;7:514. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-514.
5
Health-care provider preferences for time-sensitive communications from public health agencies.卫生保健提供者对公共卫生机构的时间敏感型通信的偏好。
Public Health Rep. 2014;129 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):67-76. doi: 10.1177/00333549141296S410.
6
Development of a staff recall system for mass casualty incidents using cell phone text messaging.利用手机短信开发大规模伤亡事件人员召回系统。
Anesth Analg. 2010 Mar 1;110(3):871-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181cb3f9e.
7
Effects of COVID-19 Emergency Alert Text Messages on Practicing Preventive Behaviors: Cross-sectional Web-Based Survey in South Korea.新冠疫情紧急警报短信对践行预防行为的影响:韩国基于网络的横断面调查
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 25;23(2):e24165. doi: 10.2196/24165.
8
A Randomized Trial Comparing Telephone Tree, Text Messaging, and Instant Messaging App for Emergency Department Staff Recall for Disaster Response.一项比较电话树、短信和即时通讯应用程序用于急诊科工作人员灾难应对召回的随机试验。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018 Oct;33(5):471-477. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X18000912.
9
Public health emergency preparedness and response communications with health care providers: a literature review.公共卫生应急准备和响应通信与医疗保健提供者:文献综述。
BMC Public Health. 2011 May 18;11:337. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-337.
10
Factors Associated With Opting Out of Automated Text and Telephone Messages Among Adult Members of an Integrated Health Care System.与综合医疗保健系统中成年成员选择退出自动文本和电话信息相关的因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e213479. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.3479.

引用本文的文献

1
Longitudinal changes in hand hygiene adherence among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic, Dominican Republic.新冠疫情期间多米尼加共和国医护人员手部卫生依从性的纵向变化
PLOS Water. 2024 May 10;3(5). doi: 10.1371/journal.pwat.0000231.
2
Assessment of the impact of power business intelligence on adenoma detection rate: a prospective observational trial.评估电力商业智能对腺瘤检出率的影响:一项前瞻性观察性试验。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr 19;25(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03894-z.
3
Mobile Health Tool to Capture Social Determinants of Health and Their Impact on HIV Treatment Outcomes Among People Who Use Drugs: Pilot Feasibility Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Lessons learned during dengue outbreaks in the United States, 2001-2011.2001-2011 年美国登革热疫情暴发的经验教训。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2012 Apr;18(4):608-14. doi: 10.3201/eid1804.110968.
2
Information chaos in primary care: implications for physician performance and patient safety.初级保健中的信息混乱:对医生绩效和患者安全的影响。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2011 Nov-Dec;24(6):745-51. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2011.06.100255.
3
Public health emergency preparedness and response communications with health care providers: a literature review.
用于收集吸毒人群健康的社会决定因素及其对艾滋病毒治疗结果影响的移动健康工具:试点可行性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Mar 26;9:e59953. doi: 10.2196/59953.
4
Do Perceived Message Effectiveness Ratings Change in Response to Repeated Message Exposures?感知到的信息有效性评级会随着信息的重复曝光而改变吗?
Health Commun. 2025 Feb 28:1-9. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2025.2466115.
5
The development of disaster preparedness education for public: a scoping review.公众灾害防范教育的发展:一项范围综述。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 17;25(1):645. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21664-0.
6
Inclusive Crisis Communication in a Pandemic Context: A Rapid Review.大流行背景下的包容性危机沟通:快速综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Sep 16;21(9):1216. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21091216.
7
A Comprehensive Analysis of COVID-19 Misinformation, Public Health Impacts, and Communication Strategies: Scoping Review.全面分析新冠病毒错误信息、公共卫生影响和传播策略:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 21;26:e56931. doi: 10.2196/56931.
8
Assessing community-level impacts of and responses to stay at home orders: The King County COVID-19 community study.评估居家令对社区的影响和应对措施:金县 COVID-19 社区研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 8;19(2):e0296851. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296851. eCollection 2024.
9
"": Identifying Information Gaps, Perceptions and Misconceptions on COVID-19 Among Minority Ethnic Groups in the Netherlands.《“”:识别荷兰少数族裔群体中关于新冠疫情的信息差距、认知与误解》
Front Health Serv. 2022 Jul 8;2:824591. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.824591. eCollection 2022.
10
Do Sustainable Palliative Single Fraction Radiotherapy Practices Proliferate or Perish 2 Years after a Knowledge Translation Campaign?可持续姑息性单次放疗实践在知识转化活动 2 年后是增多还是消亡?
Curr Oncol. 2022 Jul 19;29(7):5097-5109. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29070404.
公共卫生应急准备和响应通信与医疗保健提供者:文献综述。
BMC Public Health. 2011 May 18;11:337. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-337.
4
A critical evaluation of clinical decision support for the detection of drug-drug interactions.药物相互作用检测的临床决策支持的批判性评价。
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2011 Nov;10(6):871-82. doi: 10.1517/14740338.2011.583916. Epub 2011 May 4.
5
Improving Patient Safety through Medical Alert Management: An Automated Decision Tool to Reduce Alert Fatigue.通过医疗警报管理提高患者安全:一种减少警报疲劳的自动化决策工具。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2010 Nov 13;2010:417-21.
6
Public health communication with frontline clinicians during the first wave of the 2009 influenza pandemic.2009 年流感大流行第一波期间与一线临床医生的公共卫生沟通。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2011 Jan-Feb;17(1):36-44. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181ee9b29.
7
A review of human factors principles for the design and implementation of medication safety alerts in clinical information systems.临床信息系统中药物安全警报设计和实施的人为因素原则综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Sep-Oct;17(5):493-501. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.005264.
8
Challenges involved in the Salmonella Saintpaul outbreak and lessons learned.沙门氏菌圣保尔疫情爆发带来的挑战和经验教训。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2010 May-Jun;16(3):221-31. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181b3a3e4.
9
Using electronic health record alerts to provide public health situational awareness to clinicians.利用电子健康记录警报为临床医生提供公共卫生态势感知。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Mar-Apr;17(2):217-9. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2009.000539.
10
What evidence supports the use of computerized alerts and prompts to improve clinicians' prescribing behavior?有哪些证据支持使用计算机化警报和提示来改善临床医生的处方行为?
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Jul-Aug;16(4):531-8. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2910. Epub 2009 Apr 23.