Mid Sweden University, Sweden.
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2013 Aug;27(4):191-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2013.03.004. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
The aim of this study was to explore if patients admitted to forensic psychiatric care decreased their assessed risk for violence over time, to identify patients who decreased their assessed risk for violence exceptionally well (30% or more) on the clinical (C) and risk management (R) scales in the (HCR-20), and to compare them in terms of demographic data.
The HCR-20 risk assessment instrument was used to assess the risk for violence in 267 patients admitted to a Swedish forensic psychiatric clinic between 1997 and 2010. Their assessments at admission were compared with a second, and most recent, risk assessment.
The risk for violence decreased over time. Demographic criteria had no impact on differences on decreased risk. Only two factors, namely gender and psychopathy showed a difference. Risk factors associated with stress and lack of personal support were the items that turned out to be the most difficult to reduce.
The results show that risk prevention in forensic care does work and it is important to continue to work with risk management. The study highlights the importance of a careful analysis of the patient's risk for violence in order to work with the patient's specific risk factors to reduce the risk.
本研究旨在探讨被强制收治于精神科法医处的患者的暴力风险是否会随时间降低,以确定在临床(C)和风险管理(R)量表(HCR-20)中,评估风险显著降低(降低 30%或更多)的患者,并对比他们的人口统计学数据。
本研究使用 HCR-20 风险评估工具评估了 1997 年至 2010 年间被收治于瑞典法医精神病诊所的 267 名患者的暴力风险。将他们的入院评估与第二次也是最近的一次风险评估进行比较。
暴力风险随时间降低。人口统计学标准对风险降低的差异没有影响。只有性别和精神病态这两个因素存在差异。与压力和缺乏个人支持相关的风险因素是最难降低的因素。
研究结果表明法医处的风险预防确实有效,持续进行风险管理非常重要。该研究强调了仔细分析患者的暴力风险以针对患者的具体风险因素进行工作,从而降低风险的重要性。