Suppr超能文献

调查护士进行意识水平评估的知识、态度和自信模式:一项聚类分析。

Investigating nurses' knowledge, attitudes and self-confidence patterns to perform the conscious level assessment: a cluster analysis.

作者信息

Chan Moon Fai, Matter Ihsan

机构信息

Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Pract. 2013 Aug;19(4):351-9. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12077.

Abstract

By accurately assessing a patient's conscious level, the nurse is able to detect neurological changes in order to improve survival outcomes and minimize long-term sequelae. However, problems are encountered when using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) to assess a patient's conscious level. This study aims to identify the profile of a group of nurse's knowledge, attitudes and self-confidence (KAS) to perform the conscious level assessment using the GCS. A descriptive correlational survey was conducted from January to March 2010 in one acute care hospital in Singapore. A convenience sampling was used, and 114 nursing staff (91.2% response rates) completed a self-reported questionnaire. Four main outcomes: demographic and clinical experiences, and KAS. Two-step cluster analysis yielded two clusters. Cluster A (48.2%) was labelled 'average attitudes, knowledge and self-confidence' group. Cluster B (51.8%) was labelled as 'positive attitudes, good knowledge and high self-confidence' group. Two clusters showed differences in the levels of their KAS. Findings may be used for management to improve support of nurses to ensure accurately assessing patient's conscious level. Management should formulate strategies to encourage nurses to resolve actual problems following training or mentoring and to increase the depth and breadth of nurses' KAS to perform the conscious level assessment using the GCS.

摘要

通过准确评估患者的意识水平,护士能够检测到神经学变化,以改善生存结果并将长期后遗症降至最低。然而,在使用格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评估患者意识水平时会遇到问题。本研究旨在确定一组护士使用GCS进行意识水平评估的知识、态度和自信心(KAS)概况。2010年1月至3月在新加坡的一家急症医院进行了一项描述性相关性调查。采用便利抽样法,114名护理人员(回复率91.2%)完成了一份自我报告问卷。四个主要结果:人口统计学和临床经验以及KAS。两步聚类分析产生了两个聚类。A组(48.2%)被标记为“态度、知识和自信心一般”组。B组(51.8%)被标记为“态度积极、知识良好和自信心高”组。两个聚类在KAS水平上存在差异。研究结果可用于管理,以加强对护士的支持,确保准确评估患者的意识水平。管理层应制定策略,鼓励护士在接受培训或指导后解决实际问题,并增加护士使用GCS进行意识水平评估的KAS的深度和广度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验